Thrilled so many people liked this film and not here to try and change anyone's mind, BUT I FEEL LIKE I'M TAKING CRAZY PILLS.
Baffled by the almost universal admiration for this. I thought it was a hackneyed rehash, with broad, tired gags that didn't really land, a weak script and - I seem to be alone in this - a pretty unnatural performance from the kid playing Ricky.
Story-wise, there was so little to it, just a series of episodes involving disposable wacky characters. For me the emotional beats just didn't convince in the way that, say, they do in the clueless kid-grizzled curmudgeon dynamic in Bad Santa.
It was beautifully shot and Sam Neil was reliably brilliant, but otherwise a total miss. Again, as someone will no doubt point out this is my opinion, but I'm curious to know whether anyone had a similar reaction...
Or if anyone passionately disagrees with what I've said?
Sort of agree. Liked the first half hour or so, then the tone of the movie seemed to get too farcical. The swat teams creeping through the woods, the car chases (I guess calling up "Thelma & Louise") all just created this feeling of watching a comedy skit, thus divesting the movie of any poignancy it might otherwise have had.
The wise-cracking kid never seemed real to me, just some adult's scripting of a funny, clever, kid for curmudgeon Sam Neil to play off of. And the scene in the bunk beds where the kid says his mother must not have wanted (or loved, can't remember - either will work) him, and Hector reassures him she was just young etc. - was embarrassingly predictable and trite.
Beautiful scenery and Sam Neil; as they say, a missed opportunity.
Here's the deal and it's obvious (and contrite and predictable): Different strokes for different folks. I, myself, am OVER THE MOON about this film!!! I saw it 3 times on the big screen and it got better with each viewing. Let me be clear, I loved it the first time -- that's why I went two more times. I would have gone again but it only played for 2 weeks.
But...I think I understand where you are coming from -- you didn't enjoy it, didn't like it and you just want some kind of validation. You didn't really need people to respond with all of their reasons why they loved it. I mean, come on, all you have to do is read the reviews written about it. But, hey, you were decent about your critique about it and you can't deny how you feel. And...you got a few like-minded people to respond. Feelings and viewpoint validated.
So....while I know you aren't really interested in my take in it, just the same, I am going to expound. I loved everything about this movie (check ratings breakdown of IMDb users -- women liked this one more than men, but both are high). It was pure escapism for me. It was a feast for the eye, I loved the music, I thought the acting was pretty much flawless (actor playing Ricky Baker did have a moment or two that I didn't feel were exactly "spot on" -- if I were to be extremely critical, but he MORE than made up for those 1 or 2 moments by the rest of his performance). But...probably what I was impressed with the most was the pacing, and the overall style of the director. It was just so much fun...pure and simple. I left the theater and I was beaming. Just so happy inside. That's what I want when I go see a film and it seldom happens. Thank you Taika Waititi...
Well, if you break down every movie to its core, it will seem formulaic. Personally, I thought the movie was great until they found that diabetes guy. It went downhill from that point on. The family, then that ridiculous scene with the fake-looking pig, the bush guy and of course the chase in the end... At some point it just became too unrealistic that they would be able to hide for such a long time. It was a low-key movie in every way until they brought soldiers etc. I still think it's a good movie though.
With such utter crap at the theatre, a lightweight gem like this one shines even brighter. While Hollywood will probably continue to bring out 70's retreads (Barnaby Jones, anyone?), thankfully there is another universe where quality stories can be told.
Yes, there are some themes we have seen in other movies, but there has been thousands of movies made over the years and it is nearly impossible to make a movie in the modern era without at least a little of that happening, but aimless? That criticism is way off base.
And yes, just like with any other variable, opinions follow a distribution, and in this instance, yours in the lower left tail.
I love it because it is not Marvel/DC. Anything that has original/unique story will stand out against city destroying dudes/gals wearing spandex and capes.
I believe that was the point of it. The kid has treated the adventure as a movie and was role playing it until they got caught, because he had a lot of fun (regarding the cliche sentence).
Though I liked this movie a lot and I find quite humorous and fun to watch. The character relationship is quite nice and the whole thing was done in a style that represents as an adventure story.