Just AWFUL


This movie was painful to watch from beginning to lame, predictable end. Not even a quarter of the way through, and I was already hoping for the main character to "off" himself. That would've been a small, glimmering light cast upon this completely in-the-dark movie. Instead, I will just have to settle for Robert Downey Jr.'s performance.

This movie was completely pointless and contrived. Think "Ferris Bueller's Day Off", then detach all realism and common sense and you will have "Charlie Bartlett". It would be a run-of-the-mill teen movie if not for the total lack of a story, enormous plotholes, and the ridiculously incomprehensible devotion to the main character as the focus.

Anton Yelchin shows absolutely no range as an actor in this movie. He expresses sadness by giving us a kind of "puppy-dog" look and slumping his head over and happiness by over-the-top smiling. His voice is like that of a pre-pubescent boy and is basically a monotone throughout the movie. They were likely trying to emphasize his calm, cool, and collected nature but instead it ended up seeming very unnatural and forced. On top of that, the character had no depth whatsoever, but that is no fault of the actor.

So, Charlie gets kicked out of private school and enlisted into a vastly different public school resulting in the "fish-out-of-water". Charlie is sent to a shrink for his misdeeds, and is prescribed with Ritalin. He gets high and decides to peddle it at school. Here's the funny part: he becomes an overnight sensation because of it. Every student gets high off of Ritalin at a school dance and mayhem ensues. All of a sudden, all of the kids at school want to see him because he's the guy that's got the goods. Charlie manages to somehow not be discovered by the principal (Downey Jr.) and continues to peddle meds to way too many kids out of the school bathroom for two weeks or so. When he is finally discovered to have been nearly liable for the death of a fellow student (unsuccessful suicide attempt) he is suspended for a whole three days. No jail time necessary, not even an expulsion. In the end, the problem and solution to everybody's problem is within Charlie Bartlett. I'm going to cut this short because I'm not looking to do a monologue.

2/10

reply

[deleted]

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It doesn't always have to be a good and positive opinion...get over it!!!!!!!

BLAKLUNGZZZ, if I had not posted on here, you would be the most brilliant one of all....but alas, I am......

"You're a *beep* ugly bitch. I want to stab you to death, and then play around with your blood"

reply

cant agree more this movie is so full of itself its painful. not only that apparently the person who wrote this went to John Hughes high. its all just stereotypes that dont even work. for one in a school full of weirdly dressed kids why would he be picked out especially since alot of teens dress ins similar garm to "rebel" and why does the bully take the tracks home from school but has a car?
BS all the way bad writing faux angst and kids wth the most dumb problems " i alienate myself and dont talk to people; why dont i have friends" its a terrible movie

Starring in that 227 movie "New Jack`ee City"

reply

[deleted]

Well i'm a 43 year old male and i loved this movie! Anton was perfect as the strange quirky Charlie and Hope Davis made me a chuckle a few times as his equally weird mother. Definitely a pleasant surprise.

reply

Charlie isnt strange nor quirky hes a arrogant prick. hes more date rapist than quirky. nothing he does in this movie is interesting or nor is his comicly medicated mother who between pills and vodka has the ability to talk sense into here jerk of a son. hes a piss ant and this is a terrible movie

Starring in that 227 movie "New Jack`ee City"

reply

you guys have no taste in movies because this is one of the best movies ever made and ferris bueler SUCKS!!!

reply

well, i loved it

reply

I found the movie to be surprisingly enjoyable. I think if you don't take the movie too seriously, then you'll find it fairly entertaining. If you're looking for a new masterpiece or something you've never seen before, then I don't know why you watched this movie to begin with.

reply

"When he is finally discovered to have been nearly liable for the death of a fellow student (unsuccessful suicide attempt) he is suspended for a whole three days. No jail time necessary, not even an expulsion."
there was no proof
principal even said it in the movie
they didnt have cameras in the bathrooms, and getting any students to say it was him is circumstancial(sp?)
sure the doctors prescribed it to him, but he could have been smart enough to keep some, or know how to lie.

either way there is not enough evidence to convict him, and if they tried, they'd waste time because by a perfectly legal standard, he couldnt be put in jail, all they had was circumstancial(sp?)


also, i like the movie, some performances could have been better, but overall it was good.

I have to admit that the funniest jokes were in the special features instead of the movie itself

reply

I too hated this movie pretty much from start to finish. The plot was horrendously contrived and the execution of the 'everyone needs a stable father figure in their life' theme was painful. Downey Junior was the only saving grace and as a fellow teacher I can identify with his character but also felt really hacked off by him as he was a typical example of people who should not work with kids.

The main character was very unlikable, smug, narcassistic, verging on unpleasant at times and also a pretty crappy friend to Len.

I know it is just a movie but honestly can't understand why it would appeal to anyone.

reply

Your long-winded diatribe "was painful to read from beginning to lame, predictable ending."... not that I truly read all of your self-righteous bantering.

reply

I am truly hurt although I think to call my briefly explained opinion a diatribe is going a little too far. Self righteous? In what way because I have an opinion which I don't claim is right I am self righteous? I don't understand where you are coming from there.

reply