Far from it. I first saw the movie as a kid on HBO, and I didn't care for it at the time either. That's because what I wanted out of a Robin Hood movie was what I suspect you want: a rousing, triumphant, swashbuckling adventure, where the baddies get their comeuppance and Robin and Marian go off to live happily ever after at the end.
That's not what this movie is, or what it was ever meant to be. It's a character study about, not the legendary Robin and Marian, but about the kinds of real people who could have been behind such legends, and more specifically about them getting older and having to live in the shadow of the legend that had grown up around them. Remember the scene where Robin and John meet up with Friar Tuck and Will Scarlet? Will tells Robin that he's been traveling around for years, singing songs and telling stories, because "people want to hear about the things you did."
"But we didn't do them," replies Robin in genuine confusion. The point being Robin and his men had had a few adventures, but nothing like the spectacular escapades that people heard of in the songs. That was all legend.
And at the end, while Robin defeats the sheriff, his peasant army is run off. While he talks of rebuilding it and gloriously fighting the good fight, Marian realizes that even if Robin doesn't die painfully of the terrible wounds the sheriff gave him (which is likely), he's starting to believe the legend himself and its going to make him bite off much more than he can chew. In the real world of the middle ages, little people like them don't get to overthrow the king and live happily ever after. Robin, if he recovers, is headed for a gallows, and she doesn't want to see him broken like that, so she gives him a peaceful end, and decides to go along with him herself as well.
It was a nice touch that they used the end that Robin had in the old legends, and the final, blindly-shot arrow to determine the site of his grave.
reply
share