True East Murder
The first two episodes "True East Parts 1&2" where two young men are found guilty of killing on of two's families.
Before i watched it i seen a lot of people over social media say they definitely did it...
I'm completely baffled as to how people have come to that conclusion if they watched both parts and actually paid attention. I think the evidence is pretty clear that they did not commit the murders and they were absolutely pressured into confession through intimidation and fear.
If they couldn't get let off with an inconsistent alibi then how can they be found guilty with an inconsistent confession?
I personally thought they were guilty throughout the first episode - the second episode makes their innocence much clearer.