Looks like Eco propaganda; Starts May 6
Hardly "world's worst man-made catastrophe", only 43 deaths (Wikipedia). Lying Green death-cult likes to inflate it.
shareBody count is not the only measure of catastrophe.
shareThriving wildlife is a positive. Only a tiny portion was a dead zone.
Doing research debunks much "radiation paranoia". We already knew no reactor containment is a big no-no.
Wildlife would also thrive if human civilization collapsed and we all died or re-wilded.
Chernobyl turned out to be not as bad as feared, but the long-term effects are what make it rank so highly.
What would you personally consider to be the worst man-made catastrophe, if not Chernobyl?
I hear global warming is it - is it true or not? I dunno.
The truth is, we do a lot of shit to this planet - pollute seas/oceans/air/cut down forests, etc -
I live in Asia and I can tell you right now that this region that serves as the world's factory does major damage to air/water. I can see this shit with a naked eye.
Chernobyl, on the other hand, actually became a safe haven for animals/plants from the human activity.
Lake Karachay in Russia is a quite interesting one. In the 90’s standing by this lake for an hour was enough time to get a lethal dose of radiation and then was the site of the largest concentration of open air radiation on the planet. People lived close by and down stream from this site for years and I even think it dried up once and a wind storm scattered radioactive dust for miles.
shareAlso... lets not forget that you recently posted easily debunked, essentially OUTRAGEOUS anti eco propaganda on the Trump board, and I didn't see you even reply to or acknowledge the numerous call-outs.
shareGo and live there.
share