MovieChat Forums > Mission: Impossible (1966) Discussion > I like it, but it's Preposterous

I like it, but it's Preposterous


I like this show a lot, but it is preposterous. Here's why:

1) Jim always accepts the mission, so why does the tape even suggest that he might not? Also, why does he have to go to different public places each time to get the tape? Can't someone drop it off at his house? I just saw an episode where he pulled his car into a tollbooth, and the tollbooth attendant marked the booth as out of service, then walked away while Jim went into the tollbooth and listened to the tape there. Helloo!!! Highly Noticeable!!! At least go behind the tollbooth main office and listen to it in an alley!!!
2) As soon as Jim accepts the mission, the next scene is always him and Barney and the others finishing up with the plan. Even though the vast majority of missions take place in other countries, they always know the detailed blueprints of every building and have every crawlway and wall they have to drill through figured out.
3) Even though the vast majority of missions take place in Eastern-bloc countries, Mission Impossible team members are instantly highly-placed government officials, or military people whom nobody ever challenges on the grounds that "Who the F are You and why do you speak with a bad Czeckoslovackian accent?" Also, even though these countries have no black people in them, nobody ever notices Barney sneaking around in the electrical closets.
4) The plans are highly farfetched and not very believable. In real life it's more likely that they would just put a bullet in the villain or at worst poke him with a poison umbrella.

reply

Not sure if you're trying to be funny or what.

reply

5) Rollin Hand, man of a million faces, and those preposterous rubber masks.
6) Success of plans depends on too many variables beyond the control of the team such as villians and innocent bystanders acting and reacting as expected.

reply

> 5) Rollin Hand, man of a million faces, and those preposterous rubber masks.

Well, they almost always seem to work.

> 6) Success of plans depends on too many variables beyond the control of the team such as villians and innocent bystanders acting and reacting as expected.

They usually have back-up plans. Plus, these folks are well rehearsed in thinking on their feet. We've seen many episodes where the plan collapses near the end and they just have to wing it.

--
What Would Jesus Do For A Klondike Bar (WWJDFAKB)?

reply

If you want preposterious, try watching some of "Mission: Impossible's" contemporaries of the time namely "The Man From UNCLE" and "The Wild Wild West". Those shows were even more outlandish and went WAY overboard.

The key difference between "Mission" and most other spy shows of it's era is that it played it straight. Granted the show did leave the realm of believability from time to time but for the most part, it was well written and well planned.

Bruce Geller (the creator of the series) felt that in order for audiences to take the show seriously, the characters had to treat the assignments in the same way. If it was too tongue in cheek or the humour outweighed the drama, the series would fall flat and wouldn't succeed and he was right. Both "UNCLE" & "WWW" burnt themselves out after a few seasons but "M:I" lasted a respectable seven years and won back to back Emmys for Outstanding Drama Series.

reply

The key difference between "Mission" and most other spy shows of it's era is that it played it straight


Peter Graves finally decided to play it wacky in Airplane. I sure liked him when he went for the humor.


"Dyin' ain't much of a living, boy."
Josey Wales

reply

1. It's a spy show, so they invented different ways of getting the tape (or record in some cases) to him. I do laugh at the ones where Phelps gets the tape, and then listens right in the middle of a public area, like a park or a boat dock.

2. Already talked about by others.

3. The accents are used simply as a device to show you they are in disguise. I suppose they could have used subtitles in English with the actors speaking some eastern European language, but viewers would probably have tired of that. It would probably have increase production costs as well, for not much gain.

Many of the episodes have elaborate methods of the IMF intercepting inquiries and verification requests about identities, or it is explained that the targets and the person being impersonated have never met before. Or, you have Rollin Hand or Paris in one of their disguises.

As for Barney Collier, you must remember the times. With the exception of Bill Cosby on "I Spy" and the guy who played Rochester on the "Jack Benny Program." There were NO main characters on American Television played by African Americans. I think there was a concerted effort to change that in the mid-1960's, with Ivan Dixon as TSG Kinchloe on "Hogan's Heroes" as another example. In fact, I have read that "I Spy" was not picked up by some network affiliates in the South because it had a black main character!

