MovieChat Forums > Jagten (2012) Discussion > Would you consider this movie to still b...

Would you consider this movie to still be about...


... child abuse as such, including of that nature, even IF, SPOILERS ALERT - it deals strictly with an adult who was mistakenly accused of being the perpetrator of such a deed, and had to suffer social and communal consequences himself as a result?

And can you watch this movie well as a movie anyways with either factor in mind?

Also, I have read online, controversies on this film don't quieten down even in spite of its acclaim, that people who may watch it and say do so wrongly and they may get told in an argument - "You've just watched a film about a horrifying child abuse" - even though this movie is strongly about a false accusation as such.

And once again, even knowing that, can this movie be judged thematically strictly on its own? Granted, everyone I am sure knows even without "The Hunt" in existence how on its own, for very direct reasons, serious and awful such issue of child abuse as such is, but a film that dares for a moment to look at the opposite aspect (in ways we say know murder is terrible yes, but films have been made about people wrongly or mistakenly accused of being murderers, in cases where a murder may or may not have happened, you get the drift) that may also have happened, in however small amounts, that doesn't make it wrong, that doesn't mean a movie is selfishly denying harsh and typical common reality or is being insensitive in any way alone, right?

(Also, for all the talks about social consequences for victims even child ones of such abuse as well as presence of fear in them in "reporting" perpetrators, I myself even without having knowledges of those aspects fully ALREADY knew how terrible, "taboo" and sensitive this issue is in direct cases, through word of mouth and angry talks about various ways people feel "unpleasantness" towards the perps as such. Of course, I also knew that murder ends one's LIFE too.)

Also, some viewers have argued that to some extent, albeit not s-ally ala with an actual child molester, the young girl Klara, even though she made a mistake by saying what she did after hearing her brother's friend say those things, was also in a way a victim and that what her friend also did with that ipad can be considered abuse. That may indeed be true to an extent, yes, but its also not to the same degree as the actual child molestation act is in the way, right? Although its still wrong and yes he should've been confronted for it.

And I know its a touchy issue but still... And I have read some people after this movie say they dislike kids and whatnot, but for one, wasn't it the adults who both handled the situation poorly and later victimised Lucas undeservedly for it with threats and acts of physical violence? And THIS movie for one WASN'T trying to deliver a message on any order of "look at how bad and wrong kids can be", right? So its like, some viewers also got this movie's message wrong as well. But anyways...

Personally, I think its a little bit of that but mostly a movie about wrongful accusation and what consequences it may lead and how in an overall big picture it is also unhelpful but in its own way.

reply

Also, here's another point.

I have read some reviews and comments elsewhere from people who after seeing this movie they easily came, without thinking twice and without having even remotely any worries on their conscience, stuff along the lines of "This is why I dislike kids" etc and various similar varieties. Now...

Besides how wrong and in some ways inappropriately disrespectable such comments can be, I also have to ask...

Based on everything we saw in this movie especially if watched carefully and with attention, EVEN IF for whatever reason some people feel they have a problem with kids in general...

Did this movie NOT, perhaps, give you OTHER thoughts and impressions, given how, and it was even made rather clear here, that it was the ADULTS who were ultimately responsible for the mess than entailed later afterwards and that instead of disliking kids in general and publicly announcing IT, after this movie, the thoughts that perhaps should've been provoked instead were...

How situations like this for instance, especially if there's no total evidence that this is what actually happened, are ought to be HANDLED and that people including adults should take time and not jump to any wrong immediate CONCLUSIONS?

But why weren't any of THOSE thoughts provoked in THOSE audiences, especially since, writer and director quite possibly DID intend for them to be thought of in that way, besides of course making a movie that simply "tells this type of story" and also with it being a massively ACCLAIMED movie overall?

reply

I have also read some theories that one of the main reasons the main character continued to be victimized was not so much because certain people still didn't believe in his innocence but rather that the overall situation somehow appealed to their basic ego and that they couldn't allow themselves to control their impulses somehow, they were basically being like school bully kids in adult skin.

reply