Why is this movie so unpopular?
Why is this movie so unpopular? its never on tv and you never hear it mentioned, its a really good movie that is like undiscovered.
shareWhy is this movie so unpopular? its never on tv and you never hear it mentioned, its a really good movie that is like undiscovered.
shareIn the USA, its because its not horror. For some boneheaded reason, horror and zombie films are actually....get this....more desired by the american public than sci-fi!
sharehorror genre was always popular through history. in fact it is the first genre to have a theater dedicated solely to a single genre, all the way back in 17th century.
---------------------------------------------
Applied Science? All science is applied. Eventually.
[deleted]
It became a lightning rod for critics who hated that Michael Bay didn't care what he thought of them because all his movies made big money. When this one didn't, in America, all Bay-bashers had a hate-fest.
share[deleted]
It's strange because as much as I know this movie is bad, I still really enjoy it! There are some great elements to it - music, performances, visual effects, cinematography are all top notch.
Because it's directed by Michael Bay. The IMDb neckbeards love to hate him and his movies. I thought the movie was awesome but I also like Michael Bay's movies so there's that.
Utah! Get me two.
[deleted]
Last night my children and I watched it for the first time. We all enjoyed it and afterwards had a discussion about clones and the ethics surrounding the subject.
I know the movie isn't perfect, but the moral questions it asks are important and fascinating, I enjoyed the look of it and the script was all right. It had me hooked untill the very ending.
As far as being original, I like the way they used the familiar elements in their own way. Many movies aren't completely original anymore, most subjects in our current world already have been covered. It's difficult to find something that nobody ever wrote about.
Besides, it fits a certain genre and genres alway have some similar traits, nothing wrong with that. All romcoms have people falling in love with each other while they hated each other first or they have people afraid to tell the other that they're in love or one of them is somehow tied to another, yet most of them use these elements to create a variety of different stories, even with their similarities.
And ghost stories, most of them have similar story lines such as a ghost can't find peace because something still has to be done on earth or a ghost hates every living person and kills most or a ghost wants your body to have another life on earth, etc. Yet the film makers often turen these similar elements into their own story. Even the most original ghost story will have elements which many many other ghost stories have.
Same goes for any other kind of movie. What makes a movie really great imho is the way a story is told.
http://beknown.com/sahdia-khalid
http://tadjurba.blogspot.nl/
One of my favorite elements of this movie is the question of life's validity. Is it OK to euthanize a sentient human just because they are no longer needed? Is cloning an entire person merely to serve as replacement parts something people would be morally comfortable with?
I realize that the "owners" are told that their agnates are not "alive" alive, but is it even remotely possible that the expectant mother doesn't realize it would take a living, breathing person to carry a baby to term?
I paraphrase, but Sean Bean's character inasmuch tells the contract mercenary that people don't want to know what's actually going on with their clones.
Another thing I enjoyed was the unbearably sterile and futuristic "inside" compared to the bleak and dirty outside. For me, it gave the movie an interesting feel, highlighting the difference between the perceived and the actual.
Great movie, loved the score, too.
"I do not like mixing up moralities and mathematics."
Churchill