In this film, would you classify the two young main ladies as villains?
Or anti-heroines as such? And Keanu Reeves' character is a good guy, right?
shareOr anti-heroines as such? And Keanu Reeves' character is a good guy, right?
shareIf the story was genderbent and those two ladies were men, nobody would doubt their villainousness. Feminism rules!
shareI dare say, I didn't even necessarily think along those lines, just asked a question out of personal curiosity, thank you. Even so, there are various gradations to male characters in films that occasionally go beyond good and bad, there's anti-heroes, antagonists, protagonists etc, just wondered what other people thought, that's all.
shareAnd plus, we are often USED to films with them being "gender bent" as such (by the way, the word "genderbent" when typed comes up as incorrectly spelled) hence why you often don't see questioning involved. And I actually didn't mean so much if they are good or bad but rather what are they in terms of characters in cinematic terminology?
Plus - at least one of the ladies has revealed to have a traumatic past related to childhood abuse of a particularly sensitive nature and Reeves' character himself was called unlikeable, a cheat etc by certain audience members.
Nothing to do with pro or anti feminism here, although having said that, given the scale of the social issues this movie tries to deal with as opposed to merely simple horror story of villains and potential survivors (although it does involve that and has that vibe in it sometimes too), I can see why focus and social groups etc get involved in discussing such matters whereas they rarely come up for themes including say murder and killings etc. And - that's just the way it is in this world, right?
Anyways... (drum dum dum...) ...
"Feminism rules" - you forgot to add - at times both loudly AND subtly, so much, that people who may not even KNOW what it is or understand its meaning, feel its effects without even REALIZING it, lol. :)
shareWould you also say they were both EVIL? Or just say, flawed and psychologically damaged? Or both?
shareThere's no such thing as evil - stop reading the bible.
shareOr, for that matter, since I'm not even a religious person and last time I read the bible was about 25 years ago (literally!), stop watching too many ACTION movies and say read or watch fairytales, life, for ONE, is never THAT simple. Yes?
Also, 2 loser (no offense, just referencing your username), as welcome as you are, you don't necessarily have to say "reverse the genders" or bring "feminism" too much into the mix as if to say it surrounded the thoughts of all of us like that without us even realizing it.
You could simply judge the matter on its own OR - as paradoxical as it may sound, even if its a little less TACTFUL, you could ask if I am simply STUPID although I admit the question was somewhat METAPHORICAL as well.
Plus, even film characters could be other than heroes and villains and good and evil. Antagonists and protagonists. Anti-heroes. Troubled people turning to dark sides. And the film may not even encourage us to take sides but just tell a story or explore a situation or even darkly satirize it at least like partially here.
OK - I admit, there's such a thing as good and evil in fairy tales as well - not just the bible.
shareAnd action movies, and to an extent, real life as well.
shareAlso, to a very "minor" extent at least, whether by "law" or "morality" or "common sense" or dictionary "definitions", and let's exclude all kinds of even positive or double standard oriented stupidity, unfairness, prejudice, various "isms" etc, this movie can also ask if we are to treat male and female err "villains" or "antagonists" different or same or similar for related offenses, or "crimes" etc than their typically well recognized male counterparts.
Although one could answer in serious matters like this at least possibly yes.
Also interesting, some viewers have debated that even before official de-facto err acts of sexual gender reversal assault or the dreaded "r" word, the ladies have already did something to him that could be classified as "it" or something similar when they didn't get "100% explicit approval of sex from him", which could at least be considered harassment and in practice an offense at least under de-facto LAW, but some have debated it, what they do to him afterwards falls under it and even physical torture etc.
So in some ways, maybe they went from normal or naughty to downright evil or bad etc and did acts or actions to qualify them as such. So I suppose yeah you could consider them female VILLAINS.
Feminism is a cancer!
shareI thought they were villains without question.
shareAnd not just say anti-heroes or anti-heroines? (By the way, do you know what an anti-hero is acid?)
shareI'd consider Ellen/Elliot Page's character in Hard Candy as an anti-hero. Anti-hero and Antagonist. Patrick Wilson is Villain and Protagonist.
With Knock Knock, I really just felt the girls were Villains/Antagonist, straight up.
Random but have you seen this movie: https://moviechat.org/tt4178092/The-Gift
Yes I have seen both "Hard Candy" (2005) and "The Gift" (2015) as well, latter being a pretty good film. I also have to say that its line about "being through with the past, but past maybe not being through with us" seems to have been influenced by an almost the same line in "Magnolia" (1999).
And don't forget arguably THE biggest example of an ANTI-HERO - Robert De Niro's character of Travis Bickle in Martin Scorsese's great cinematic masterpiece "Taxi Driver" (1976), one of the greatest films of all time.
THE GIRLS ARE VILLAINS...PURE AND SIMPLE...ALL YOUR NEW AGE WISHY WASHY POSTING WON'T CHANGE THAT.
shareAnd I don't plan on "changing" anything even if it was "theoretically possible".
shareOH?...MY BAD...DID I USE A WRONG WORD?...YOUR STYLE IS IRRITATING.
THE GIRLS ARE VILLAINS...PURE AND SIMPLE...ALL YOUR NEW AGE WISHY WASHY POSTING CANNOT OBSCURE OR ALTER THAT FACT....THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE PERSPECTIVE.
No no that's alright, I wasn't disagreeing. Irritating? Sorry, but I am what I am?
shareI guess me being curious and having English as my second language can have that "irritating" effect on some even without me deliberately trying.
shareHow would you characterize the cast of The Gift in terms of hero/villain?
