MovieChat Forums > Noah (2014) Discussion > An Atheist's Perspective

An Atheist's Perspective


To be up front, Aronofsky is probably my favorite director. His movies always strike an intimate chord with me and never cease to leave me awe-struck, especially The Fountain. So I am slightly biased. I'm not saying this movie is perfect, I hated the way the villain was portrayed and the angels were a little cheesy, but I still think this movie is pretty incredible.

I should also say, I am an atheist, so the Noah story to me is nothing more than a children's story. I think the heart of this movie, which I attribute to Aronofsky, is intelligent and poignant. It sheds a unique light on God and the Christian faith, it brings to life an incredibly conflicted character.

I think this film received so much flak because A) It was marketed terribly, this is an Aronofsky film, not a CBN documentary, it should have been marketed appropriately. B) This film is not for the religious. God, Noah, and the Christian faith are made out to be psychopathic. It was as if Noah were afflicted with mental illness. I'm still trying to wrap my head around what Aronofsky was trying to say exactly with this story. Any thoughts on this?

And I don't think anyone can deny there were truly some beautiful sequences, that Creation montage still leaves me with my mouth open.

I just feel this film is a truly underrated work of art from a respected filmmaker. I'm interested in hearing other thoughts from people who can see this as a work of art and not a Biblical docudrama

reply

I too am an atheist and, though I'm not the Aronofsky fan you are, I thought this a well-made interesting film with a well fleshed-out script, excellent performances, and much visual poetry. But I think you err when you call this a look at Christianity. I can't agree. Its story is part of a long and ancient mythic tradition which doesn't belong solely to any one religion, but is a complex seeded both by religious and non-religious sources. I do agree it portrays its central (though unseen) deity figure as psychopathic, which pretty well describes the deities of most religions, the Abrahamic ones first and foremost. But I don't see how it could be denied those religious portray it as such.

As for the character of Noah, he's multi-layered and believable, nothing like the flat stick figure of his Christian incarnation. I don't think of his dilemma as "mental illness, though. He's someone placed under inconceivable stress by a horrifying task. He watches his world destroy while saddled with the guilt of being one of the few to survive it. This experience would leave any sane man deeply torn, conflicted, and ravaged by doubts. If you think about it, his obsession with killing his own children can't be much different from the tale's deity.

The difference is, Noah at last spares his.


Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

Mythic?
Nearly every race of peoples on the planet have a flood story told over time.

A myth is Bigfoot or the Abominable Snowman or Santa Claus. People believe with no evidence, but for the flood there is the Bible and the physical evidence of the billions of dead animals preserved all over the planet.

Worov, do you have any idea what it takes to preserve so many animal bodies like that?

Just lay a dead creature on the dirt and watch.
One year later there will be no evidence... yet they are finding preserved bone marrow, frozen Mammoths found with food in their mouths, mothers giving birth and fish eating other fish. All taken in an instant and preserved.
ALL OVER THE PLANET AND all were taken in a moment!

It was world wide and no myth.
It is only your denial which remains as vaporous as a myth.

reply

Completely and utterly wrong. It's nothing more than a myth. There isn't enough water on Earth to cover all the land. Sorry to burst your bubble...

We're from the planet Duplon. We are here to destroy you.

reply

.The bible is not evidence
.The Ice Ages caused these animals to be frozen in time, eating etc.

reply

For goodness sake, stop displaying your ignorance!
The preservation of fossils has zilch to do with a mythical flood.
It's one thing to deny all logic in believing a story which the world's greatest biblical scholars have denounced but to lack any knowledge of the scientific evidence involved in identifying ancient fossils makes you look pretty ordinary.

reply

It was as if Noah were afflicted with mental illness.


Those strange visions gave him a glimpse of a disaster yet to happen in future, well that's more believable than sand patterns on floor which leads to a secret facility. (Interstellar)


Everybody good? Plenty of slaves for my robot colony? ~ TARS

reply

This is a cryptic thought. Expand on it, if you would. Seriously. I'm honestly not sure what you mean, and would like to understand.


Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

A person having vague dreams about the future is more realistic than a spaceman who enters the five dimensional space (Blackhole) and sends coordinates to a secret facility in morse code by time travel. 🌌
Time travel itself is speculative and all I get is "it's because gravity" as an explanation from Nolanites.  Do pray tell me what dimension he's living in.


Everybody good? Plenty of slaves for my robot colony? ~ TARS

reply

To me it's kinda apples and oranges. Both Noah and Interstellar have their virtues and flaws. Myself, I wouldn't have picked out the film's overall premise as you have, since it's a standard meme of science fiction which I thought worked pretty well in terms of the overall plot line. For my money, the film's biggest flaw was the water planet. Not one, but two space craft land on it without having first checked to see if it was practicable. All that would have required was equipment which was in use by the time of WWII. C'mon, folks. Seriously?

But I certainly agree the movie's fans...Nolanites, as you call them...have gone hysterically overboard in their praise/defense of the film.


Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

the film's biggest flaw was the water planet.


Yeah, there's no land in sight and the terrain seems flat and shallow. Strange innit ?
I wonder how the huge wave happen to appear all of a sudden in a shallow ocean ?

but two space craft land on it without having first checked to see if it was practicable.



Didn't they establish contact with that planet like years ago on earth ? And the aircraft seemed to have crashed just hours before Cooper landed.

OURS IS THE FURY

reply

Didn't they establish contact with that planet like years ago on earth ?

The only data they could have gleaned from that distance would have been spectrographic, which wouldn't have reveal the waves, but only the world's chemical make-up, its heat, etc. I don't believe (I could be wrong, and just missed it) they sent actual probes to the planet. If they had, they'd have known about the waves.

And the aircraft seemed to have crashed just hours before Cooper landed.

If they'd scanned the planet from orbit with even the most rudimentary equipment, like radar, they'd have detected the waves and would have known it was useless to land. The fact they didn't scan it seems to me a huge plot hole.


Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

The only data they could have gleaned from that distance would have been spectrographic, which wouldn't have reveal the waves, but only the world's chemical make-up, its heat, etc. I don't believe (I could be wrong, and just missed it) they sent actual probes to the planet. If they had, they'd have known about the waves.


Chemical ? There wasn't any land in sight and I don't believe if there was any magnetic field interference. For me that entire planet looked like a kid's pool except for the giant waves of course.




If they'd scanned the planet from orbit with even the most rudimentary equipment, like radar, they'd have detected the waves and would have known it was useless to land.



They didn't use Sonar too I guess the water was too shallow for it ? 

I agree with that scanning thingy.....Nostromo, an old timer spaceship scanned the terrain before they landed.


░░░░░░██████]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▃
▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂
█████████████████████|
◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤

reply

except for the giant waves of course

In situations like that, you don't just "look." You employ scanning techniques to determine the topography. Given how quickly they came, one on top of the other, those waves would have been detected by even the most primitive equipment.

Nostromo, an old timer spaceship scanned the terrain before they landed.

Exactly. It's just an Interstellar plot hole.


Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

those waves would have been detected by even the most primitive equipment.



Not just that, how the hell could waves get so high in a shallow water planet ? There weren't any ocean currents either, its like watching a wave pool at an amusement park


Exactly. It's just an Interstellar plot hole.



Plothole in Nolan's films = True facts to Nolanites








░░░░░░︻╦╤─
░░░░░░██████]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▃
▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂
█████████████████████|
◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤

reply

how the hell could waves get so high in a shallow water planet ?

Good point. The film never addresses it. That would make a good lampoon skit, though...they've actually landed in the water attraction of the mile-high aliens which inhabit the planet.

"Oh, dang, Zbsflith! We're gonna have to disinfect again."
"Why is that, Ndmigljb?"
"We've got more of those funny-looking bugs from Earth in the pool!"


Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

Tell me about it, I got reported by those Nolanite half-wits just for pointing out its faults. In 2001: ASO, poor Dave Bowman was shot up the evolutionary ladder against his will but a certain turn of events led Dave to cosmic mysteries. When hyper intelligent beings started to intervene directly in Cooper’s life and time, it feels less like cosmic strangeness than it does convenient sentimentality. All I could think when this plot point. How nice of those omnipotent 5th-dimensional entities to have shown keen interest in Earthlings considering we didn’t get their whole point of saving humanity or anything. Not just that, if it takes a rocket to launch into space, how is it that Cooper took off the water planet with his Ranger when gravity in that planet supposedly was 1.5 times stronger than that of Earth's ?
I know its imaginative and all but if you look deeper, you'll find hundreds of unsolved plotholes in this movie.




░░░░░░︻╦╤─
░░░░░░██████]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▃
▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂
█████████████████████|
◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤

reply

This film was absolutely hilarious. The CGI was appalling, the acting by everyone besides Watson and Connelly was god-awful, the writing was generic and repetitive, the character of the creator' made no sense, Noah is an absolute psychopath who boasts about how much better than everyone else he is. The rock monsters, convenient magic powers, the way the woman gets caught in the bear trap, the fight scenes and some of the dialogue "BUT YOU'RE BARREN! YOU CANNOT CONCEIVE" is just brilliantly funny.

I am baffled by this film, it looks as cheap as an early 2000's discovery channel program.The direction and editing is conventional (except for a few neat time lapse shots) and there is so many unintentionally comical scenes I am stunned it got such a good RT rating.

reply




Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

Before you start chastising, ask yourself whether you could've done it better than that.
Nincompoop!



▌│█║▌║▌║ oυяs ιs тнε ғυяү ║▌║▌║█│▌

reply

ask yourself whether you could've done it better than that.

I'm not omniscient, omnipotent, and perfect. Erm...do you see the disconnect there?




Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

[deleted]

Er...change your thread display mode to 'nested' so you'd know who's replying to whom..

What Is Dead May Never Die

reply

It's probably better to think of the waves less as waves and more as the tide. Just like the level of water on earth is affected by the gravity of the moon (hence, the tide), the level of gravity on the water planet in Interstellar is affected by the immense gravity of the black hole the planet is orbiting.

The gravity of the black hole is capturing almost all of the water on the planet into one giant wave (or tide) that would span the entire planet north/south. This is why the water is so shallow when the wave is somewhere else in it's rotation around the planet. It's also this giant moving wave that has lead to the pretty much perfect "flat" surface of the planet. Any geographic features have long since been eroded away and the surface of the planet is now an almost perfect sphere (or so we can assume).

reply

"The gravity of the black hole is capturing almost all of the water on the planet into one giant wave (or tide) that would span the entire planet north/south."

Come on...black hole's gravity?? This can't be the why. It's impossible to generate huge wave in shallow water.  There has to be a large tidal wave coming from afar, flowing in from a deep sea instead they show a giant flood that came out of nowhere.


тrυe coυrage ιѕ noт aвoυт ĸnowιng wнen тo тaĸe a lιғe, вυт wнen тo ѕpare one.

reply

Here on Earth the difference between low tide and high tide in the Bay of Fundy is, on average, 47 feet. That means that during low tide there will be water that's 3 feet deep that during high tide would be 50 feet deep. That's all just from the gravity of the moon, a black hole has nearly incomparably greater gravity and therefore much greater ability to affect the surface water on this fictional planet.

reply

Since the gravitational pull of the black hole is so strong that almost all the water in the planet is pulled up, so I take it the land beneath is flat and these waves can continue to happen for hours and all around the planet? (or decades in earth's timeline)


тrυe coυrage ιѕ noт aвoυт ĸnowιng wнen тo тaĸe a lιғe, вυт wнen тo ѕpare one.

reply

Gravity must be balanced so that Moon doesn't fall on Earth and that planet doesn't fall on the black hole. I doubt this stability can be possible on a gravity capable of moving the water of the whole planet into a think wave. If anything, the water would be dragged away from the planet.

