Do you think that makes them evil as well as wrong?
Granted, they suspected that man of child molesting and went incredibly mad as a result attacking him, terrorizing his family, pointing fingers at him, killing his dog and other matters. That is in itself no doubt wrong and was also unhelpful in any overall picture.
But then, child molestation as an act is in itself incredibly evil and among the absolute worst criminal offenses known to man. And what's more, in real life sadly, they often do end up getting away with it for one reason or another, in today's day and age as well, its impossible to deny it given how internet helps us easily to find available information.
But do you think that them attacking him BECAUSE of them believing he is a guilty child molester ALSO makes them wrong and evil or is them suspecting him of such is a mitigating factor that, as incorrect as they are, makes them somewhat understandable.
And what do you think about the fact that, as uneven as the whole situation is in life, that for some matters, even with a lack of conclusive evidence and whatnot, it can cause some people, as we see in this movie, to become so mad and capable of unleashing physical and other acts of violence towards the suspecting party like that?
Basically in a nutshell, who do you think are the heroes and villains of this rather complex story or is it also unfortunate that matters like this don't have an easy and satisfying enough answer and that this is basically another sad fact of life where good doesn't defeat evil and evil doesn't get it and some matters also have shades of grey and complexities to them but are overall still not right either - and they don't solve certainly the overall ACTUAL matters of official child abuse as such?
Cheers.