4. The idea was to create dissension in the enemy and have them shoot/execute each other, usually with some complicated deception, and only the one about to be killed had figured it out. I think this is when the show really worked well. Also, there was a Television Production Code that would not allow the "good guys" to shoot first, just like the production code in motion pictures from 1934 to 1964 or so. That is another reason why you see the villains on "Mission: Impossible" episodes killing each other, not IMF members doing the killing. Finally, the complex schemes that IMF devises is what draws you into the show and keeps you coming back. I think that is why a show like "Hogan's Heroes" also was popular during this same time.

reply

Actually the silliest scene is the one between #1 and #2, where Jim is sitting on a couch going through his MI personnel, and guess what: he always picks exactly the same 4 people!

I've always wondered who were the reject pictures, whether it was some kind of in joke among the cast and crew.

reply

I've always loved the fact that a super secret spy organization has its name (Impossible Mission Force" embossed on a portfolio of photos of all of its agents!!!

reply

Well, the most prominent featured photo of a person rejected is of Bruce Geller himself (the B/W profile shot of a guy with black hair and glasses).

reply

Also, even though these countries have no black people in them, nobody ever notices Barney sneaking around in the electrical closets."

Thats false. There were thousands of African students, officials and military personal who lived and studied in the Eastern Bloc during the Cold War.

Plus, the character wasn't that dark skinned and could have passed for a swarthy Caucasian(someone from the Caucasus mt. region), Central Asian or even Romani as long as he walked the walk and talked the talk.

reply

There were no black people working in the offices that Barney penetrated, so he should have stood out like a sore thumb. I take your point about what it was like in reality, but on the show, you didn't see this. Not dark skinned? He was dark skinned, wide-nosed and would never have passed as white, don't agree with you there.

reply


More than once Barney affected a Caribbean or Spanish (Portugese?) accent, meaning he could've been from Cuba, Brazil, or one of the former Portugese, Belgian or French colonies in Africa.
"May I bone your kipper, Mademoiselle?"

reply

I did like the one episode, "The Town", where they humanized Jim Phelps a little bit and got creative with the opening. It wouldn't have killed the show to do a few more episodes like this one.

I agree that there are way too many moments where C has to follow B and B has to follow A in order for the whole mission to work. Sometimes while the plot is unwinding, I'll say to myself, "You know, if the bad guys had just shot Rollin or Phelps right here--like they should have--the whole mission would have failed (and the secretary would have had to disavow all knowledge of their actions!)" Sort of like the bad guys always leaving James Bond alone to escape instead of just shooting him a couple of times in the head and being done with him.

But as for these criticisms, oh well. An action show must have action and the inconsistencies or logical holes which we all notice in the plot are just things that we have to accept and move on. You can nitpick all of the unbelievable stuff that happens in "Lost", "Breaking Bad" or "The Walking Dead" to see that Mission Impossible doesn't hold a patent on impossible TV.

reply

1. It would be quite a short episode if they didn't accept the mission.

2. They have gov't connections, other spying missions have mapped out buildings in foreign countries.

3. One has to assume they speak with the correct accents & have very good fake IDs. People from African countries were in Eastern Europe as part of exchanges in the hope of proving communism the better system for the third world.

4. The plans are often not to kill but to discredit the villains. Killing him makes a martyr but discrediting him ruins the other side's plans. Some episodes do have the IMF set up a guy to get killed which makes you wonder why go to all that trouble.

Ayn Rand-the philosopher of the intellectually bankrupt.

reply

They should have had just ONE episode where Jim listens to the tape and says: "Aw, hellllll naw!" and then the rest of the hour is just him sitting at a desk in an office drinking coffee.

reply

Then the show would have been retitled "Mission: Couldn't Be Bothered!".

reply