MovieChat Forums > SammyJackson > Replies
SammyJackson's Replies
ffs. blocked you obtuse fuck nugget.
I’m not. The article isn’t the point, it’s the narrative it’s trying to paint that’s the point. Along with all the other articles that are pushing for MORE SJW stuff in Star Wars.
In short, the SJWs are using the boycott against the boycotters.
The point is not whether the article is factual or not, it’s about the narrative of what Star Wars fans want. A large portion of the boycotters have complained that Star Wars has been anti white male, and overly SJW in its themes. They chosen to stay away from a movie that gives them what they want. Not because of the quality of the film, but because of sending a message to Disney.
My argument is that stuff like this article and the other one is part of the narrative being presented by that SJW element the boycotters are against. They’re staying away, losing the film money that as I said largely meets their demands, and the SJW are using that fact to push their agenda.
By the time episode 9 roles around everyone will have forgotten about this, and it just be another force awakens Mary Sue fest. Staying away from solo wasn’t the message to send. Going to it in droves was the message to send.