MovieChat Forums > Big Fish (2004) Discussion > Better than Forrest Gump?

Better than Forrest Gump?

posted 13 years ago by OmNomNom_NomNom
18 replies | jump to latest

I was inevitable for me to compare these two. I personally thought this one was better than Gump, since the story in Big Fish was just generally better. what do you think?

Help get this film in the top 250: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0274518/

[–] Green_Lump 13 years ago

Yeah right.

~ Waffa

[–] Zuider_Zee 13 years ago

Gump is a schmaltzy crapfest and Fish leaves it far behind in the dust.

[–] crostonc 13 years ago

No, Forrest Gump is a masterpiece!

[–] Cagney68 13 years ago

Good, but no Gump.

[–] ChristianWoolf 13 years ago

Big Fish is art!

Straight Edge is the only way to be free.
Rachel Weisz FOR Catwoman!

[–] Thrillseeker303 12 years ago

Both are masterpieces in their own way.
-------------------------------
Relax! - www.bryanel.com

[–] Wombstar 12 years ago

I enjoyed both but Big Fish is so much better.

[–] hiddenagenda1 10 years ago

Big Fish (2003)- 10/10
Forrest Gump (1994)- 3 or 4/10

You know it!

Volker Flenske: (While torturing David) I don't know why you're doing this to yourself!

[–] GeneticSugarKane 10 years ago

I greatly prefer Big Fish.

My IMDb lists: http://www.imdb.com/user/ur5570856/lists?ref_=nv_usr_lst_3

[–] IMDB_Vits 10 years ago

FORREST GUMP: 9/10
BIG FISH: 5/10

[–] Congirl 10 years ago

Both are good for totally different reasons.