MovieChat Forums > O.J. Simpson Discussion > Was OJ justified in murdering his wife?

Was OJ justified in murdering his wife?


He caught her cheating on him so he killed both her and her boyfriend.

Now, I'm not saying it was the right thing to do and he shouldn't have been punished for it.

But it was a rage killing based on emotion. It's not as if he was a psychopath who killed at random.

If he had confessed, second degree murder, maybe 30 years. Jealous husband syndrome.

reply

No.

I still don't think it was a premeditated murder & that it was, indeed, a rage murder.

But even still, there was no justification for it. Period.

reply

No justification. But Simpson is not the psychopath we've been told. If not for Nicole's affair, the world be mourning OJ today as a dead sports hero.

reply

Both him & Nicole cheated on each other, both during their marriage, & their (supposed) "reconciliation".

It was a toxic, & dysfunctional relationship from the get-go.

reply

He had an affair with Tawny Kitaen: https://popcultmaster.com/2021/06/03/fawning-over-tawny/

reply

And he was seeing Nicole while he was still married to his first wife.

AND, when he first met her, Nicole was 17!

reply

I'm reminded of a Winger song which goes "She's only seventeen."

reply

Not to forget "I saw her standing there" and "In the edge of seventeen"...

reply

See also Stevie Nick's Edge of 17 and Joan Jet's "He mustve been about 17"

reply

This might sound controversial to some, but I'm going with nah.

reply

"Her boyfriend" or "her gay best friend"?

--Michael D. Clarke

reply

The story was that Goldman was dropping off glasses Nicole left at the restaurant. I don't buy that.

reply

You are little confused. They were divorced for almost 2 years at this point, and living separate lives. So regardless of her Relationship with Goldman, it wasn't cheating. O.J had a girlfriend of his own at the time. Paula Barberi. She testified at the trial. So they weren't married, and O.J didn't live there. So it's difficult to call it a crime of passion, when he had no reason to be there in the first place.

Is it understandable from the divorce settlement side of things where she got half a million dollars, 10 grand a month in child support the house etc etc,. Yes, I can see that breaking a man, but it still doesn't justify it.

reply

I'm never confused. This is a rhetorical exercise.

He could afford the child support. This was about love and jealousy.

reply

I know they were already divorced but I still call it a crime of passion. O.J. was literally stalking his ex wife, he obviously COULD NOT let go. There's no justification for murder but most people without a personal connection can see how and why their relationship escalated to murder. Plus, there's a lot of pre-meditation, the hat, gloves, the previous stalking and abuse.

Yet you're right if you confess your sins and apologize profusely you have a much better chance to get a shorter sentence and eventually/ultimately come away from it a better person. O.J. did none of this.

reply

the stalking alone is enough for a prison sentence let alone the murder!

reply

Oh yes, definitely and approx 95% of criminal homicides involve some form of stalking. In other words, it's practically a given.

reply