Also, Moon runs around Earth. IDK how much time it takes for a full movement. For those waves to move, it would be from the planet's spin.

Then I must ask, how can 2 waves come separated from a few hours? The planet can't spin that fast.

reply

Why would you assume the planet can't be spinning that quickly? Our planet takes roughly 24 hours to complete on revolution. Some planets take more, some take less. Jupiter for instance takes 10 hours

reply

The Moon is tidally locked with the Earth. The Moon does rotate, but it rotates so slowly that only one side ever faces the Earth. The Earth's gravity is what slowed down the Moon's rotation. In the mean time, the Earth is slowly becomming tidally locked with the Moon; one day the Earth and the Moon will both only present one 'face' to each other. The point being that the Wave Planet would become tidally locked to the black hole, and it would happen relatively quickly because the planet is close enough that the black hole is supposedly causing two mile high waves and a drastic time displacement. The bottom line is that there is just no way that those waves would occur like that. It looks great in the movie - there's no doubt about that - but it is completely and utterly ridiculous from a scientific perspective.

We're from the planet Duplon. We are here to destroy you.

reply

I think what is interesting is that many people who are praising the story of Interstellar as 'pure 100% perfect science' can accept the 'morse code through the tesseract' as perfectly justifiable science.

I mean it's ok to accept Interstellar as an excellent science fiction yarn, but I wish they would leave off on the 'perfect science' crap.

SpiltPersonality

reply

I wish they would leave off on the 'perfect science' crap.

Well, fans will be fans even in the face of hard evidence, and Nolan fans seem a particularly grebbly and stubborn variety. To them, the film had science advisors = its science is perfect. What can you do? Laugh and move on. (Love your avatar, BTW. "Gort! Declesko brotso!" Forgive the spelling.)


Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

im a huge Nolanite and i cant stick up for interstellar. 'earth is dying' 'how can you tell' 'dust'

then the whole black hole thing. its a comedy to me. it just needs a comedy score. some clown music or price is right or heavy metal or gangster rap. i was happy to see nolan look human and make a bad film and it still made a fortune. i dont think i could watch that movie ever again. oh and no air traffic control in gotham/batman? really? i truly think Nolans greatest ability is knowing how dumb the audience is. or to put it nicer, how willing and far viewers will suspend reality and belief while watching a movie. IT NEEDS A FEW MORE TWISTS!!!

reply

A person having vague dreams about the future is more realistic than a spaceman who....

Except when one pretends actual authenticity.

And this pretense is often a mask for poor storytelling...

“Your head is on the block and you worry about your whiskers?”

reply

THAT'S THE POWER OF LOVE!

reply

It's needs to take some vitamins...it's looking a bit peaked. 


Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

Nice!

reply

Mental illness was exactly what we thought. We're not religious in our house. We are gobsmacked that ANY person would think these stories are literally true. But this film? Just a dark, confusing mess with Noah being a big JERK. Overall, we were glad we didn't pay for this film.




You know what they say... no one with missing teeth wears an Armani suit.

reply

Why do you say it sheds a unique light on the Christian faith, and why do you say the Christian faith is made out to be psychopathic? Christianity wouldn't come into being for quite some time and so this movie sheds no more light on Christianity than it does Islam which, like Christianity, is a child religion of Judaism. The story of Noah, like all the Old Testament myths, comes from the Torah, not the Bible or the Koran, so if anything you should be saying it shines a unique light on Judaism and makes the Jewish faith look psychopathic (which it doesn't).

What was Aronofsky trying to say in this film? I don't think much of anything. He simply was trying to tell the Genesis flood narrative in an entertaining and, while not exactly believable, a more believable way than the source material. After all, we all know you can't expect lambs to survive laying down with lions and that a handful of ancient people alone could never build an ark of that magnitude.

reply

Burn in HELL devil worshipper!!!!!

reply

Feel the Christian love.




Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

There is one God and one belief. Every other especially doubters and islam are going to burn for eternity and the souls will be dammed forever plain and simple!

reply

There is one God and one belief.

