MovieChat Forums > Christopher Columbus Discussion > Biggest historical figure after Jesus

Biggest historical figure after Jesus


Columbus singlehandedly influenced the course of world history and of hundreds of civilisations and billions of people.

Jesus aside, noone else has had the same weight in human history.

reply

Plus, Columbus was a real person. Makes him #1 in my book.

reply

Jesus was as real as him or you.

reply

If he was, there's no evidence to prove it. We know Columbus walked the earth.

reply

There is quite a lot of historical evidence of Jesus.
Stop reporting fake news.

reply

I challenge you to provide even one.

reply

Jesus historical existence is not even remotely in dispute, other than by eart flatteners and fake moon landers.
Study some history and do some research before sounding like one.

reply

So rather than provide any evidence your response is "if you disagree with me you think the earth is flat."

There is nothing written by any contemporary of Jesus that mentions Jesus. At BEST we have three references by writers who wrote 65 to 120 years after his birth, and none of the three references stands up to close scrutiny. All non-biblical information we have about Jesus was written by believers more than 120 years after his birth.

How can someone who was supposedly so renowned, beloved, and revered be completely absent from all histories written earlier than 120 years after his birth? The gospels portray Jesus as famous far and wide, a prophet and healer, with great multitudes of people who knew about him, including the greatest Jewish high priests and the Roman authorities of the area. Matthew and Luke both write about massive followings and congregations. If he was so famous, why didn't anyone write about him?

The area in and surrounding Jerusalem served as the center of education and record keeping for the Jewish people. The Romans also kept copious records. Moreover, the gospels mention scribes many times, not only as followers of Jesus but the scribes connected with the high priests. As for historians, there lived plenty at the time who had the capacity and capability to record, not only insignificant gossip, but significant events, especially from a religious sect who drew so much popular attention through an allegedly famous Jesus. But nothing whatsoever was recorded. There were about 40 historians who wrote during the 1st and 2nd centuries A.D., none of whom mention Jesus.

If Jesus existed we have absolutely no historical record of it. If the gospel accounts are true, we have absolutely no historical evidence to back them up. Faith in Jesus as a divine being and savior seems well beyond far-fetched when we haven't even a shred of evidence that the human Jesus even existed.

reply

Nope, your "facts" are all wrong.
Nobody here is talking about the gospels other than you. No shit those are not historically accurate.
There is plenty of reference to Jesus not even 40 years after his death. By historians and chroniclers of those times that had a chance to live in Palestine in the same years he was there.
Again, just fucking google it.

reply

I studied it for years in college, initially as a Christian seeking to prove he existed. Find me one contemporary historian who mentions Jesus. He is never mentioned in any history, or in any records, until long after his death. Even the Romans, who recorded *everything* never mentioned him in any records that were kept during his alleged life.

reply

It seems your studies were incomplete or superficial. I am no historian but their consensus is practical certainty of Jesus existence.
Read more about the historical figure of Jesus and you'll see what they concluded.
I accept the experts opinion, no need for alt versions of reality.

reply

THERE WERE A LOT OF GUYS NAMED JESUS...MOSTLY IN MEXICO...BUT STILL...WHOLE LOTTA JESUS GOING ON.

reply

I'm right there with you, I did the same, wanted to be a Biblical archaeologist and the more I learned . . .I had to be honest with myself. There is no way I can ever be a believer again. Education destroys religion every time.

reply

I was a student in a seminary for a time, and into my 20s I was a devout Christian. It was only in college and post-grad that I began studying deeply in to the history of Christianity. For YEARS I searched for even one historical source to prove the existence of Jesus, and to justify all the errors in the Bible, but at some point I realized it was a fool's errand. They are ancient stories, made up by ancient people, to explain a world they did not understand. Jesus is no more real than Zeus or Osiris.

reply

Wow, I went to a seminary for college too! I wanted to use that education to go into archaeology, but after a couple of archeology classes I was worried, I knew that I was wrong, had been wrong because I had been given an edited history of reality and as it was being laid out for me I could see it.

It really sucked because up until that point, Christianity had been my North Star. I had to start from scratch with my thinking. It was painful, but once it happened it opened my mind up like someone had finally turned on all the lights. I’m grateful for it now.

reply

My whole life I had felt like in every matter other than religion I trusted facts and logic, but when it came to religion I had to ignore truth in favor of faith. When I finally got past that irrationality, it was the same thing-- like the lights had been turned on.

reply

Dude, the whole concept of Jesus is a myth. Only the foolish weak minded believe all that religious nonsense, which are all fairy tales

reply

And what do you have to replace it? Hopeless Nihilism? Nothing matters, the universe merely exists, no creator, no redemption, why bother with anything at all just suffer and die? What great and powerful thing do you have that brings peace and happiness and hope?

