Why are Consrvatives such bad artists?

The Left makes dogshit propaganda full of crude messaging, trannies and gay sex.

Conservatives make The Sistine Chapel.

They don't challenge their audience to make them think. The main characters in these films are always justified in who they are and what they do. Characters who dissent are depicted as villainous and godless secularists. They preach to the choir and reaffirm what the audience already believe.

Many film makers (studio heads, producers, directors, writers, actors) during the 1920s through 1960s were conservative, and many, many great movies were made during that period. The problem isn't that conservatives can't make good movies, it's that for the past few decades their access to film making has been significantly restricted, since Hollywood went completely leftist. Conservatives just don't get many chances to make mainstream movies. For the past forty years or more, most movies have been made by leftists, and a lot of them have been bad.

I think you have some selection bias here.

People who are more liberal/left are more likely to want to go into the arts - especially arts like film, television, music, fine art, etc. So, the majority of people making movies are liberal. But that doesn't mean liberals make better movies. Clint Eastwood is an amazing filmmaker, for instance. Jimmy Stewart was a great actor. Kelsey Grammar, etc., etc. So, we can see that conservatives are capable of great art.

Furthermore, if you dive into other areas that are not "the arts" but are artistic, you can see that conservatives have no problems. Carpentry, for instance, has plenty of conservative people and you can find exquisitely carved furniture and appointments filled with creativity and aesthetic beauty.

The next layer of bias is what you're watching as "conservative art". Pureflix doesn't make art. They make propaganda films. It's like asking why the Coca-Cola Company's marketing department doesn't make great art. They are trying to trick your subconscious mind into getting thirsty when it sees a red-and-white can. There are funny or weirdly touching commercials, but by-and-large, it's the wrong industry. That's why Mel Gibson makes great movies but Pureflix doesn't: Gibson is trying to make art.

Finally, the left doesn't make good propaganda, either. When they try and shove soapbox messaging and strawman arguments into films, audiences hate that, too.

Only when an artist focuses on making the art great does it work - regardless of the core. V for Vendetta (the comic) was made by an anarchist, but doesn't read like a commercial for anarchy. It's complex, nuanced, and allows the art and story to take the centre.

And then it's just down to the fact I started with: more liberals want to make art. That is a bit of a brain chemistry thing. A brain that is more chaotic and curious is going to be drawn to liberal ideas and is going to enjoy/be great at making art.

Low IQs

most conservatives still hate minorities and women, and get mad when they see minorities or women in movies. you think they'd be able to make art? that takes complex thinking skills.