MovieChat Forums > Dead Man Walking (1996) Discussion > If death penalty alone is FUNDAMENTALLY ...

If death penalty alone is FUNDAMENTALLY bad and is morally just as wrong as murder of innocents...


… why haven't certain legal institutions and places in the world, if they aren't totally barbaric themselves, have abolished them on moral grounds, and if it really is "murder" just like killing innocent people is murder, why hasn't anyone sooner or later been punished for it or stopped in the first place?

Or is it REALLY like that despite what some may say - and if we do hear them say it, can't we just collectively disagree or dismiss it as non-sense? As in, is it REALLY in and of itself just as bad and immoral as when criminals kill innocents?

P.S. Oh yeah, so OK death penalty we see as bad, even if it doesn't touch innocents by mistake. But stuff like imprisonment and also say bad conditions in prison - can we at least REGULATE it all? But jailing someone alone or rather jails and prisons aren't bad even with mistakes, no matter what crime was committed, but death penalty is? What if death penalty was only administered in extreme cases and with like perfect proof? And with regards to stuff like brining grief and pain to even criminal's relatives, well... Even without it people do it, and its understandable at times, but then again, what is a more humane alternative? And most relatives feel sad and grief even for their criminal siblings at times for a variety of reasons, but then, if they get killed in self defence?

reply

The death penalty for murderers is not morally just as wrong as the murder of innocents. Only the pitifully naive or stupid could believe such an asinine idea.

reply

But then why do so many people here, seemingly intelligent ones, actually state and argue that it is so, besides the fact that in both cases there is the removal of one's life?

reply

And who ultimately DECIDES which is which and which side is ULTIMATELY correct here?

reply

What makes you the arbiter of who deserves to live? That makes you sound like a psychopath… almost like a killer. And since innocent people have died on death row, that makes the government just as guilty of state-sanctioned murder.

reply

What are you talking about? Most of the developed world has abolished capital punishment for being barbaric and inhumane. The USA is one of the only holdouts, due to it being a backwards, bloodthirsty nation.

reply

"What are you talking about?"

2 Anthony Socks - OK, I understand you have a very direct, very specific and very concrete opinion about real life capital punishment, regardless of where it takes place, including in the USA as you are also apparently aware of its minuses and nuances and generally still - you are very against it. And you apparently also believe that murder is always bad even if it applies to guilty criminals who may have also murdered innocents and possibly not just once etc as well as apparently for other reasons too.

But what am I talking about in here?

Well... For instance, how, although for a variety of complex reasons sadly not in life, but in fictional scenarios like movies and say books and fairy tales, even if not by the system, then by individuals, you have guilty criminals like murderers executed (have you seen any ACTION films Anthony, Die Hard, Lethal Weapon, James Bond films etc or even Death Wish Charles Bronson films) or just killed and not only do audiences don't blink an eye at it or say its "barbaric and wrong" but are in fact in support of it. (I also know because I've read reviews of such films for decades. Yep - no complaining there if villains get defeated at all.)

But... You have movies like this, Dead Man Walking, and other examples, even if the system really does execute say guilty individuals, and we often even then still think its bad, wrong, cruel and that, you know, they should be given many years of imprisonment instead, but if you execute them via the system, which many even say is bad and wrong in and of itself (why didn't the LAW think of that?), then its as bad or almost as bad if a murderer kills someone innocent etc and we simply wonder how right that is.

And America is what, really, a BACKWARDS nation?

And I myself am NOT saying if I totally agree OR disagree with it all, but I kind of want myself and others to come to a nice and satisfying conclusion in all of this.

reply

Yes murder is murder and we don’t live in a b&w world where everyone is 100% bad. Even “murderers” may have a legitimate reason for being on death row that’s understandable. Not everyone on death row has killed someone either. Because there’s gradations and context. And there’s also the indisputable fact that capital punishment does not prevent crime either, which is why the rest of the developed world has abolished it and only the USA clings onto it due to some kind of biblical, eye for an eye bloodlust. And if capital punishment is apparently morally okay, then why aren’t politicians on death row for being mass murderers?? There is no moral superiority here, it’s just state-sanctioned murder and unconstitutional. Capital punishment is just a way for the establishment to shit on minorities, the mentally ill, and poor people. The “justice system” is already completely corrupt as it is, adding capital punishment on top of that makes the whole system seem like it’s run amok.

reply

The way I see it, the actions you take are the rules you are consenting to, and rules apply equally unless otherwise agreed upon. If you kill someone without their consent, it becomes fair for someone to kill you.

reply

First of all, an eye for an eye is not “biblical. bloodlust”, Anthony. It means that the punishment should fit the crime.

I don’t have any problem with murderers, rapists, etc. getting life in prison. But so often, that does not happen. They serve part of a sentence and get out to claim more victims. Capital punishment may not “prevent crime”, but it sure prevents murderers from doing it again. Laws don’t prevent people from committing crimes either. Should we abolish laws?

The Manson Family was given the gas chamber, yet their sentences were commuted to life when California outlawed the death penalty. It was infuriating and totally unfair for the families of the victims to have to go through a painful ritual every few years when these evil people came up for parole! Parole!

Sharon Tate’s mother, Mrs. Doris Tate, asked her daughter’s killer why should he be given mercy. All these killers go to college on the taxpayer dime, they “find the Lord” and blah, blah, they are all better now and rehabilitated. Makes me want to barf.

I have read many books on what cops deal with. They are appalled at prison psychiatrists who fall for these criminals sob stories and phony bulls@#$! Big Ed Kemper was back out on the street after murdering his grandparents when he was 15. One parole officer argued that he needed to be in prison. Ed Kemper attended one of his parole hearings with the head of one of his teen-age victims in the trunk of his car!

To his credit though, he has refused parole hearings and remains in prison now. The prison system is too stupid, but at least he has the self awareness to say, “ I should never go free.”

One cop said he hates prison psychiatrists because “they put absolute maniacs back on the street.”

Don’t want to execute them? The leave them where the belong, in a jail cell until they die.

reply