At the very least you could do, Let people believe in something that helps them. It requires nothing of you then to simply not engage. If you actively engage and try to put Christianity down, then you better offer something good in its place other than "Yall are all dummies, why hope, there is nothing to make you feel better, haha im so smart, im better than you, bye bye bozos".

dude...fuck off.

reply

You have been lied to and laughed behind closed doors by the people who brainwashed you in whatever silly religion you believe in

reply

satan is your daddy.

Your refusal to answer my question only shows you truly have nothing goodly to offer in place of religion.

reply

Your statement has a plot hole. The people who share his religion also believe it, and it gives their life meaning and satisfaction. There's nothing wrong with that. Even if what they believe is nonsense, it doesn't matter.

reply

Thank you.

reply

millsey72's Religion: His "Professor." 🙄

reply

Maybe the third after Adolf Hitler.

reply

Hitler?
What the fuck did he ever do to change history?
Create volkswagen?

reply

Some of the best paintings of western civilization

reply

Right. And some fashion design. That's about it.

reply

He single handedly defined how fashionable a certain mustache style will be for the rest of human history. Wtf did Colombos do?

reply

Before Columbus, nobody even knew that there were western continents. The few that stumbled onto them barely made use of the land.

Thanks to Columbus, European colonists were able to create one of the most powerful and desirable countries in the world.

reply

That is by far his biggest contribution: making that horrible square moustache obsolete.
Columbus invented overseas vacations. Unbeatable.

reply

What did Hitler do to change history? 👿

You assume "greatness" is always positive.

Hitler had a profound influence on history like few other men.

Would I rank him above Columbus in evil "greatness"? Probably not.

But the question "What the fuck did he [Hitler] ever do to change history?" is a ludicrous one.

reply

So much stupid in this response.

reply

Sir Isaac Newton

reply

Newton?
He was even less than Galileo, who only changed our perspective of the universe.
Norhing very practical.
Colombo changed the world from before to after his trip.

reply

Newton is widely regarded as the single most important physicist (called a natural philosopher at the time) and mathematician of all time.

reply

Sure, he probably is.
So what?
Columbus is widely regarded as a guy who did not even understand where he landed.
What he achieved is nonetheless the most important event in human history after Christianity.

reply

"What he achieved is nonetheless the most important event in human history after Christianity."
Both of those are not even close.

reply

No?
One revolutionized the morals, philosophy and the way we perceived the universe and our own lives.
The other radically changed the notion of our world, its politics, economics and anthropology, ending the middle ages.
What have you got?

reply

I'll give you two.
I don't know if these are #1 and #2, but these are miles ahead of of Columbus and a religious leader in terms of what this achieved for humanity.
1. When humans discovered they could farm land.
2. The invention of the printing press.

reply

Farming, fire etc have no single known author.
We do not know who discovered them nor if it was one guy only or many over time.
The printing press did only sped up stuff that we've been doing for millenniums already. Great improvement, nothing really new other than cheaper books.
Certainly no match to Jesus's nor Columbus's impact on history.

reply

So what if farming has no known 'author'.
You cannot deny it was a major step in human development.
Without that evolutionary step, Jesus wouldn't have his bread and wine. He would've just been hunting and gathering living a nomadic existence.
The printing press brought books to the masses. Increased literacy. Enabled the storage and transfer of knowledge.

reply

I said "biggest historical figure", not "best contributor to humanity".
Napoleon, Caesar or Hitler were a huge figure too.
Got the concept?

Knowledge has been stored and transferred for 10.000 years before print. I would put Gutemberg barely in the top 10.

reply

You said "What he achieved is nonetheless the most important event in human history after Christianity."

reply

Important is not necessarily positive.

reply

No shit Sherlock.

reply

So what don't you get?

reply

So what don't you get?

reply

Actually, I am interested to see your top 10.

reply

I don't have one.
Do you?

reply

But you said you do have a top 10.
And the Guttenberg was not even in that top 10.
So what is it?
Or is it twice now in this thread you have said something and not meant it?

reply

Back in 1999 the Biography channel had a countdown of the most important and influential persons of the millenia (not off all time) and the number one spot was given to Gutenberg for the invention of the printing press.

reply

I'm surprised they didn't place the inventor of tv....
Where did they place these two?
Nowhere because 1 is a religious figure and the other is "controversial" to Americans?

