Given that Vonnegut is one of those writers whose true power is in how he tells his stories, in his own distinct voice & literary style, I'd say that the film is as good an adaptation as we could hope to get. It benefits from being made in the early 1970s, because it's still in tune with the cultural zeitgeist then.
As for Vonnegut being passé, as some posters have suggested, I couldn't disagree more. The issues of human absurdity, stupidity, cruelty, apathy & indifference that he addresses are just as timely today as they were some 50+ years ago, when he wrote his seminal books. If anything, his sardonic, scathing assessment of human tribalism driven by fear & insecurity, the ease with which human beings slip into violence & mindless hatred—all of that is even more frighteningly timely & urgent today.
For all the talk of his pessimism & misanthropy, he's made it quite clear that he's a deeply wounded humanist, and his message is a plea for kindness, decency, and simply enjoying the wonders of life while we're here for this fleeting moment of time.
"Hello babies. Welcome to Earth. It's hot in the summer and cold in the winter. It's round and wet and crowded. On the outside, babies, you've got a hundred years here. There's only one rule that I know of, babies—'God damn it, you've got to be kind.'"
This says it well:
http://www.katewickens.me/blog/2016/11/16/kurt-vonergurt-god-damn-it-youve-got-to-be-kind
For me, the film works superbly.
reply
share