MovieChat Forums > The Monster (2016) Discussion > Rotten Tomatoes was wrong, The Monster s...

Rotten Tomatoes was wrong, The Monster sucked


This film is 78 on RT, which is why I gave it a chance. How any film critic could recommend this is beyond my comprehension. 90 minutes of a girl crying, which gets highly irritating, causing me to hope she dies. Film isn't scary or suspenseful. This film also lacks originality and bring nothing at all to the horror genre. Shame on the critics for saying this was a good film.

Movie is also implausible. If you hit a large animal, while driving in a car, the animal will die. If the carcass is no longer there, nobody would think the animal survived the attack, only to go crawling into the woods. Only logical explanation, is that something else is out there very large and dangerous, and the only logical reaction is to get out of there as quickly as possible. Nobody would hang around, waiting for the tow guy to work on their crashed car.

reply

I agree, it's garbage. How was this rated to highly, bribed critics?

reply

1 out of 10.

I know 3 million is a very small budget, but I can't see how this film cost more than $50,000.

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

reply

you know what ? rotten tomatoes sucks balls, never..i repeat NEVER listen to a rotten tomatoe, their reviews are either bought or plain stupid, this movie sucked balls BIG TIME, and we all know it

reply

that was one flammable monster

reply