All through the film Naomi Watts explains why she is comfortable childless and it was refreshing to hear after all the Judd Apatow (you must have kids to be happy) story lines. And then... this pointless u-turn "One year later" crap at the end. Almost ruined this film for me. Unnecessary. While we're young ... we could have been good friends and you let me down like all the others!!!!
Loved the majority and made me really glad not to be a 20 something at the moment. Hipsters, instagram etc. Urrgghhh
they were having second thoughts by the end, when the initially cute kid starts crying out loud.
Lol. It seemed that they were having second thoughts when the camera rested on the kid playing with the cell phone and they looked at each other as if to say, 'what are we getting ourselves into?'
I didn't really get the feeling that Cornelia was crazy about children from the way she seemed so uncomfortable with holding her friend's baby at the beginning. She was obviously uncomfortable at the mom and tots music class as well--and it didn't seem like a painful discomfort either, which it would have been if she was really lamenting not having kids. It seemed more like she couldn't imagine herself actually enjoying a class like that.
That's why the ending came out of left field--Josh and Cornelia seemed to be quite uncomfortable with having kids throughout the film and then they decide to adopt. Of course people can change their minds, but this ending seemed to be tacked on. And on a realistic note, how could they afford an adoption? Josh wasn't making much money and Cornelia worked for her father presumably not making that much either. Plus, they both seemed to always be working--who would actually be raising the child?
and i agree that cornelia wasn't really prepared to be a mother (but not because f bing obviously uncomfortable in that ridiculous class - who wouldn't be?!).
And on a realistic note, how could they afford an adoption? Josh wasn't making much money and Cornelia worked for her father presumably not making that much either.
maybe her father was helping, i don't know.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ books, records, films - these things matter.
reply share
He is a formal director, so it's no so much about this and that.
I absolutely love the cinematicality of the ending, since the movie starts out with a shot of the two and a child you are supposed to think is theirs. It's not. So, the one-year-later-cut at the end leaves us thinking, hey, surely that's not their child, which it isn't. But, after all they are on their way to adoption.
The big question why they REALLY did not have a child, is unanswered and left to our own imagination.
"You couldn't be much further from the truth" - several
Do they really want a child, or are they merely giving in to social expectation? It's no coincidence that the child they're evidently adopting is black, fulfilling a cliched white bourgeois notion seemingly born less from their desire than from some dubiously imposed social cause. Then there's the final, quite disturbing shot of the baby on the iPhone and their bemused, petrified reaction, which is worlds away from a "happy" or hopeful ending. It seems awfully clear that Baumbach is critical of their decision at best - I don't know how anyone could watch this film or any of his films and take what you see at face value. Everything is suffused with irony and ambivalence, and this ending is no different.