One of the things I didn't like nor agree with is Chuck's opening testimony on the law. It's just not for attorneys that the law is important. We have the public, the judge, jury, law enforcement and the justice system who have to uphold the rule. One can't just have the law or it could be someone acts as the judge, jury and executioner. That's what Chuck seems to be implying, that he is a judge for this law. The law is not for one side nor the other, but for both sides. In other words, it could be a double-edged sword even if you win the case and the law favors you. There could be another case where the same law does not favor you. What Chuck is doing is assuming the role of a prosecutor in interpreting the law. Just his testimony alone shows his bias. What he should have said was that he was interested is seeing justice was served, i.e. the commissioners saw that there was the law for attorneys broken in this case and that they should uphold the law and provide justice. Chuck has said his spiel other times during the show and it just goes to demonstrate that he is a sanctimonious prick.
reply
share