I hate hate hate this movie with as much hate as I have for anything. People worship this movie as if it's a brilliant piece of film making. Two and a half hours of overacting and ridiculous scene after ridiculous scene. I saw it once and will never ever watch it again. And the idolization of Pacino's character is really stupid. Yeah let me get a tattoo of a murdering, lowlife drug dealer and addict because I'm inspired by his rise to the top. Please.A career low for everyone involved in this pile of crap. Thank You.
E, I agree with you. This is the first I've ever seen the entire movie, and am disheartened by all the accolades heaped on to this steaming pile. Overacting is putting it mildly. Pacino, even this early in his career, seems to have started on his road to yelling every line. I really do not care for movies which are 100% dispiriting. There's not an uplifting moment in the whole seven hour movie.
The Oliver Stone script matters, and is good. (It is a warm up for Stone's take on capitalism and greed, "Wall Street" of 1987.)
I think the long scene where Tony deals successively with Frank Lopez, the crooked cop Bernstein and the henchman Ernie is an exercise in character and dark humor.
Hidden within Pacino's bravado performance as Scarface is a portrait of a leader and a brave man. That's why gangstas love him.
Look at how he holds up during the chainsaw scene. He's scared, but he won't give up the information on the money and he spits in his torturer's eyes.
Look at how he outmaneuvers Omar and makes pals with Sosa...but does NOT sell out his boss(Frank Lopez) in dealing with Sosa ("Frank's a smart man...this is a crazy business, anybody could have hired the wrong guy.") He also tells Sosa he has only two things in this life -- "my word and my balls" -- and he will break neither. A gangster's code.
Look at how he tries to bring his "boss" Frank in on "expanding" (he's really telling Frank HE's the boss now) -- but then goads the weak Frank into trying to assassinate him, thus allowing for the payback execution of Frank and taking of Frank's girl, Elvira.
Crucially and his big downfall -- he won't kill the woman and two children. That separates him from all the other savages in Scarface, and allows him to be a hero to generations of gangsters.
---
That said, Tony's courage and leadership capabilities have no ability to overcome his human downside -- his incestuous love for his sister, his inability to truly love Elvira, his absolutely crazy sudden decision to kill his best friend. Cautionary: its the drugs in his system that bring on his ultimate downfall -- he kills Manny and doesn't see the hit team swarming his property until it is too late.
Garish, violent, slightly campy movie -- but very solid in the scripting and themes.
PS. I think its that horrible fake disco score -- "Flashdance"/"Fame" style -- that makes Scarface seem cheesy today, but it is a perfect capture of American music culture circa 1983.
You mentioned pretty much every single thing that makes this film so unique and memorable. Although I totally disagree with you regarding the soundtrack, which I reckon gives a pretty close idea of the 80's vibe and oddly enough shows how free and liberal people were at the time and how they partied during those hot Florida days. As far as I'm concerned, Giorgio Moroder's score makes Scarface even more epic than what it would already be if it wasn't for it.
I understand this may not be everyone's cup of tea for plenty of reasons, but to downright hate it or not understand it, is beyond me.
[after killing an Irish] Burn him, see if his ashes turn green - Bill the Butcher
You mentioned pretty much every single thing that makes this film so unique and memorable. Although I totally disagree with you regarding the soundtrack, which I reckon gives a pretty close idea of the 80's vibe and oddly enough shows how free and liberal people were at the time and how they partied during those hot Florida days. As far as I'm concerned, Giorgio Moroder's score makes Scarface even more epic than what it would already be if it wasn't for it.
----
I'm always ready and willing to change course and change my mind. Truthfully, I miscommunicated. I do love the overall Giorgio Moroder score -- distinctive, of its time(1983), omimnous -- and truly great, I think, when the Bolivian hit team swarms Tony's place...its like they bring their own tribal music along with them.
Its the disco music...it doesn't quite seem like the real thing to me. The movies had not yet gotten really sophisticated about "background music" yet -- often rock songs and disco songs were a bit fake as done by Hollywood composers. IMHO.
---
I understand this may not be everyone's cup of tea for plenty of reasons, but to downright hate it or not understand it, is beyond me.
---
Agreed. Despite the "prestige" credentials of Al Pacino when he made "Scarface", it seemed to have a reputation at the time of being trashy, cheesy...and way too violent. But it always had that great script and performances and it took years for its true colors to emerge and its fans to solidify.
I'd like to say I'm old enough to have seen Scarface on its opening weekend, and I loved it then. No wait for me. I DID notice its savagery as being pretty real and raw -- the chainsaw scene, how Omar dies -- it reminded us that to make gangster money you gotta be ready to be a monster and fight monsters.
"It's the disco music... it doesn't quite seem like the real thing to me".
Of course, it wasn't the "real thing", as it were. But at the same time I think ridiculous numbers like "Dance dance dance" or "Take it to the limit" do quite well to capture the empty, soulless glitz of this gangsta world obsessed with surfaces and accumulation of wealth for its own sake. I agree though that Moroder's score is quite instrumental in the film's overall success - some have also described it as "soulless electronica", but listen to the simmering main theme... there's indeed an ominous quality to it and I'd even say sort of a tragic, sorrowful undercurrent.
"The movies had not yet gotten really sophisticated about "background music" yet".
Are they sophisticated now? I'm really not sure what you're saying here...
This movie is raw and gritty, yes. The acting is amazing. The story made me care about Tony even though his character has serious flaws. The restaurant scene is epic and true.
There's a difference between liking it as a piece if work and liking it as a story. I think it was well made and that the story and characters were completely unlikeable.
Gotta agree with TheCommenteer. It was well done in every aspect of moviemaking...but the characters were horrible and painfully stupid. Big difference.
Scarface isn't terrible, but yeah, it's certainly overrated.
It's the kind of movie (at least for me) that you love when you're 14-15 years old, then you get a little older and realize how cheesy and over the top it is.
In real life, someone of Tony Montana's ilk wouldn't have a chance in hell at rising to the top of the criminal underworld. He was essentially a hotheaded, undisciplined jackass. He'd be a foot soldier at best in real life, and even that wouldn't last long before someone put one in his head.
It's funny because I was about that age when I first saw it, it became an instant favourite of mine to say the least. Being in my early 20s now, I wonder if my thoughts on it would change if I were to give it a rewatch. All I'll say is I personally love it despite it's datedness, it's definitely not a film for everyone though.
"He was essentially a hotheaded, undisciplined jackass".
But he wasn't undisciplined during the first half of the film. He certainly had the street smarts and impressed the big kingpin Sosa with his no-nonsense, straight-to-the-point approach to business which was instrumental in paving the way to being a major local distributor in Miami (it's not like he was some great transcontinental mastermind though - now 'that' would have been unrealistic). In fact, the only unwise thing he did during the rise segment of the film, was openly hitting on Frank Lopez's woman, which almost cost him his life.
The fact that it stands the test of time means it is a good film. I was hooked from beginning to end. I particularly liked it's relationship to history and i liked the cinematography. Infact, i found some of the scenes memorable, eg, building at the start where chainsaw guy was, and then Tony's mansion scene toward the end. Remember the interior scene Tone inside the mansion and the room is decorated in all black (and gold)? That is eerie and an artstic element to signify the darkness in Tony's life, and that the whole thing had regressed to the 'dark side'. I really, really liked this film :)