I have been obsessed with this story for god knows how long, I'm halfway through the book - Finally have it as it was bought as a present :0)I own the '96 version and intend to see the others. Who would you say is the best Rochestor: Timothy Dalton, Orson Welles or William Hurt?
Yes I know in the book Rochestor is supposed to be dark-haired and a little cruel to Jane but I thought Hurt played his part really well 'Meet the new boss...Same as the old Boss'
IMO, the best Rochester I have seen was in the Broadway stage version. It was a short lived musical. (beautiful music) It's problem was that it came out about the same time as The Producers so it didn't stand a chance. James Barbour played Rochester. Wonderfully smoldering looks, beautiful baritone voice. <<<sigh>>>>>
Michael Jayston!!! The 1973 adaptation is the best and to me Jayston BECOMES Mr. Rochester. He has every nuance down. James Barbour is my second favourite though.
-*-*-*- The gross vapours of earth were gathering around me, and closing in upon my inward heaven.
There *is* something about that beautiful story that is hard to forget. Although the William Hurt version of Jane Eyre is what's mostly shown on TV, and he is quite good...my vote goes to Ciaran Hinds who is a bit more ferocious. Both, hugely talented actors...as are their predecessors.
What about Samantha Morton and Ciaran Hinds??? You didn't mention them
"She was Lo, plain Lo, in the morning, standing four feet ten in one sock. She was Lola in slacks. She was Dolly at school. She was Dolores on the dotted line. But in my arms she was always Lolita. Light of my life, fire of my loins. My sin, my soul. Lolita..."
I have always felt George C. Scott played the part to perfection.He is not really ugly or handsome, he was gruff but yet tender. He was able to portray a very commandng demeaner without being too overbearing.
As someone else mentioned, Alan Rickman would be great in the part.
Without a doubt Michael Jayston in the 1973 adaptation. I think a lot of the people who have commented have never seen this adaptation, but after watching it nothing else comes close. Michael Jayston portrayed the character perfectly. He is an outstanding actor and his voice is amazing. Dalton is an excellent actor but once you've read the book he just doesn't seem right in the part. Also too handsome. For anyone who hasn't seen it, buy the 1973 version when it comes out on DVD in June.
I'm sorry for contradicting anyone else's opinions, but Orson Welles IS Rochester! Timothy Dalton was ok, but no more than ok. And I was dissapointed with Hurst's portrayal. He was far too tired and didn't seem interested throughout a lot of the time. But the bit where he revealed Bertha to everyone did impress me. But the charcater of Rochester didn't come across to me at all with Hurt (although Hurt did do an almost flawless english accent). Orson Welles seemed to have been born for the part of Rochester, after I saw him in the 1944 film I really grew to like the story even more!
Yes, liked Orson Welles, probably my second favourite Rochester. Really disliked Tim Dalton, just not right for the part. But my favourite has to be Michael Jayston, he IS Rochester. What a performance, stunning!