Ridiculous ending
Am I the only one who found the ending to be completely contrived, if not nonsensical. This has nothing to do with the fact that she died, and that it was sad. I have no problem with sad endings, when they MAKE SENSE. The thing I don't understand is WHY she had to die? In what way did it help the narrative, the plot, the story, or the lesson to be drawn from it? Here we have a story about a girl, her dream, and her struggle to live out that dream, despite her horrible family, and all the odds being against her, and as she is about to realize even the tiniest portion of that dream: BLAM, you're paralyzed... Why that? To me it seemed like it came TOTALLY out of left-field. It was like Eastwood had this great movie going, had everything worked out perfectly and suddenly realized that it was getting too long and he needed to end it and that's the first thing he could come up with.
It just didn't make sense in relation to the rest of the story. Now some people will say "well that's life, sometimes *beep* happens." And yeah, that is life, but MDB isn't life, it's movie. Her injury seemed totally useless and left me wondering where in the hell Eastwood pulled that idea from.
Mystic River = Eastwood movie with a SAD, SAD, SAD ending, but one that MADE SENSE. Any thoughts?