the hunt, the ending
]i am very curious what or rather who people thought took the last shot in last scene at LUCAS[/b]
share]i am very curious what or rather who people thought took the last shot in last scene at LUCAS[/b]
shareSome say that it was all in his head
I don't buy it tho, and I don't think Vinterberg ever established that kind of narrative in the film
Its a very real and documentary feel like film, where subjective things like that never happen
Who? I don't know :[
Some say that it was the brother who supposedly was abusing Klara all along
I think Vinterberg left it open, as a reminder that in this kind of cases, we never really known it all, some things are always kept hidden, regretfully
C'mon guys!!
It was just his fear to be still not accepted...
I think in the community the suspect will always snake in theri minds...
Are u relly losing time trying to undertand who is the silhoutte? hahahaha
I can't believe it
I am not a native English speaker, so please be patient with me if there's something odd :)
It is symbolism that "The Hunt" is never over. Even if cleared of all charges, you'll likely never be free of it. That is why the shooter isn't shown, as it doesn't matter who he/she is, it captures the true ending for these stories in one dark moment.
share[deleted]
[deleted]
I think the point is that it doesn't matter - that despite everything being superficially back to normal, the whole incident is still hanging over them and he's always going to be looking over his shoulder. So I wouldn't say "in his head", but I think it was more symbolic rather than literal.
shareI've always thought that it was the big, ogre looking guy that slaps up his son whenever his son tries to talk to Klara at her house. He just always seemed to have his mind made up about Lucas. In the end before the hunting ceremony you can see they shake hands but he is not too thrilled about it. But that's just my theory.
Like the above person said, I don't think it matters who took the shot. The implications of that shot is what's important.
I just assumed that it was someone who still doesn't believe Lucas' innocence.
shareFor me it's hard to tell if it was a hallucination or if it was real. Nonetheless if it was real, the person could of easily killed him.
But his goal was just to scare Lucas.
could of easily killed himcould HAVE easily killed him share
could easily have killed him, actually 😀
shareNo, it is either "could've easily killed him" or "could easily kill him". First one suits the situation better.
Why are you guys trying to correct each other if you are not good in that language yourself?
There was nothing wrong with my correction. The original quote was:
Nonetheless if it was real, the person could of easily killed him.and my correction:
I read that as "could easily killed him", I guess if you edited I would see it on the board. My bad, it seems i skipped "have".
sharePerhaps I'm just unimaginative, but I thought it was their way of highlighting the fact that these sorts of situations never truly end. I'm totally up for believing that it had a deeper symbolic meaning but I personally thought it was the viewers chance to share a very harsh realization with Lucas.
shareMy interpretation was that the shot was obviously real, but that silhouette kind of represented anyone who thought he did.
With such a serious accusation, ones life would be forever changed and there will always be doubts of your character.
Hi,
I feel it is Torsten, Clara's brother.
In one of the scenes, just before the snowfall, Torsten shows empathy towards Clara while they were preparing for Xmas.