You're a clown. And likely a sociopath. Your statement that he was "wrongfully accused" and that this is some sort of victory for guys that actually ARE innocent is the worst kind of dogs#!t.
If anyone actually bothers to read the decision, he WASN'T innocent. A couple of morally/intellectually challenged judges decided some of the testimony shouldn't have been allowed, so they threw out the conviction on procedural grounds. NOT because the testimony was false, mind you. . .but that it shouldn't have been allowed to be presented.
If you think this is some sort of "victory" for "justice," I'll repeat: You're a sociopath.
All of which is besides the point. The case Will be retried, he Will be convicted again. Because he IS a sexual predator, and a sociopath. Which (apparently) you are comfortable with. Unsurprising.
In this inflectionless medium, it's tough to tell if you're being serious, but that is (of course) ridiculous. Take a look at the court transcripts; it's free and simple to do. The man is a sociopath; and definitely guilty. Not just of these charges, mind you. . .MULTIPLE others.