Is it true that Biden actually tried to have him killed?
If that's the case, then Biden should be convicted for life for attempting to assassinate a political official who is running for President.
shareIf that's the case, then Biden should be convicted for life for attempting to assassinate a political official who is running for President.
shareI wouldn't go that far. I doubt Biden would actually encourage someone to kill him. But when you spend years saying He's a threat to democracy, he's literally Hitler, He wants to be a dictator, he's going to take your rights away, he's a racist. That rhetoric is going to affect an unhinged person differently. Does that mean Biden is directly responsible? I don't think so. He's about as responsible for this, as Trump is for "inciting an insurrection on 1/6"
shareAgreed.
sharehttps://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/who-is-greg-jacob-and-why-is-he-testifying-in-the-jan-6-hearings
The real Insurrection that nobody is talking about was the fake electoral scheme concocted in the West Wing. The J6 riot is a red herring to disguise Executive-level treason. Nearly all first term cabinet picks refuse to endorse Trump again, including Mike Pence. Traitor. Sociopath. WORST PRES EVER
@WandererFromYs>>>>>>> I don't see it that way, at all. Biden's "rhetoric" is actually the truth about Trump. What Trump did to incite the violence at the Capitol on J6 is on him. Trump called in his militia to fight for him that fateful day in our history. Like comparing apples and oranges I'm afraid.
shareBidens Rhetoric is just a way to demonize his opponent, and no it's not based in truth. Hes a threat to democracy doesn't mean anything. He wants to be a dictator, untrue. He admires Hitler untrue, Nazi Rhetoric, etc etc. So Biden never calls for violence, but with that kind of rhetoric you can see why an unhinged person would try and take out the threat to our democracy, and the next Hitler.
Trump doesn't have a militia, nor would he need one as president. Those were unarmed civilians called on to protest. The transcript and videos of Trumps speech are available online in their entirety, so you can read and hear for yourself. There are no calls for violence. There was nothing that they could even twist enough to bring charges, or get him impeached.
It's an apples to apples comparison because both situations lead to actions that were unintended by the original comments.
https://moviechat.org/nm0874339/Donald-Trump/669683a78e0dd268e1ad4afc/President-Biden-calls-widow-of-victim-shot-at-rally-while-Trump-snubs-grieving-family
Donald Trump - Jan 19 2024 "Biden is an absolute threat.. he is very dangerous.."
posted 3 days ago by Martoto (4578)
“Biden is a threat to democracy. He’s an absolute threat to democracy. He’s very dangerous,..."
https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-calls-biden-an-absolute-threat-to-democracy-hypocrisy-meter-melts
He’s right, taking a candidate off of the ballot, and taking it out of the hands of the voters is an actual threat to democracy, and guess what, the Supreme Court did overturn it.
It is never going to be like that. It is more like:"We are going to lose at current trajectory. We need unconventional alternative solutions, nothing is off the table." If he has given orders I think that is about as far as it goes.
It is very likely not even him, more of democrat establishment, the election is not about Biden, like most leaders he is just the spoke person of the party, a front if you will. That has never been as apparent as Biden.
Seethe maga is eating itself. This is why God hates america 🤣
shareDemócrats are eating themselves, they want Biden out and he isn't leaving. Pathetic.
shareThe election hasn’t even started bro. Most republicans aren’t even conservative or Christian lol. The average white americant is filthy and liberal af just like trump:))
shareAren't you following the news or what?
shareThe ironic thing about this election is that the leaders of Both parties want their prospective candidates off the ballot.
shareGranting you all of your premises, wouldn’t that be an official act? 🤷🏻♂️
shareI wouldn't go that far. I'd call it gross incompetence due to the cult of DEI.
shareThe court’s conservative majority found 6-3 that presidents were protected from prosecution for official actions that extended to the “outer perimeter” of his office, but could face charges for unofficial conduct.
I am quite sure, declaring an enemy to US democracy is a pretty official act, so Biden can be cool!