What if the story was exactly the same but Maggie was a boy named Michael? What would you label it then?
How is that even possible though? A real boy would never do laughably asinine things like Maggie does in this film, like cut off his own fingers to be melodramatic, or go on a "zombie date night." This film's ludicrous plot points like those are linked to the girl protagonist and to female viewers who find entertainment in such nonsense.
With a girl, those scenes are
already unintentionally hilarious! With a boy instead, those scenes would be unintentionally hilarious x 1000 fold more.
I'd label it as a chick flick if it follows the conventions of the chick flick genre. In the alternative version you are proposing, it would still follow the conventions of the chick flick genre so yes, it would still be a chick flick.
reply
share