Unsubstantiated claims are both meaningless and unworthy of either consideration or respect.

going to burn for eternity and the souls will be dammed forever

What an inept bungler is this deity you've fantasized; wasteful, egocentric, and filled with spite. Sounds just like a petulant Oriental potentate...which is exactly what this imaginary entity of yours was modeled on. You aren't even vaguely convincing, never mind in the least bit frightening. Next you'll be threatening with the Big Bad Wolf.

It says a great deal about your own malicious heart that you believe these vile things.


Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

I don't want to offend you, or make you upset, but I am praying for you that somehow, someway you find God. Then he sends you straight to Hell.

reply

I am praying for you that somehow, someway you find God.

One can't find something that doesn't exist.

Then he sends you straight to Hell.



That, or the Big Bad Wolf. With such vile hatred spewing from its every pore, can it be any wonder that people of good heart reject the delusional sociopathic poison that is Christianity?




Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

[deleted]

I hope Satan makes you suck his wiener when you get there!

reply

I hope Satan makes you suck his wiener

So do I! He's sure to be HOT!!! 


Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

Dude it's not cristianity that's the problem. Real cristians talk about loving and helping each other, in a fraternal society.

The problem is ICAR, the roman church. They deturped the original message, changed most everything, demanded money so people could go to a heaven - which comes from Greece's Olimpo, and not from judaism or cristianism - and killed everybody that didn't accept what they said - this included original cristians, gnostics, and followers of religions they then called pagans.

Roman church with its popes just made a big lie to hide the original message and remain holding the power.

reply

Every other especially doubters and islam are going to burn for eternity and the souls will be dammed forever plain and simple!


I agree. Allah itself is a demon tbh and its teachings are evil.


Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus

reply

Allah itself is a demon tbh and its teachings are evil.

The meds. Take 'em. We'll all thank you.




Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

Now I know why you hate Jesus. 


Its funny how you despise a modest man who promotes love while you never brought up those sycophantic people of Islam who inspire Terrorism and mass destruction.

Ouch. Truth hurts...




Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus

reply

what hurts is Jesus screwing you in the ass!!!

reply

what hurts is Jesus screwing you in the ass

Au contraire...by definition, that would have to be DIVINE!




Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

No cause hes got a big black one!

reply

Racist. 


Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

Nope just jealous. Also by calling me a racist makes you an even bigger racist. See my intent was not to simply comment back to you with the urban myth that black guys are very well endowed. You however have in the back of your mind my comment was racist, which in completely not true. Which means you think of racism every time someone mentions, joke or otherwise, a race other than white.

Way to go racist!

Your friend....

Zap Rowsdower

reply

my intent was not to simply comment back to you with the urban myth that black guys are very well endowed.

That comment alone is a clear admission that you and you alone are the one who injected racism into the proceedings. Nice work and many thanx!




Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

Wrong! I didn't say it, I was injecting what most firmly believe.

reply

Please... please stop embarrassing yourself. I'm feeling embarrassed for you and the feeling is really unpleasant.

reply

I didn't say it, I was injecting what most firmly believe.



Nice backpedal fail. You should be a spin doctor for the Republidumbs. They'd never win another election.


Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

Hate Jesus? Where on earth do you get that lunatic notion?

a modest man who promotes love

He claimed to be a deity. Hardly modest. As for promoting "love," what does that even mean? He promoted divided families.

you never brought up those sycophantic people of Islam who inspire Terrorism and mass destruction

Fanatics are fanatics whatever their religion, and I'm against fanaticism in any form, most especially when it promotes harm to people. It's just, there are few Muslims who visit this or any other IMDb board, so the subject doesn't come up nearly as much as Christian fanaticism does.

But nice try at changing the subject. 


Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

With such vile hatred spewing from its every pore,



petulant Oriental potentate





"Disappointment is inevitable. But to become discouraged, there's a choice I make. God would never discourage me. He would always point me to himself to trust him. Therefore, my discouragement is from Satan. As you go through the emotions that we have, hostility is not from God, bitterness, unforgiveness, all of these are attacks from Satan."

