MovieChat Forums > MrAnonymous > Replies
MrAnonymous's Replies
I guess that moment to me was like Anakin when he slaughtered the sandpeople. It was foreshadowing, but I did not see him fully going over there. Subsequent to him killing his commander, he shows concern for his new student Johnny, and is protective of his masters granddaughter.
I never interpreted her moans as pleasure, It always seemed to me that the assault was causing her considerable pain.
But he put her daughter in a position where he believed that there was a real killer. Regardless of whether or not you personally believed there was a killer, if someone who believed there was a killer used your daughter as bait, would you not be furious at that person?
Fired, criminal record, unable to secure another job due to criminal record, yet he still has to take care of his daughter and has a big fine to pay.
I don't know anything about prisons, but I would assume he would have been put in some sort of segregation.
Absolutely. I stand corrected.
I wonder if that was done intentionally so they could keep the option of a sequel open?
I guess that's probably the most plausible explaination.
It would be great of Clancy Brown had a small role, not as an immortal, but maybe a reporter or cop.
Unless he's a relative of Jason Voorhees, I don't see him getting up after all those gunshot wounds.
Unless he's a relative of Jason Voorhees, I don't see him getting up after all those gunshot wounds.
I've always wondered that too. I didn't mind Tony killing him, but it drove me nuts that he went on about "I stayed loyal to you Frank" after having went after his wife right in front of him.
I'd say 99% Teasle. The law is supposed to protect the peace, and sometimes that means being willing to reason with people and de-escalate. In that regard, Teasle was 100% wrong. You cannot just run someone out of town just because their look says they 'might' cause trouble.
As for Rambo, he was morally justified, but this comes down to an issue of 'pick your battles'. Sure he was offended and he was right to be offended since teasle was being a jerk. Still, while most cops I've dealt with were great people, there will always be one or to jerks with a badge. Given that Rambo was heading somewhere else anyway and just wanted to get something to eat, he could have said "Hey, I'm not planning on sticking around your town, I'm going to Portland. Still, I'm hungry and I'd love to get some food. If you let me get a bite to eat here I'll be on my way and you'll never see me again". Let me be clear, he should not have to say this as he had every right to be there, but given that he had a destination beyond that town anyway, he may as well have saved himself some trouble. Granted, I'm not a veteran, so I cannot relate to that aspect of his frustration, so my answer is just speculation.
Did they actually jam it down his throat or merely put it in his mouth? I've always felt that the claim that they jammed it down his throat was just the prosecution exaggerating for dramatic effect. I cant see anyone jamming anything right down a persons throat without expecting fatal consequences.
Perhaps his words were not wrong, I honestly do not know, but he was a hypocrite by not adhering to this code he goes on at length about.
He says "We follow orders or people die", yet he disregarded an order not to do code reds and someone died.
He rants about "Honor, Code, Loyalty" yet immediately engineers a cover up of his actions and throws the two marines who followed his orders under a bus to save his own butt.
I hear you, but he had to know they might try to flank around him and get to her. Why not stay where he knew he could protect his family.
No. Because I would not EVER be in a ring with him regardless of how much money I was offered.
Maybe he felt that his responsibility as an officer was to approach the suspect after he was shot and see if he is still alive, in case he needs to render aid. Remember he does not know Michael is supernatural. To him Michael is an insane killer, but with the exception of Laurie, Loomis and the viewing audience, most rational people would assume he is critically injured, probably dead and no longer a threat.
I'd enjoy if they did a ret-con sequel and pretended all the other sequels didn't exist. If they did that, and convinced Spielberg to direct and brought back Dreyfus I'd be interested. Otherwise I'd say don't flog this dead horse any more.
Agreed. Truthfully I didn't even like the second one. A friend of mine rented the third and I only reluctantly watched it with him (I didn't realize she was in it at first), and when she walks into the hospital during her first scene my interest was piqued. Hers was the only horror movie death that ever saddened me. I read an article where a journalist recommended ret-conning it and pretending away all the other sequels (so she wouldn't be dead), and just treating it like Freddy has been away all this time since the first and I thought it was a great idea.