the hunt, the ending
]i am very curious what or rather who people thought took the last shot in last scene at LUCAS[/b]
share]i am very curious what or rather who people thought took the last shot in last scene at LUCAS[/b]
shareHi,
I think that Klara's brother who shot the rifle
In the celebration ceremony scene, when Lucas looked around the room, the eyes contact with Clara's brother was odd.
I can't describe it more, I am sorry. I am not English native.
Just watch the scene again and you will see.
hey all, I really think its Klaras mom!
You know I kept thinking about this a lot.
And I figured when the Theo and the family was outside the grocery store waiting and looking at Lucas walk in pain, Klara asked "where is Fanny?" and the edit went straight to the mom as she said "I don't know." And it sounded a lost like guilt where maybe she possibly killed the dog or was involved somehow. And when Theo wanted to give Lucas food on Christmas she was clearly upset and hurt. She probably never forgave Lucas and still thinks he did it, and Grethe told her "children can't remember traumatic stuff…or something"
And towards the end of the film, we never see her with the others, and she would be expected to be out hunting with the son and fathers so her appearance to Lucas may have just been her and a warning. Or something along that line.
I actually thought it was his own son! (Am I too cynical?) I really thought so, because the silhouette was small, seemingly belonging to a teenager. The boy, who stood by his father all along, maybe accumulated suspicion deep down and it was his way of secretly relieving that accumulation.
shareHe seemed to be one defending him the most. I dont see it. He knew it wasn't true, so I dont understand why he would shoot him.
shareI agree. My first thought was the son. They even showed the action of the bolt in a scene before, was that foreshadowing? Maybe the son saw Lucas pick up Klara earlier and was firing a warning shot, so to speak.
shareAre you joking? The show is to show that he is never safe, at the 1 year later meeting people still believed he was the pedophile. His son would never shoot him you *beep* idiot. It's not a complex movie.
shareyes, loved the film's tension, and the proposition, because I have considered b4 how unthinkable and horrific it would be for anybody to be falsely accused of being a child molester...I think the film captures well the consequences and ramifications..
But the end hunt scene
--(and I think the ending of the film was too hurried, period..instead of so much being made of the Scandinavian hunter's bar-mitzvar ritual, we needed to know how the town getting back to Lucas looked)--
WTF...who put a bullet into the tree near his head, and what was this to convey?
that still maybe this long after Lucas' exonneration, some people still did not get with the program?
absolutly what I thought. The gap between christmas and next october would have been more interesting than this "hunter-bar-mitzwar". I would have loved to see
Grethe come to senses again. then anyway I think vinterberg did well by leaving us understand that the society will ever have doubts and nobody really apologizes.
It WAS NOT in his head. It happened. And it could be anybody - that's the point. What it's meant to show is that once you get the dirt on your name, you'll never clean it again, no matter what. His life, and practically his son's life too, is completely ruined for all time. And that's the power of one mean word - the deadliest weapon of all.
shareI subscribe to the theory others have posted here that the shot was real. It doesn't matter who the shooter was - the point being that for some people his name will never be cleared - he will always be guilty.
For your information, on the DVD version of "The Hunt", an alternate ending is included (similar to but obviously not the one used in the film). In the alternate, the shooter hits his mark, striking Lucas in the chest (in the heart). Lucas dies instantly collapsing to the leaf-covered forest floor where he lies motionless. The shooter flees as before and the woods remain silent. I think this alternate ending supports the fact that we too are viewing reality with the theatrical ending.
[deleted]
I believe Lucas was guilty and Marcus knew it. He found a pair of undies and asked his father about them. I think the undies belonged to the little girl and Marcus believe that too.
shareHere's hope you are trying to make a joke.
Can.You.Hear.Me?
Hell yes!
****
For me, it just means that it is never the same anymore.
shareFor me it symbolises his role in the story. He may be participating in the hunt (a symbol of his life), but he is not the hunter. He has felt what it is like to be hunted and his life will never be the same again. He is now like the deer, always on the lookout, dreading what may surface, even if everything seems to be fine.
It might have been a misfire, but after what has passed he saw it as a direct hit on himself. Out of fear, he thought the culprit was standing right over him, but on a second look there was no one there.
He is the prey.
Quot homines, tot sententiae.