^Says the Pastor, Stanley.

lol 

Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus

reply

my discouragement is from Satan

Thus also from your deity. Cut it any way you like, if this entity created everything, then it would be responsible for everything, good and bad.


Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

No, that would be like blaming the scientist for a Robot gone rogue.

I'm not going to stop the wheel. I'm going to break the wheel.

reply

that would be like blaming the scientist for a Robot gone rogue

Sorry, that simile just doesn't work. A scientist doesn't make EVERYTHING. You have only two choices here, I'm afraid. Either you deity created everything and so is responsible for all evil, or it isn't responsible for evil, meaning something else created it.

In which case, you're a polytheist.


Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

Either you deity created everything and so is responsible for all evil,



"yet he also is wise and will bring disaster and does not retract his words but will arise against the house of evildoers and against the help of the workers of iniquity."


Capiche?


I'm not going to stop the wheel. I'm going to break the wheel.

reply

That quote by no means covers anything near like the sum total of what constitutes "evil" in this world. Your deity would be responsible for all the evildoers in the world. So it makes them do what they do then "smites" 'em for doing it.

This is the kind of deity that likes to pull the wings off flies.

Capiche?


Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

https://youtu.be/9XafPI4aL4U...or be condemned!


I'm not going to stop the wheel. I'm going to break the wheel.

reply

Incoherent.


Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

republicans are dumb and so are you! Go to the worms heathen....BTW none of this is anything I believe...I was bored..nice to whip out the thesaurus on every response though. bravo.

reply

I was bored

And boring.




Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

And you my *beep* are an ignorant wretch.

reply

an ignorant wretch



Ah, yes...another well-reasoned dispassionate analysis by yet another Internet nobody.


Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

imdb movie goer it was a quote from tombstone.

reply

it was a quote from tombstone

Never seen it, never care to. Don't like Westerns.


Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

The Beep was supposed to be say "Nob Jockey"

reply

He claimed to be a deity. Hardly modest. As for promoting "love," what does that even mean? He promoted divided families.


Cmon he didn't claim that. It was Constantino, the marketman, founder of ICAR, the roman church, that claimed it.

Constantino did that because all other religions of the time had great and powerful gods, as Zeus, Mythra, etc. He needed Jesus to be a god as those so he'd not seem weaker.

reply

Feel the whrath of their god!!

reply

I couldn't agree more on what the writer of this topic wrote.
Amen to all of that. PS Atheist also here.

reply

PS Atheist also here

Didn't you hear? Nones are now 22.8% of the US population, trailing (but closing fast) only evangelical protestants at 25.4%...

“Your head is on the block and you worry about your whiskers?”

reply

[deleted]

That seems a very fair and level-headed assessment.




Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

it actually was. and i am truly surprised you recognized it seeing as i always thought you considered yourself to be level headed - which you clearly are not.
the day you post anything close to being considered as sane as this is the day putin stops being crazy russian ass hole.

reply

[deleted]

its what we do. we've been here too long.

reply

its what we do. we've been here too long.

Nope, its what you do...and others of your ilk...though once in a while you stray from your chosen path and talk like an actual human being and not some cheap simulacrum.

This is just another false equivalence...like that of claiming atheism is a belief system akin to any religion...but spoiling a conversation with such nonsense does not make one equally eloquent to everyone else.





“Your head is on the block and you worry about your whiskers?”

reply

Nope, its what you do...and others of your ilk...

Ain't it the truth! The surest sign of a troll is a poster who responds to the posts of someone who has them on permanent and eternal IGNORE.




Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

ohh denial. 

feeble attempt to save face infront of people who haven't witnessed the months of bile you and
your alter-ego account have spewed over perfectly reasonable posters who simply disagree with you.

nice to see you haven't forgotten how to appear reasonable 

🌈

reply

I understand people have passionate views on the subject, but I don't understand why you can't have respect for another's views. We're all living in this world trying to get by. Why tear each other down?

