Uganda


Jews were offered a Homeland in Uganda. It would have been preferable to their current situation of unceasing warfare with their neighbors.

reply

When was that again?
Check out something called "Operation Thunderbolt" at the Ugandan airport of Entebbe in '76.
The Ugandan government of Idi Amin supported the PFLP at the time and sent troops to prevent the Israeli commandos from freeing the 106 hostages whose plane had been hijacked (spoiler: they didn't succeed, and most of the hostages were freed...)

reply

Yes I know about that operation. This offer was long before Uganda even became a nation, in the 1920’s. They were offered a part of the country as a future Israel. I think they should have taken it and they Would have been better off for it today.

reply

Israel has the best cotton in the world. Uganda just has coffee.
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=israel+cotton&docid=607986847448571401&mid=1492D50C40185F6F1FDB1492D50C40185F6F1FDB&view=detail&FORM=VIRE

reply

But they’d be at peace now. Uganda has rich soil, Israel is dry and chalky.

reply

Oh, and can you imagine how well it would be going over when there is this successful, wealthy non-black country in the middle of Africa with poor black Africans all around? Yeah, Wouldn't fly. And there is a reason Jews congregated to Israel. It wasn't like it was a random location.

reply

Why would that be a problem? Are you suggesting that Africans can’t build a wealthy nation?

How do you explain this in the middle of Africa:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qVEcvdclrqo

reply

Is it under a camouflaged dome like Wakanda? Stop hiding your best countries, Africa!

reply

Well Afrikaners are African, and they build successful communities.

reply

If it's so wonderful, why don't the Palestinians go there?

reply

They were already in Palestine when Jews were in Europe and the British pitched the Uganda scenario to the latter.

reply

The Jews were there before the Palestinians. They were unwillingly exiled but even so, not all left.

reply

Then a two state solution is the solution

reply

I agree. Unfortunately most Jews AND Palestinians oppose it.

reply

Then both sides deserve this perpetual hell

reply

By the looks of it, that's exactly what they'll get..

reply

True, they made their beds

reply

It's not like the middle east has been at war for millennia, lol.

reply

Hence why Uganda would have been the more peaceful option

reply

I agree. The Palestinians should have gone there.

reply

It was the Jews who were looking for a place to live after the pogroms became too much. Why would the Palestinians evict themselves?

reply

There are plenty of Arab nations where they could live in peace. The Jews have their own land where they have been for thousands of years.

Here's some interesting reading:

https://www.thebereancall.org/content/seven-reasons-jews-have-sole-claim-israel

reply

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uganda_Scheme

Even Theodore Herzl the founder of modern day Zionism endorsed the idea.

reply

He clearly didn't speak for everyone, lol..

reply

It would have avoided all this conflict today

reply


Honestly, I wish the U.S. would have offered and the Jews would have accepted a few thousand square miles somewhere in the midwest back in the early 20th century. Middle East policy today would be just to turn the whole area into glass.

reply

They wanted that specific land for very specific reasons.

We're just gonna have to sit back and watch them kill each other. Eventually, there'll be a winner (probably the Arabs at which point (ironically) the area will turn into a shit hole that they won't even want).

reply

Idk Israel has nuclear weapons

reply

They gonna fire them on Gaza?

reply

On any Arab nation that might try to invade

reply

Saudi Arabia and Pakistan attacked the US in 2001.

Neither were bombed or invaded.

The modern Arab attack would be similar. No individual government would be acknowledged as an aggressor.

reply

Then Israel won’t go down because of one such attack

reply

It will be more than one. And it will never end.

reply

Only as strategic weapons if they ever use them they'll internationally trigger a "Let's Go ! Nuclear" global warfare situation which is still avoided since WWII.

