if the new Charlies Angels had Charlize, Nicole, Margot ?
Would it have still bombed?
I mean they would've been a pretty big deal for a new CA , I think ppl would've turned out for it like they did for the 2000 CA
Would it have still bombed?
I mean they would've been a pretty big deal for a new CA , I think ppl would've turned out for it like they did for the 2000 CA
I love this idea but....I can't imagine any of these women being a brunette. Margot and Charlize are famous for being blondes and Nicole is the red-head imo.
shareWasn't Robbie a brunette in that post apocalyptic movie with chris pine. Also Charlize had dark hair in Aeon Flux. And come to think of it Kidman was a brunette in something too
shareI know some/all of these actresses have gone brunette for one role or another but, I was just thinking of their iconic looks and also how I think they look the sexiest.
shareif they were to have done CA instead of Metoo movie theyd have all had multiple different looks, outfits, hairdos blonde/brunette/redhead. all trying to outsexy each other . maybe Charlize could've had the Fox tv lady makeup for some spy scene lol
share"Wasn't Robbie a brunette in that post apocalyptic movie with chris pine."
Z for Zacharia, and yes she was indeed. No less beautiful for it, either.
At 30, 45 and 53 respectively, I don't think a Robbie, Theron and Kidman starring Charlie's Angles would work at all. A cute proposition, but no.
Ironically, I'm watching a movie right now with Nicole as a brunette. (Destroyer)
shareA great combination of talented actress's but it would be attacked by pc nuts.SJW's don't care about talent they care about their silly quotas.And that cast is a little too white for them to handle.
sharetrue. but I bet Charlize/Nicole/Margot CA would've safely quadrupled what the current CA made
share