The Worst Film Ever??


I just saw this, and, well, it was the worst film I've seen in a looong time.

Everything about it was awful, to the bad acting from Lee Marvin, to the terrible camera-work, out-of-place music, stupid sound-effects, and worse plot.

Seriously, this was SO terrible. Maybe it's just because it's dated, but I've seen films 30 years before this that aren't dated, so it has no excuse. Lee Marvin is that guy we all know and hate - the one that loves himself so much he probably kisses the mirror in the morning. And to believe he's a sex symbol! Wow.

I've seen a fair few bad films in my time, but none that I have really hated all the way through. The whole theater (it was at a place which shows older films) was laughing at all the unintentionally funny moments, and never at the actual jokes. What a load of *beep*!

reply

jonohargrave:

The cinematography was excellent. You must like today's shakycam garbage.


"I'm - I'm hurt real bad. I think I'm dying"

"Continue dying"

reply

You may have that disease where you perceive everything in reverse. Or, you meant to comment on Paint Your Wagon (1969). Marvin was never considered a sex symbol by anyone and isn't the "loves to hate him" guy. The Camera work was a breakthrough in cinema history. Everything from the 60's looks dated, because it's in color. The score is beyond reproach and the plot is only confusing if you don't understand whats going on. Next time you watch it, think about everything you normally do, but in reverse. Or, maybe they invented a med for your condition. Either way... Get help.

"What rotten sins I've got working for me. I suppose it's the wages." -Bedazzled (1967)

reply

Blah . Troll .

That which does not Kill me makes me Stranger

reply

I couldn't get past the first few minutes. But, to be fair, that's probably not the film. More me being impatient. May give it another try sometime.

"Hey! Ladies! That was fun!"

reply

Sure, Troll 2 is much better than this one. Give me a break ¬¬

reply

9 years late but let me say , "Garbage Posting " Every "point" made is a false, opinionated,"blank" Great Movie!!!

reply

Oh, don't feed the troll. Obviously he couldn't spot a good movie if it hit him. Point Blank leaves the viewer thinking about it whereas your average movie these days is forgotten by the time you leave the cinema.

"Remember, you have to make it home to get paid" (The Dogs of War)

reply

yes so true,,\

reply

Everyone is entitled to an opinion but... how old are you? I consider this a hard-core great brutal revenge film like Michael Caine's 'Get Carter'. Did this film not have enough CGI for you? oh well, you are completely entitled to your opinion... I personally LOVE this Movie. One of my favorites.

You're damned if you do and damned if you don't ~ Bart Simpson

reply

a great flick. you can look at it as a simple action movie or delve deeper into some of what it leaves to the viewer in the end. lee marvin in one of his best roles and one of boorman's better films. i don't think anything in this seems dated at all.

even if you hated this film, you still get to look at angie dickinson for 90 minutes and see the dean from animal house take his turn as a bad guy.

reply

Firstly I am not a fan of L.M. normally but in this movie he excels.

Its minimalist acting at its best, if he started emoting all over the place, it would go against the character and destroy the pace, and ultimately the film.

Addressing a complaint up Thread, NO you don't have to have read the book first to understand what's going on, I picked up on it right away, and I'm no genius, on the other hand though I AM an adult.

I suspect that the people who found it too difficult for them are/were in their early teens when they watched it, and are used to watching so called films made for grownups that wouldn't challenge a twelve year old.

The whole point of the mysterious informant is so that it all comes together at the end.

Would make it all pretty pointless and boring if we were given a running explanation on why everything was happening.

At the other end of the "critique "spectrum, we get the people who fancy themselves as being really artistic, and have to demonstrate their knowledge of buzzwords so that we know how gifted that they are.

Rather then giving a realistic and useful impression of what they've watched .

Quite frankly if you're sitting there thinking oh yes, Parisian semi surreal nouveau noir etc. then you are actually out of the film and not really watching it as it is meant to be watched.

I understand good writing and good direction, but if you're consciously aware of them then its not good.

The fact is that this movie is one of the best of its kind, (sorry genre)'ever made .

A little thing, but important I think, the anti hero gets to his target each time without having super human skills or luck, just very believable plans .

And more then a few of the reviewers missed the plot, we're told that he's after his money.
But at the end it turns out that its not his motivation at all.

How on Earth can you write paragraphs, analysing this, comparing that, in an incredible knowledgeable manner when you don't even understand the plot ?

On the same par as people who claim to like movies that are so bad that they are good in an inverted snobbery sort of way, when what they really mean is, badly filmed equals non scary !

But I digress, my apologies.
A work of sheer genius that grips you from beginning to end, so enjoyable in fact that over the years I must have seen it at least four times and it never fails to deliver.

reply