MovieChat Forums > Arbitrage (2012) Discussion > The detective is the real villain!

The detective is the real villain!


The detective faked evidence and was using that faked evidence to put an innocent black man away for 10 years, on the off-chance, that he might be able to catch Richard Gere. Where is this cop's sense of justice? His actions are about as justified as shooting an innocent man in the head, in order to catch a shoplifter. If Richard Gere's "crime" was bad, this cop's crime of faking the evidence is certainly much worse (from both an ethical and a legal perspective).

After I saw that, I stopped caring what Richard Gere had done. Everything Gere does in this film is for selfish purposes, but they're also rationalized (in Gere's mind) as actions he is doing for others. The cop is ready to willfully hurt others (both poor and rich) out of envy and greed for Gere's billions. Richard Gere's character (and even his greed) comes off as absolutely angelic in comparison.

For instance, by not turning himself in after the accident, nothing bad happens (except those things caused by the crooked cop). The girl is already dead, and the important things he could do for her at that point, he does (i.e. he goes to her funeral and shows love and affection to her family).

However, had he turned himself in, not only would he have gone to prison, but his entire company would have gone bankrupt, and his investors and all of his employees would have lost their jobs. By not turning himself in, he avoided a whole lot of pain to a whole lot of innocent people.

Furthermore, the people who might feel cheated by Gere don't. The guy who buys the company hardly blinks an eye at the new audit ("just another shrewd move by 'The Oracle'"). His wife, apparently already knew about the affair and the cooked books, and in the end, we find out she just wants the money.

(By the way, knowing about an affair, and pretending that you don't know, for the sake of your relationship is still dishonesty, it's just dishonesty for a different reason.)

As far as financials, Gere made a risky bet and then fraudulently covered it up, but it wasn't outright theft or even embezzlement. Furthermore, in the end, he saved his company and his investors, which is ultimately, what they were paying him to do.

Lastly, I understand why his daughter is disillusioned by her father's corruption, but I don't think she was thinking clearly when she asks "why didn't you involve me in this?" Had Gere involved her in the earlier stages of his decision to paper it up, she might have been held liable for the crime.

All in all, I found myself rooting for Gere, especially given all the evil perpetrated by the government in trying to bring him to "justice".

reply

He was just threatening Jimmy to rat out Gere, if he had they would have dropped any charges against him and would never have done the jail time. But faking evidence for a grand jury is serious illegal police work.

reply

Several fallacies...

One is that Jimmy is "innocent". While he may be a sympathetic character, technically he is guilty of being an accessory and perjury. And he's already a convicted gun felon. That doesn't justify framing him, but your basic premise of framing a innocent guy is fully false.

Secondly, Robert Miller's financial transactions in the copper mine were highly illegal, as were his subsequent transactions to cover it up. You're 100% wrong when you say it was just a bad business deal. No, it was straight up fraud. Manipulating the books to sell the company was just to paper over the loss temporarily.

You think that his cover up saved jobs and helped the innocent. Again, wrong. The losses are real. Whether those losses come at the cost of his old employees now, or the employees of the new organization, or the widows who invested, nothing Robert Miller did fixes that. In fact the delay and coverup increases the future damage. And just like a counterfeit bill that takes awhile to be discovered, it just means the discovery and eventual loss is borne by someone further from the centre of the scheme. Furthermore, numerous of his colleagues were complicit in the crime, so protecting their jobs is hardly noble.



reply

The losses are all Miller's he made 412 million + interest less from the sale for having to pay back his friend

reply