That will completely backfire on them especially if global powers decide that Israel is a nuclear happy country and should be disarmed immediately in case they decide to make more enemies besides the Arabs in the future.

reply

Hence why they’re deterrents.

reply

Ok, but Uganda, or Kenya, or Alaska is not the holy land...there is a reason why the 3 big religions have been fighting for that land for thousands of years..

reply

Yeah dumb reasons that get people killed.

reply

To understand this situation you really have to know something about biblical prophecy. The Jews are exactly where they're supposed to be.

reply

Says who? Their own scripture? I don’t understand the American evangelical obsession with Jews and Israel. They rejected Christ. Why do American Christians simp so hard for a foreign religion that rejected their God and egged on the Romans to crucify their messiah?

reply

American Evangelicals are to Christianity as Fundamentalist Muslims are to Islam. Both abhor homosexuality, liberal and open-minded acceptance of non-religious people who don't share their faith and a society molded after their interpretation of biblical scripture.

Israel's government and supporters know this and play to it to secure their share of Foreign Aid every time a "loan" is needed.

reply

We don't "abhor open-minded acceptance of non-religious people who don't share our faith." I can tell you that I was raised Christian but left the faith for 20 years to pursue agnosticism and New Age ideas. I eventually returned to Christianity.

I consider myself an evangelical. I get why people don't believe it though. I've seen it from both perspectives.

No one I know who is a Christian thinks that non-Christians should be persecuted in any way. It's just that we think that Christianity is true, and that it is in each person's best interest to follow Jesus, and we say so.

reply

I have Born-Again cousins. They ex-communicated me because I never accepted Jesus Christ into my heart. They also believe that non-Jewish Arabs and even Christians in Israel should leave so that their god can set up the final days when Jesus returns and places his final judgment. They also say that I'm condemned to Hell because I'm okay with Gay marriage, open marriage, and sex outside of marriage.

Your brand of evangelical may not push this but there are many in the US who do and have influence AND support AIPAC.

reply

It's possible that your cousins are just assholes.

As I told you I left Christianity for about 20 years. No one "ex-communicated me." Largely it wasn't discussed at all, but when it was, I was gently encouraged to move back toward Jesus. Eventually I did, but it took a very long time.

Hell's a tough topic, and it's one I've spent a long time thinking about. Ultimately it comes down to whether or not a person has chosen to align themselves with God or not. If one has, God will bring them into his kingdom. If that person has not made such a choice, and therefore aligned themselves against God, then he will respect that choice and allow them to remain outside the kingdom. It's just that those who find themselves outside the kingdom may find that it sucks.

It's ironic we're having this conversation because just the other day I ran into a quote from a theologian named J.I. Packer and it struck me with enough force that I wrote it down: "Scripture sees hell as self-chosen. Hell appears as God's gesture of respect for human choice. All receive what they actually choose, either being with God forever, worshipping Him, or without God forever, worshipping themselves."

So the question every person has to ask themselves is this: Do I want to be in union with God and his plan and purposes or do I want to ignore Him and do my own thing?

As for non-Jewish Arabs and Christians in Israel leaving the region so that God can kick off Armageddon, I'm not sure where they get the idea that they have any sort of power over that, or that anyone leaving or staying will influence God's timetable.

reply

My sentiments exactly

reply

I'm not sure I'd call it an obsession, but they're certainly is an interest. You say "their own scripture." But remember that Christians fully accept the Hebrew scriptures. It's just that we also accept the New Testament as well.

The question is this: Does God have a plan involving Israel?

Israel was sent into exile over 2,000 years ago, but it was written that one day they would brought back into their God-given homeland and reconstituted as a nation. Extant writings from over a thousand years ago predicted an event which finally happened in 1948.

You have to decide if this was a purely natural occurrence or if there was more to it than that. Christians believe there was more to it. If that's accurate, it doesn't matter how I feel about it or how you feel about it. It simply is what it is.

I'll go ahead and say this as well: Israel will never be overcome by any efforts to destroy them or eject them from the land that they now possess. You will not see this happen between now and the day that you die. It's just not an event that will occur.

reply

Because of worldly reasons, namely nuclear weapons.

reply