Thoughts (and wishes)


1. I liked they included the Adrian Mellon scene and I understand anything that followed could have ruined the pace (even if I wish they had showed the interrogation scene or, at least, summed it up somehow)
2. Spotted Muschietti and Barbara, his sister (the producer) in two separate scenes, loved the casting of Brandon Crane (young Ben in the 1990 miniseries).
3. Glad they somehow had the Ritual of Chüd in (even if I wanted, as many fans, to see it play out as in the book)
4. Loved the whole Beverly and Ms Kersh scene (to me, one of the filthiest scenes in the novel) and the climax (in the theater, it had the same terrifying effect on me as the "Eggboy" scene in the first film) but I wanted more of Hansel & Gretel paranoia hinted at here and there (unless I missed something). Note: hair floating, just like in Muschietti's Mama. Nevertheless, great setup.
5. Liked the Paul Bunyan scene (even if I wanted the adult Richie to go through the experience like in the book)
6. Loved the The Thing reference (and David Clennon's line), the Stephen King's cameo, as well as Bogdanovich's.
7. Liked the scene at the carnival (with Bill and Dean), Beverly and Ben scenario and the way they got around the unfilmable book climax.

I didn't mind the CGI or movie length at all. In fact, it wouldn't have bothered me at all if it had run for another hour longer. I loved the adult actors (casting directors were genii) and Wallfisch's score.

All in all, a fun time.

reply

I agree with #6 ...and #4 mostly, but hated the CGI “witch” (it literally made me laugh, which I guarantee wasn’t the intent)

reply

To be honest, the Kersh Witch startled me when I saw it. I mean, Beverly is in the room with the pictures, hears the voice raising like that, and then the loud stomping coming from the pitch-black adjacent room and then that much taller monstrosity suddenly looms over her and bears down on her. If I were Beverly and that happened to me, I'd be squirming for cover, too!

reply

Sure, up until we see "it" charging out of the darkness the scene was scary.
IMO, CGI wasn't required for that scene ...at least not to that extent. A little over the top.

reply

What CGI? Only for the face and neck, I think.

The IT movies used the talents of Javier Botet to play the Leper/Hobo and in this movie, the Witch, too:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-48266431

In the Kersh sequence, the physical performance was all Botet's, I think they simply made him bigger with CGI to dwarf Beverly, but it was all a real-live performance. The Hobo was all real, except with some CGI substitutions on the face to enhance the grisly look. Even the Painted Lady from Chapter One was played by a real person, again just substituting the face with the twisted face of the painting.

Even the "Winter Fire" Beverly with the burning head was played by a real person with prosthetics, with CGI flames added.

The Hockstetter ghoul (the one who drives Bowers around) was the actual original Hockstetter actor, but again with facial prosthetics enhanced by CGI.

Muschietti used a mixture of practical and CGI, but mostly practical, whenever he could. Obviously, some really outlandish stuff couldn't be practical, but then IT can shapeshift into anything, so any horrors of the mind are possible that shouldn't exist.

reply

I liked Eggboy when he had the eggs and no head, and the jerky undead motion of the limbs, but it looked silly when it was Pennywise saying "eggboy" to Ben with that goofy appearance he had, it just looked odd.

reply