MovieChat Forums > ranmast > Replies
ranmast's Replies
Want some milk to swallow that salt.
Nope they are canon. There are this kind of creatures in Star Wars lore. Look for the "Purrgil" in Star Wars Rebels, which you liked or not is canon.
I am not saying the monsters in the Solo trailers are Purrgil (though they can be), but that, in the canon, creatures living in deep space and with tentacles actually exist.
Zing!
Ouch! What a shame with these DCEU movies...
[quote][–] Arghhhh (150) 7 minutes ago
Won't do the maths or can't? Seeing as this is one of the dumbest posts I've seen on here.
If 52% of your customers don't like your product you can expect to lose 52% of your customers (I did the maths here) - at least eventually. [/quote]
Seriously, you only write things as stupid, uneducated and unimaginative as this because you don't have to put your face in front of this execration. That's easy, being the clown of the town, when you don't have to show your face.
Seeing you know shit about maths and statistics, you should keep silent, kid. Oh and the maths are:
1,000,000/1,311,000,000 = 0.07%
Prove me wrong, kid. Come one!!!
If you think these 180,000 voters in this non-scientific, non-controlled poll represent in any way the entire scope of the hundred of millions who went to the movie theaters and paid to see this film, then you are more stupid than you thought, and that must be hard even for you...
Ok, let's see what is all the buzz about:
180,074 Voters in RT
52% didn't liked the movie, that's 93,639 viewers
At $10.00 per ticket (a high average to be fair)
That's $936,390, not eve a million dollar.
Let's put it a potential lose of one million dollars.
One million dollars is not even a 0.1% of the total box office of this movie. I won't do the maths here, but not even 0.10% of the total. Oh, and that is not even counting people who can vote without even seen the movie and people voting more than once.
So, yes Disney must be cutting their veins over this scores. Poor Disney there are 100,000 humans who do not like this movie, from the hundred of millions who went to see it. Panic! Armageddon! Nooooooooooo!
Yeah, but with DCEU is always easy.
Ha, ha, ha...
[quote]
Adjusted for Ticket Price Inflation
Rank Title (click to view) Studio Adjusted Gross
1 Star Wars Fox $1,310,298,200
2 Star Wars: TFA BV $992,496,600
3 Star Wars: Episode I Fox $778,700,900
4 Return of the Jedi Fox $743,427,500
5 The Empire Strikes Back Fox $723,955,300
6 Star Wars: The Last Jedi BV $610,725,800
[/quote]
No, they shouldn't. Look at the difference between Episode IV and V in today's money. Almost 600 Million. When you include the international amount is an even greater than the drop in money than TLJ. So, what this means is that in today's money Empire Strikes back would have lost more money than TLJ. I know your answer to this: But John, their weren't released this year and in brute money ESB only lost 200 M. Well, think on tickets sold. ESB sold less tickets sold than TLJ. So, the drop in audience between A New Hope and The Empire Strikes Back is even greater then the Drop in audience from TLJ and TFA. I know you will not understand the concept (no surprise), but the drop in money and audiences from episode IV and V and from episodes I and II are very similar to the ones from Episode VII and VIII.
The second movie of every Star Wars trilogy always decrease in money and audiences. It hadn't and will not made a difference. They will continue. They will evaluate and redirect if necessary, but there isn't anything to be panicked about.
Yes, me too!
A comedy cum all over "darker" DCEU... A comedy?
Wow, the butthurt is strong with this one. Just read the latest new threads in this site. This movie, a comedy, just banged all DC this year. Ouch!
Are you stupid or sick? If not, sue the school where you learned to read. Your reading comprehension skills are nonexistent.
[quote]So the rating is with 49% still way, way too high for such a horrible movie not cause RT is some part of a movie studio conspiracy (like your way of thinking would prefer), [b]but instead cause around the release their were thousands and thousands of positive reviews.[/b] But when the narative of a good Star Wars movie coudnt be uphold anymore cause of most of the movie goers simply hated that movie the rating crashed into the worst region ever (for a Star Wars Wars movie). [/quote]
Another pile of bull shit. You are trying to lie to me. Maybe you can fool yourself (not a big accomplishment) and some other trolls and haters, but when you try to write a lie that will be recorded, at least make one that cannot be easily exposed. "their were thousands and thousands of positive reviews" you said. Bull shit I said, before the first weekend was over the movie was already way under 60% and I can prove it, can you prove your crap. The rest of your "crying like a biatch" rant is so useless that I will just ignore it.
Ha, ha, ha... You are so funny that I tend to forget all the stupid incoherent things you write. In fact, I haven't seen this bunch of written crap since the imbd board times.
So, you quickly abandoned the box office and "your numbers" argument and changed back the topic to ratings. Told you , you couldn't handle a single strike in that regards. But, hey, that doesn't mean you are talking on hyperbole.
[b]For one last time: The rating with 49% is even way too high, cause most recent votes show a rating of appr 36% for TLJ. That happend not cause I prefer believing in strange conspiracy theories like you, but isntad cause "Its the economics, stupid". [/b]
Wait a second here... You are telling me I am believing in a conspiracy, when it is you who cannot prove whether RT scores can be manipulated by people voting several times or voting without even watching the move. Pure common sense. So, my reason stands since not even RT can argue against that. But then you go an write this:
[quote]Another part for the overhelming reviews before the release of TLJ and the first days after release was indeed paid reviews. Thats a part of each movie PR since years. I dont even find that horrible anymore and instead simple subtract on level at the ratings at each review to get the paid reviews out of my perception. [/quote]
Ha, ha, ha... What a bunch of made up stuff. What a brainless, stupid argument that you cannot prove or sustain. Paid reviewers? Yes, prove it. I can see how the paid reviewers have done DC/WB a lot of good for all their DCEU movies. Oh! But only Disney is allowed to pay critics. Now, this is a conspiracy theory, and a stupid one I would say. And the part of "subtract on level at the ratings", ha, ha, ha... Man you should create your own church, this board and this world is full of morons ready to follow you. Yes, my argument is based on a conspiracy and yours are fact. Go figure! You must be very young and a very uneducated one.
Continue...
[quote]Sorry to tell. But I got familiar with thos figures. TLJ made most of its money [/quote]
Ha, ha, ha... Now you showed you are really trolling without bases. We were talking about people liking or hating a movie based on flawed voting systems and your response is box office numbers. No, kid no.
So, you think you are familiar with the figures and numbers. Again no, you know shit about it. I won't continue this numbers discussion in order to not make you look like an idiot. However, Mr. Familiar with box office numbers, can you let this forum know the drop percentage in money from Episode 4 to Episode V (Empire Strikes Back) and the drop % from Episode I to Episode II (AoTC). Then let us know why Empires Strikes Back is the worst movie ever, using your logic. Oh, and before you return with the stupid idea of avoiding the percentage drops and use only the raw numbers, I urge you to convert the 1981 US Dollars to today's adjusted numbers or you will be just another idiot thinking that Maths are only adding and subtracting. Please, enlighten us answering my questions, I dare you.
Oh! You haven't proved to anyone yet that the RT voting system cannot be manipulated. I am waiting for your excuse.
[quote]Movies like War for the Planet of the Apes and Blade Runner 2049 looked too good not to give it to them. [/quote]
As I said a the beginning of this thread, the Warner Brother Movies. Looked? What about sounded?