MovieChat Forums > Abracadabra > Replies
Abracadabra's Replies
Thanks! Didn't know that was a form of treatment.
Thanks for the link, read through it, however....
It still <spoiler> doesn't tell you who exactly is the murderer. Yeah sure they're all in on it, but who did the actual killing? I'm now guessing it's Wally, someone who's strong enough to embed a knife into her pelvis, who also seems to be into raping.</spoiler>
Also, Michael Pitts' character <spoiler> went unanswered. He's probably dead. But who was the person that came up behind him at his last scene? Probably Wally again</spoiler>
And what were they doing with his hand at the end??
I wish the director would reveal these answers to the audience.
Why do you automatically think it's "forcing diversity into the story?"
Is it so hard to fathom someone who might just have a thing for hefty black women?
I know a bunch of good looking in shape guys who are into girls with some meat on them.
Not to mention most of if not all John Carpenter's movies are like that- simple and shallow.
Yeah I thought that was odd too. But I feel like that was a conscious decision from the filmmaker... like, hey nowadays not only football players can be bullies! O brother.
It reminds me of that movie: Synecdoche, New York by Charlie Kaufman
Thank you so much!!
Steaks lols
Or how about Harrison is not really Harrison (gasp!)
second that
The Smiths, Iron Maiden, Prince, R.E.M. Metallica, Slayer, Talk Talk
I don't get why he needed to get that ripped to play Commissioner Gordon. Looking at his future project on imdb, it seems more sense if it's for the role of Omni-Man in Invincible, a TV series.
Ok, and it kinda justified the killing of Harris James later on a bit. Yeah I'm surprised they didn't look into that much.
"Hays and West ended up killing two innocent people thinking they were connected to pedophilia"
I know they killed Harris James, but who's the other one?