reply

Well Jesus did not live in the second millennium which ran from 1001 A.D. to 2000 A.D. (although many people mistakenly believe it ended in 1999 A.D.) and Gutenberg is famous for printing the Bible so I don’t see how the selection of Gutenberg is anti-religious or anti-Christian.

reply

Who said anything about anti religion?
I said no Jesus or Mohamed or Buddha etc because I bet they excluded religion founders as a method.
I did not know their stupd list was only 1 millennium.

reply

Columbus definitely had an influence on the world, but naming him #1 is a stretch. If he didn't cross the Atlantic, then someone else would have. Now Mohammed (to the extent that we know he existed), was a one-off that fundamentally changed the world forever. There wouldn't have been another if he just said "fuck it, I am just going to stay in Arabia and raise goats".

reply

Mohammed is a heavy figure, but he did not introduce such revolutionary concept as neither Columbus nor Jesus. He started yet another monotheistic religion centuries after the world already got the news.
Other than the very ordinary Ottoman empire and the crusades, he did not influence much of the course of history.
His impact is still relegated to a part of the world only.

And what ANY man ever came up with, sooner or later another one would have had the same idea. So what? We still give credit to the first one to do so.

reply

"Other than the very ordinary Ottoman empire and the crusades, he did not influence much of the course of history."

Wow, I can't believe you brushed off events that played such a pivotal role in the formation of modern Western Civilization as "ordinary." I am so gobsmacked, I am not sure how to respond. I referenced all of Islam, but I will confine myself to the Ottoman empire as that is what you referenced. It existed for approximately 700 years and for a while included the northern coast of Africa (the Berbers). Any student of history knows how the Berbers (and the Barbary Pirates) wreaked havoc on Europe for Centuries. They ruled southern Italy for centuries.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_Italy

and even controlled Iceland for a hot minute.

https://jddavies.com/2017/02/20/the-barbary-corsair-raid-on-iceland-1627/

usually I can tell, but this instance I can't. So if you are just trolling me, trying to get me to respond, just fucking stop. I have better things to do.



reply

The Ottomans were a quite ordinary, uneventful empire.
They unsuccesfully tried for centuries to expand beyond their dominions, which were never that rich nor prosperous to begin with.
What else have they ever brought to the table?

The Mongols or the Egyptians or even the British and the Persians had a more historically significant empire, let alone Napoleon or the Romans.

reply

The ottoman empire existed for seven centuries, and ravaged Europe during all that time. Napoleon is way overrated and doesn't even belong in the discussion. Keep in mind that the Ottoman empire was just one piece of the Islamic empire, which, without question, greatly influenced the modern world. In the seventh century, Mohammed was a warlord that taught his followers to be conquerers, and 1.5 billion of them are following that doctrine to this day. ISIS rolled right through what was Iraq and slaughtered the Yazidi (which was in accordance with Islamic doctrine). Between 2013 and 2017, there were several high profile attacks on western targets (e.g. the 2017 Barcelona attack, the 2015 Paris attacks, the 2015 San Bernadino attacks, the 2016 Orlando nightclub shooting).

To be honest, I don't blame them for lashing out against the west, as those who are supposed to be championing liberty and freedom (the West), have been starting illegal wars in the middle east for the past 20 years. There were never weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, Assad never gassed his own people, and they didn't even give us a reason for smashing out Libya. It was all just pretense for turning what were stable and prosperous countries into rubble, and why? Western powers are the biggest villains on the planet right now, and we need to change that.

reply

I remember first seeing this book at a bookstore in 1986 which ranked Mohammed as the number one most influential person in history.

reply

Maybe in the top 100. And that's not including the hate he gets from modern American Indians.

NOT NUMBER ONE>

NO WAY IN HELL.

reply

albert einstein

reply

What is that different thanks to him?
Our understanding of the curvature of time and space?
Very relevant to everyday life...

reply

ouch. his work is just the foundation of almost every technologial advancement since the 1930.
mainly nuclear theory and radiowaves.

reply

Which did...what for history?
The highly uneventful cold war?
Fermi and Oppenheimer had a way bigger influence on nuclear power than Einstein.

reply

you must be retarded, im sorry for you

reply

Wow, that is a totally NOT retarded answer at all. Thank you for clarifying that fact.

reply

Jesus wasn’t real so CC must be number 1 in your world.

reply

Jesus was more real than you.

reply

Erm you are replying to me. Jesus will never message you.

Just realised this was a joke post haha well played.

reply

Jesus, having lived 2000 years ago, has little chance of messaging anybody. Unlike you, unfortunately.

reply

Wow, this thread devolved BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

reply