MovieChat Forums > Heretic (2024) Discussion > Stopped watching after the Bible-Torah c...

Stopped watching after the Bible-Torah comparison

posted a month ago by Carlo (121)
63 replies | jump to latest

So whoever wrote this movie is probably a secular atheist, and the lines pronounced by Hugh Grant at the beginning strongly suggest that. Anyway, when Grant analyzes the three monoteistic religions, he pretends that the Bible is the theft of another religion, Judaism, and compares the former with the Torah. So whoever wrote this movie doesn't even know that Judaism does not follow the teachings of the Torah anymore. Modern Judaism is founded upon two books now: the Talmud and the Kabbalah, which are both esoteric and deeply antiChristian. By the way, the Torah contains only some parts of the old Testament. The BIble has also the New Testament, which is the Gospels and the Acts of the Apostles. I guess they were too absorbed by their antiChristian ideas to know it...

[–] Satan2016 (25878) 22 days ago

The OP is a fucking NAZI who posts anti-Semitic tropes.
https://moviechat.org/tt26625693/The-Order/676d1799038a811b85ace4bf/Another-antiwhite-movie-written-by-Jews

[–] Carlo (121) 22 days ago

Lol. You're really pathetic. In that post I also condemn Nazism. Nazism is an esoteric pagan cult. Anyway, are you going to call the principal or what?
"Oh sir, I'm a satanic pussy and I can't stand someone who can debate me."

[–] alex321 (73) 7 days ago

So you stopped watching a movie because you disagree with what a character is saying? Or you think the filmmakers are feeding you their own bias through the character, rather.

1) If they wanted to force their interpretation of religion through a character why would they make him the antagonist?

2) Have you considered that, perhaps, the filmmakers are not sharing their beliefs to the viewers but it is the beliefs of the character that they created and that he could be wrong?

3) If you watch the movie to the end, you would realize that it is not an "anti-Christian" or even an anti-religion movie.

[–] Carlo (121) 5 days ago

"So you stopped watching a movie because you disagree with what a character is saying? Or you think the filmmakers are feeding you their own bias through the character, rather."

The latter.
1) It's not the first time that the antagonist is used to convey the ideas of the screenwriters. This happens when the antagonist is considered a more intriguing and smarter character
than the protagonists;
2) Filmakers are atheists. You can find more information about them online;
3) The first half, to me, is enough to reject the bias of the screenwriters.

[–] DancingintheDark (1736) 2 days ago

Reed is obviously full of shit, he knows enough to formulate informed opinions but is clearly an overtly biased individual who picks and chooses which facts to present fairly and which to manipulate to his cause.
Fudge me, are you able to just watch a film and take the characters as they are or do you nitpick apart every film you watch?

[–] Carlo (121) 2 days ago

"he knows enough to formulate informed opinions"

Do you even know what you're talking about? It looks like you know anything about religions and the points that I made. I didn't "manipulate" everything. I pointed out all the lies that the screenwriters put in this movies.

"do you nitpick apart every film you watch?"

Nitpick means looking for small faults, while I stressed that the entire movie is the result of an atheist biased view. However, to answer your question: if a movie is shit, I stop watching it, but if you like it, you can eat it. Help yourself.

[–] johnnybiscotti (481) a day ago

"I stopped watching the movie because the villain character challenged my beliefs."