MovieChat Forums > Fa yeung nin wah (2001) Discussion > Did anyone else fall asleep during this ...

Did anyone else fall asleep during this film?


For me, this film started really well and I was drawn in. However it let itself down badly in the last 40 minutes or so. It became painfully and unwatchably slow. So much so that I fell asleep in parts.

Towards the end I just wanted it to be over. I know someone may reply to this and say something along the lines of "you just don't appreciate art house cinema" but there are slow-moving, engaging films and there are films that are just boring. This was the latter.

reply

Out of all slow paced film this is the easiest one to pay attention too. It wasn't even that long.

reply

I fell asleep so many times I had to keep rewinding the movie - it took me three hours until completion.

reply

I'm right there with you! I fell asleep several times! And I'm not a "bang bang shoot em up" movie type of person, so it's not that. It's just TEDIOUS. I can't handle a 10 min. scene in which NOTHING happens.

reply

I saw this film late last night and did doze off briefly. This morning I came here to see if I could get help in understanding it. Eventually I came to a couple of conclusions. First the two characters said they didn't want to be like their spouses: they would remain chaste. I believed this until I made a connection. In the car she said 'I don't want to go home.' Years later you see her with a child. Wow! They did. Secondly this film is set in 60s Hong Kong. Seriously moralistic. What would happen to a boy grown up from an adulterous relationship? He would be very unlikely to have a happy life. Whereas if his parents were an unblemished married couple he would fit in unremarkably. Thirdly this is the secret that Mr Chou understands (He is intelligent and observant).You might remember the point where he realises, and smiles. He will seal the secret away for ever. Hitchcock couldn't have done it better.

reply

I gotta admit, I didn't care for it either. Maybe I'm just not classy enough for this type of film, but I found it really slow and tedious. I know it's an arthouse film so I didn't expect any explosions or car chases, but the movie felt as though it thinks it's meaningful and artistic simply because it's slow. That's not what artistic films are about. Fast-paced, exciting films can just be as artful and deep as slow, methodical art films. Having your takes go on for hours and repeating the same scenes over and over again doesn't mean "bold" or "artistic".

Another problem I had with it was the acting. Actually, not so much the acting, as both Tony Leung and Maggie Cheung gave solid performances, but more so the tone. Every character talks in such a slow, quiet, deliberate manner. No one ever raises their voice, laughs, tells a joke, or even swear here and there. Everyone just acted super mopey and depressed the whole time. Again, I know this is an "artistic" film, but this simply isn't engaging. It's boring to see two people talk with no more humanity or emotion than a *beep* Vulcan. Which is why I never once felt anything when Chow left Chan in the end.

I usually hate to describe a film in such a manner but if I were to describe it in one word, I would call this "pretentious". Now I just gotta prepare myself for all the Wong Kar-Wai fanboys going like "You just don't get it! You don't understand arthouse cinema!"

reply

"Did anyone else fall asleep during this film?"

Yes, several times.

What hump? 

reply

I feel exactly the same way. It has dated horribly and is nearly unwatchable today.

reply

it's beautiful, but the story just didn't move me and I had the feeling the staging and clothing were almost more a character than the two main characters. Can't give it more than 5 stars, because for me a movie has to be more than beauty to the eye. It was just too boring and slow and hardly anything happened. And I didn't even go in with much expectations. I never heard of this movie until recently and decided to watch it, cause of the high ratings here. Guess ones again I am not a mass-follower who likes anything that the rest of the world loves.

reply