MovieChat Forums > ribtin > Replies
ribtin's Replies
No, it's not.
The consequences in terms of the aftermath in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were very important.
However the consequences in terms of Oppenheimer having some boring beurocratic license retracted is utterly insignificant.
Hell no! It's a woke-pandering nightmare. Stay away.
Very mediocre movie though...
You're joking, right? Please say you're joking!
uhm... yes? We've already seen each other naked, so why the hell would you worry about getting dressed?
Americans have such a bizarre fear of nudity.
Blah, blah, blah.
You lost.
Lick your wounds and move on.
What are you on about now? Changing your story?
You wrote: "None of the actors like it. None. They are forced."
I proved you wrong. Man up and admit your mistake.
<blockquote>None of the actors like it. None. They are forced.</blockquote>
This is just ludicrous, and easily proven to be 100% wrong.
Here's Keira Knightley who says she "finds sex scenes easy and is happy to take her clothes off if the role needs it":
https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/keira-knightley-finds-sex-scenes-1311604
Jennifer Lawrence "Didn’t Have a Second Thought" About Going Topless in Her New Movie:
https://www.menshealth.com/entertainment/a44357577/jennifer-lawrence-nude-scene-no-hard-feelings/
Miley Cyrus: "I don't really stress too much about being out there. There's nothing left to catch me doing. You want to hack my e-mail so you can find my nude pictures? I'll just fucking put them up."
https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/a15323/miley-cyrus-september-2015/
Shailene Woodley: ''I'm totally comfortable with nudity. I'm not sure it empowers me as an actress or anything, but if I'm going to do a movie with sex scenes, then I'm going to be naked, because I don't know about you, but I don't have sex with bras and panties on.''
https://eu.azcentral.com/story/entertainment/people/2015/02/26/shailene-woodley-confident-nudity/24070639/
Cameron Diaz: "I'm not opposed to doing nudity, as long as it's part of the story. I'll do whatever has to get done if it's the right thing."
https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/a11254/cameron-diaz-interview-cover-story/
.....
And that was just 5 quick examples. I could easily find 10000 more, but I think the point has been made.
But to say it clearly: Just because YOU have a problem with nudity, does not mean that everybody else does.
You really didn't understand my point did you?
She was naked. It was not a big deal, until you made it a big deal. Hence, the problem is not with her, but with you.
I feel bad for people who think it's somehow "wrong" to be naked.
When a couple sleeps together, they are very often naked. We all do it and it's completely normal.
Yet, in American movies, when there's a scene where a woman and man wakes up next to each other, 99 times out of 100 they are waking up in their underwear. Even in sex scenes, American films will actually have the woman wearing a bra!
In real life, people walk around naked all the time. We all have a body, and it's not always clothed.
Yet Hollywood insists on ruining the immersion by constantly showing people who are wearing clothes when it would be logical for their character to be naked. Now THAT is the true meaning of "gratuitous".
No, that's definitely not it.
Thanks for the suggestion though =)
Your ignorance is quite impressive.
I really hope you're trolling with this post. But the funny thing is that I can't really be sure.
The audacity of just asking a general question online if something "is foreign", without stating what country you are from yourself. /facepalm
Well said.
Mysterious Two (1982) was actually filmed as the pilot for a show called Follow Me if You Dare. However the show was not picked up. But I would love to know where the story went from there.
When he first wanders off from the Krusemarks, he wouldn't be "almost like a mental patient", but he would be an actual mental patient. After all, he did really just get busted out of some hospital.
So he would be extremely confused and almost empty inside at the very beginning. Maybe that is how he stumbled onto this older detective character who took pity on him (the book doesn't really tell).
However, the cocksure Angel that you see in the movie, would be some 15 years later, when he has had time to get back on his feet and gained some confidence through his trade as a detective.
He doesn't get the electric chair at the end though, but they only say he will:
"You're gonna fry Angel"
"Yes, I know. I'll burn in hell."
THE END
But the sequel picks up immediately after that, with Angel conveniently remembering he had a gun hidden in the bathroom. He then manages to kill one of the cops, and escape to France, where he goes to a lot of restaurants. And I do mean A LOT!
This is all down to his confusion and PTSD after the war. When he comes back, he doesn't know who he is. So he wouldn't know himself to be Favorite nor Angel.
However, when the Krusemarks drop him off at the place where Angel was abducted, is must have sparked some memory and he took up the life of Angel.
BTW, he actually has a whole bunch of different IDs which he uses in his detective work when he needs to pose as various characters. As far as I can remember, it's never specified how he would go about getting Angel's ID back, however even if he didn't manage to get it through official channels, he would have no problems just making it himself. This is also elaborated on in the sequel, where he falsifies a passport in order to flee to Paris.
I wish this platform had a like button.