I have to shamefully admit that I've never actually seen Taxi Driver...but you've reminded me that I ought to.
I'm guessing the main character in The Gift is sort of an anti-hero whereas the bad guy that terrorizes him and his wife is somewhat of a villain or at least a higher anti-hero and the wife an innocent victim.
Yes, do check out Taxi Driver at any cost as it really is a masterpiece, very thought provoking and disturbing and damn great film just all round.
I have a friend who I've been watching movies regularly with, gonna add Taxi Driver to the list.
But yeah, I find that the character labeling in The Gift is a bit more ambiguous than Knock Knock, which is why I brought it up.
I would personally see that the movie doesn't really have any heroes myself, just villains, and yes, the wife is a victim.
Speaking of heroes and anti-heroes and villains etc.
You seen "Silence of the Lambs" (1991)? In that film, while he is technically a cannibal and a mass murderer, the character of Hannibal Lecter, played by Anthony Hopkins, is actually considered somewhat of an anti-hero and many audiences even find him somewhat likeable despite his deeds and whatnot.
I wonder - how would he or someone of his caliber see the two female characters in Knock Knock (2015), also, given that they are female, would he interfere in any way even on a more restrained level than he would were he to face their male villain equivalents? Remember how he made Miggs swallow his own tongue after a particularly offensive case of misconduct against Jodie Foster's character in that film? OK let's not get TOO you know, or maybe who knows, he'll secretly anonymously call the police and get the hell out before he gets caught, maybe Keanu Reeves' character would recognize him?
I think that's where we differ. I have never considered Hannibal to be an anti-hero at all, regardless of the positive things he's done for the police for, and for Jodie Foster.
shareThey were full on villians. I mean did you see how they were eating pancake?
shareLMAO
shareTrue, ALSO - I didn't meant to imply that they were good or anything, or even, not guilty of crime and immoral deeds, and they weren't exactly well likeable either, I suppose they were psychopaths or damaged individuals and whatnot. But rather - as characters, what would they be classified as in cinematic terms, including antagonists, anti-heroes etc or just villains?
Plus, how did that in itself make you feel, within the context of this movie? I read different reviews and people well WERE polarized, see one of my other recent threads on it. Even if, well, there may indeed only be one correct answer to this.
Also - yeah, we have at least sometimes, including male, and sometimes female also, seen anti-heroes who may have done wrong deeds and even committed crimes, and not necessarily out of vengeance against those worse than them, but we as audience were allowed to feel differently, sometimes maybe even root for them, in other cases simply understand them and NOT take "sides", and they ended up getting away with it. Hence why I also asked about how people may feel here.
But then in SOME cases at least, its Occar Razor choice of the most obvious, and in today's internet day and age, NOT that I am complaining, it comes more closely to light that way.
Also, SPOILER, the fact that they ultimately get away at the end - was that simply them being manipulative and smart OR was the film somewhat WANTING us as audience say not for them to pay or suffer too much for or despite what they did, either as part of dark satire or black comedy, feminist statement of some sort (i.e. even bad women should not be hurt or killed like that with a vengeance - and by the way, in case you think I or someone is TOO defensive of women who also do wrongful deeds, Michael Haneke's film "Funny Games" (1997) was arguing along similar lines when Anna shot that MALE captor/killer, making a statement in his speech about "audience cheering murder" even if she did it out of self defense and against a very unlikable psychotic murderous thug) or maybe Eli Roth hopes one day he or someone can make a sequel to it?
And did THAT bother you too much or at all? (Even if, like me, you didn't think too much of the film overall and 5/10 for instance is what I give it.)
Absolutely, the pancake scene is repulsive. Aunt Jemima is rolling on her grave.
share2 Kowalski and Evoken - I challenge you one day to watch director William Morgan's Ed Wood's scripted "The Violent Years" (1956) (yes, it really is a 50s movie) that involve young girls going on a massive crime spree that also involves r... or s-ally a-ulting male victims (!), robberies, murders, cop killings etc but I would imagine without any doubt whatsoever, you would have no trouble classifying the gang of girl criminals as not ONLY err antagonists and anti-heroes, but straight villains.
Also, in that film, MAYBE because she is a woman who is not USUALLY known for committing such CRIMinal and IMMORAL acts, or MAYBE because of how she ALSO suffers as a result (the pregnancy) or MAYBE for something ELSE, but at the END of that film, SPOILER (hope neither of you hold a grudge), the lead character DIES before going to jail, I will avoid further spoilers (the police DON'T kill her and she doesn't commit suicide there), but the film sort of suggests that we MAY feel sorry for her, as DRAMATIC music plays and parents' GRIEF is SHOWN there.
Though I have to say, its essentially a D if not a Z grade ultra silly 50s black and white trashy black comedy, not intended to be taken too seriously, and it was written by ED WOOD (I'm sure you KNOW who that is, Plan 9 From Outer Space, Glen or Glenda et all) and Knock Knock in some ways is like a 2010's version of it.
Whether or not you'll like it is up to you, maybe Eli Roth would. I think John Waters did. And the band Ministry sampled its "I don't care" line in one of their songs.
I was expecting a reveal at the end that would leave no doubt about the Keanu Reeves character REALLY being a pedophile who abused his own daughter. Then the girls would have been anti-heroines. Without that, there is absolutely no reason to see them as anything but villains, and demented villains at that.
Besides, they already had a de-facto child molester character in "Hard Candy" (2005) and I think Eli Roth was going for some "originality" in here.
shareThe husband cheated so he was a villain just like the 2 women were
share