Usually I think Emma is a pretty girl, however any poster or photo I've seen of this film her face looks so chiseled and homely. I'm actually disappointed they chose her to play the role, she just doesn't seem to fit. Who do you think would have been a better choice?
shareShe's pretty but that's about it. Acting has never been her strong suit. I mean, she has two expressions: concerned and smiling vaguely.
shareHer acting and singing is spot on.
shareI agree. She could do modeling but she should forget trying to make a career out of acting unless she does a lot of studying in the field where we don't have to see her growing pains.
shareAh . . .she's a millionaire from acting. Even though it was mostly from acting as a child actor on a money train, she's a millionaire from acting nonetheless. Her career as an actor is successfully made.
shareI think she is a very good actress and she sung just fine. Leave her alone.
I'm trying to go for an engaging, funny youtube channel so, if you have the time, take a look. Hope you enjoy what you see. Thanks in advance. A review of the movie here https://youtu.be/AD4MjlFtI4k
Anybody
shareEmma Watson is perfect casting for Belle.
But I think Kristen Stewart would rock as her.
Lily Collins
Olivia Cooke
10-years ago...
Jessica Alba
Minka Kelly
At at first, when I saw she had been cast, I questioned it. But then I read she was born in France. So I understand in part why she was picked. Honour the material. So I'm okay with it.
The only thing I really have a problem with is the Beast not looking very dangerous at all. Not gruesome enough for my tastes.
[deleted]