It is precisely because some of us have respect for each person as a human being that we bemoan "views" and behavior that are illogical, unreasonable and very often quite dangerous to themselves and others.

Otherwise, why waste the time? One might as well argue with a brick wall....oh, wait...there are indeed a lot of brick walls hanging around here!

Seriously, it is sometimes hard to not get frustrated when the respect and incumbent openness that is necessary for any beneficial exchange of ideas and views is not met in kind...when those that only wish to preach just pretend to listen...in those cases, too often encountered, a conversation with a brick wall would be much more fruitful, lacking this poisonous mortar of deceit.

Is it ironic...or just inevitable...that this is so often the domain of the religiously bent, those that have contorted their true natures beyond all recognition?



“Your head is on the block and you worry about your whiskers?”

reply

[deleted]

You and aaahmemories are the same person, aren't you?



you're not remotely interested in anything other than shutting people down

Is your position really that weak? I can't speak for hafeez (no, we're not the same person...try reading our posts rather than obsessing on the completely irrelevant topic of formatting...you'll immediately realize we're two entirely and quite different thinkers who happen to share some similar ideas), but I state my position in the clearest, strongest way possible, just as any poster should. If this "shuts people down," it's because they have no effective case and/or are too shallow to formulate effective responses.


Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

I can't speak for hafeez (no, we're not the same person
its so cute when you deny it 
yes it is next level crazy that you have conversations with yourself, but you are next level crazy - so own it.

reply

P.S. The clearest proof your assumption is false about the supposed identity of me with another poster is that it's endorsed by one of the board's chronic trolls. This is just another poisoning the well technique. It's childish and beneath you. I should think you were better than that.


Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply

mate. we've been here for more than a year, and in that time you have blown yourself up on more than a couple of occasions responding to things with the wrong account.
i dont troll, i just troll you - because you troll everyone else 

we actually got along when you first came to the board, back when it was filled to the brim with evangelical types condemning all non-believers to hell etc. then the dust settled and it turned out you are just as close minded and hate filled as the people you so heartily derided on a daily basis.
so you believe in different values to fundamental christians, but really you are 2 sides of the same close minded coin. unfortunately you are too old, too rigid of mind and way to deep in your own crazy bullsh!t to ever be able to see that.

as usual you will pretend i am on ignore then respond with hafeez so you can add your 2 cents to that comment and continue this petty charade you have set up for yourself.



reply

thank you! It's so underrated! And I am a firm christian believer.

reply

I consider Noah to be essentially the companion piece to The Fountain. Even production-wise, you will see many similarities. The riot scenes with the mob coming to take over the Ark are stylistically the same as the Mayan attack in the beginning of Fountain. The Angel's transfiguration before the flood is essentially a different take on Tom's "sacrifice" during the climactic supernova scene. There are many other similar instances in terms of appearance. But thematically there is also a strong connection.

The two movies are concerned with the two trees in the garden of Eden. Whereas Fountain dealt with the tree of life, Noah deals with the tree of knowledge. In the Fountain, the protagonist seeks eternal life and through his adventures arrives at accepting his death and sacrifice as part of the life cycle, relinquishing his fear of death and hunger for eternity. In Noah, the situation is the complete opposite. Noah is burdened by the knowledge of impending doom and his survival guilt and believes he and his family (and the human race in general) are not worthy of going on. He longs for death, yet is bound by the knowledge of his duty, so his journey here is the complete opposite of Fountain, until he comes to accept his (and humanity's) survival. See also the similar climactic scene in Pi with the drill. The protagonist there chooses not to know. This is also the meaning of the scene where Noah gets drunk, forsaking knowledge. This is why this scene is followed by his reconciliation with his family and Noah accepting his place in the new world.


... it's gonna get a hell of a lot worse before it gets any better.

reply

Very interesting interpretation which provides a great deal of food for thought. Nicely done!




Religion is like a rocking chair -- a lot of work to get nowhere.

reply