MovieChat Forums > ribtin > Replies
ribtin's Replies
If you honestly don't see the difference, then that only reaffirms that there is something seriously wrong with your eyesight.
Haha, is that a screenshot taken on your phone? No wonder you had trouble seeing what was going on when you watched it in supershitty quality on a tiny screen =)
Here's pretty much the exact same shot, snagged directly from the raw file:
https://ibb.co/sFfd6kb
No problem seeing what is going on there. And here's 5 more dark scenes:
https://ibb.co/qJJnT3k
https://ibb.co/SdtwdGX
https://ibb.co/qsLHG9Z
https://ibb.co/tsnvp7t
https://ibb.co/3s7qGD8
If you're having trouble with those, then you should definitely get your eyes checked.
Nope. I actually thought the basement was rather bright, as there was supposed to be no sources of light. Had no problems seeing what was going on. There must have been something wrong with the copy you watched.
I saw it on a projector with an old bulb that is not very bright anymore. Still I did not have any problems seeing any parts of the movie.
His name was Robert Paulson
Reducing the movie to a "picture about big explosions" shows a total lack of understanding.
The interesting part of the story was never the explosion, but rather how they built the first nuclear bomb. Its construction demanded ingenuity and innovation in multiple fields and made for a fascinating story, of which there are not many movies at all.
The succeeding trial and Oppenheimer's supposed "fall from grace" was a completely meaningless and tacked-on melodrama that served of no importance. It would be a much better movie without it.
Auch, that sounds terrible!
I remember it was not uncommon for kids in grammar school to write these unbelievable stories as their homework assignments, only to end it with the "... and then I woke up, as it was it was all a dream" cop out.
But for grown adults to still stick to that lame excuse is laughable. And published authors should know better.
But then again... Stephen King has been known to do the same. *cough*<spoiler>The Dark Tower</spoiler>*cough*
<blockquote>You just know she'd let you put it anywhere.</blockquote>
Anywhere? Like under the fridge? On the shelf? In the aquarium?
Ok... you asked for it:
In Angel's Inferno, it is revealed that <spoiler>the devil is actually a just normal person who is appointed to serve as the ruler of hell. Only he's gotten tired of the job and is trying to get out of the deal. So he concocted this plan to make Harry Angel take his place. In other words: everything that happened was just a convoluted ploy to make Angel the new Lucifer. And to set this all up, the second book does a 180 on Harry's personality and turns him into a really unlikable asshole who goes around treating everyone he meets like trash.</spoiler>All of which kinda ruins the whole first book.
Whoosh!
Precisely! Mortensen's intention was obviously just to virtue signal by creating a "strong female character", as if that would somehow be worthwhile on its own.
The correct answer.
Nope. And nope.
The camera work is impressive at times. But that's about the only redeeming quality.
This roreyking person is just a troll. Don't waste your time and energy on him.
obvious trolling is obvious
You're the one who wanted to know ;)
The country of Europe? Hehe, nice trolling =)
You are so very, very wrong, on all accounts.
Most comics would never even think about stealing a joke, as they fully understand just how detrimental it is to their reputation and career. It completley ruined people like Carlos Mencia, who's ticket sales dropped 90% after he was exposed. And legends like Dave Attell is famous for calling up several other comics, just to double- and triple-check that nobody else has done a picece similar to a new joke he's just written.
Amy Schumer on the other hand (whom BTW has stolen many a joke from Dave Attell) always choses to play the victim, and claiming pepole only hate her "because I'm a woman" when she's continued to be caught stealing jokes, time after time after time. Which only makes her out to be even more of a disgusting human being.
This is part of it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eDxjxVl8S0
The "elves" are actually "Nisser" which are rooted in Norwegian folklore and have no english equivalent. They are simply translated into "elves" as there's no other english word for them.