MovieChat Forums > The Age of Adaline (2015) Discussion > Things that would have made this movie b...

Things that would have made this movie better?


I felt like it was too empty.

I wanted to see MORE struggle with her not aging. I felt like she should have had at least two kids and one of them should have died.

Also, her past relationships should have been explored more and gone into greater detail.

Plus, the narration of the movie was interesting, but I felt like the narrator's voice was too authoritative and should have been more casual yet professional instead of textbook. Also, she never changed personality wise. If you're the same age for so many years, I doubt you would stay the exact same. She seemed classy which was fine, but she had no humor and was almost TOO classy, if that makes sense?

Thoughts?

reply

I liked the movie, but I too felt it could have been much better. Maybe more enjoyable if she didn't confine herself in this same too serious, too classy personality. I'm not saying I didn't like it, she's lovely, but in every situation it seems like she gave up on life and can't enjoy anything anymore. I understand her situation, but someone has to look at the full half of the glass every now and then.

Pray for the best. Prepare for the worst.

reply

I liked it and I liked the female lead,who I have somehow not seen in much,but does anybody think Gwynnie Paltrow would have been great in the part?

She does look like a beauty from the golden age of Hollywood I think,something she works on I think.

reply

paltrow would have been too old, she is 15 years older than blake...
P.s if you liked blake lively, be sure to watch savages, it is a very good movie in which blake is not only the lead cast but she is also the narrator...

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1615065/?ref_=nv_sr_1

you can also try gossip girl but it's girly and i don't think you will like it...

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0397442/?ref_=nv_sr_1

reply

Very much agree with you OP.

The movie was too rushed, with the wrong type of progression at times (Starting in the present day, then going back, but not really going back etc), a cheesy and forced narration (His tone and him/the screenwriter spelling things out for us), and a halfway effective performance from Michiel as Ellis.

What saved the movie for me in many ways was the performance from Ellen Burstyn, Blake as the lead, the style of the movie, and most especially Harrison Ford giving an exceptional performance!

The movie still only registers as a 2 1/2 star movie, as the flaws are just too big, but the meeting the parent's sequence was perfect. Never thought Ford would be able to bring a tear to my eye, but he did, and the magic was back with him!

reply

The narration was mainly to explain the physiological changes, which the characters had no way of understanding. Avoiding the narration would have been impossible since without it the movie had no way of telling the viewers what was going on.

reply

I guess I'm in the minority, but I enjoyed the subtlety in the storytelling. I didn't want to see a lot of melodrama. I wouldn't have mind a longer movie though.

reply

I'm with you. I really enjoyed watching it all unfold like a fable. I don't need all of that over-exaggerated drama.

Sure it wasn't perfect - the science wasn't believable, but it no less believable than say a fairy godmother turning a pumpkin into a carriage or a boy who gets bitten by a spider and turns into spiderman, or people that jump out of buildings and into cars that are moving at 100 mph. I think all fantasy movies have elements that just need to be accepted to enjoy them.

I liked the performances of the actors, Blake as Adaline seemed suitably troubled, looking for something more in her life but having deep reservations at the same time. Michiel as Ellis was excellent bringing some nervousness that seemed fitting when pursuing someone you really want to meet and humor that enabled Adaline to see how her life could be happier. Ellen as Flemming was wonderful - her scene in the hospital when she found out that Ellis knew was the one that got to me. The twist with Harrison Ford's role of William was actually touching. Once he confirmed what he suspected, all he cared about was his son's happiness. That was a great moment - they didn't get into melodrama territory, which was the right move.

I love the movie the way it is but if I had to change a few things I would lessen the narration (but not take it out completely) as the audience could figure much of it out from the scenes. And I would add an extra scene or two between Adaline and Ellis dating over a longer timespan.

reply

I wouldn't have minded a miniseries or better yet a full-blown series that took 10-20 hours to tell the same story. The ending, though happy, really needed more setup as to how Adaline reached that point emotionally, and more time actually fleshing out the aftermath to be truly satisfying to me.

A better idea of how she lived the past 80 years would've helped me swallow why she made her decision to stop running at that point in time (a few hours into driving away!). And I have this deep craving to see the whole scene where Ellis heard Adaline's revelations of her true age and the relationship she had with his father. It felt like a major omission not to have more scenes with Ellis's family after Adaline spilled the beans, seeing his parents and sister granting proper weight to Adaline's past, and figuring out her new place in their family. The comet returning "half a century late but just as beautiful as predicted" was cute shorthand, but not as good as seeing the whole aftermath.

reply

While I did enjoy the movie, I agree with you. I would have really like to see a few things fleshed out a bit more, like Adaline telling Ellis her life story or more scenes with Ellis family.

This is my signature.

reply

I would have like it to have been Ellis who had the accident and not Adaline, whch would have been both an unexpected twist and something that would have given him a greater understanding of her dilemma, i.e. her need to conceal the fact that she was not able to age and was thus a freak of nature, who would have not been left alone for one instant had this fact become public knowledge. I would also have like some explanation of why the FBI abducted her. Did the FBI have the power to abduct people without arresting them even when it was run by Hoover?

reply

If you notice, the FBI picked her up, during the Red Scare/McCarthy era. The agents told her it was because they had no history for her. (She had changed her name, etc) This was typical of the times, everyone one was afraid. She had no history, so that was suspicious Everyone was afraid of the Commies, and many people's lives were ruined, just from speculation.

reply

[deleted]

Spoilers ahead .......


The second accident was very predictable. I had expected it by the time half the movie was over. The movie makers wanted a Hollywood ending where everyone lives happily ever after. A better end would have been to let him accept the reality that he will grow old but she will not. Let them live a meaningful life with that understanding instead of a convenient accident that reverses the 'damage' perfectly and makes her start aging again. Also her getting a gray hair in just one year is unnecessary. Let the audience figure that out. IMO this was a waste of an interesting idea.

Moral of the story: if you are too different from everyone around you, you are in trouble, and looking younger than everyone around you is not a blessing.

reply

I resented having the need for a second accident too. On top of being contrived in its timing, it diminished the sacrifice Adaline was prepared to make, seeing her loved ones grow old and die while she remained the same.

It also felt way too neat. The accident that caused her condition gets a pass for setting up the story. The second one, no way. I can only believe in one once-in-a-lifetime accident, no matter how long the life! The narrator tried to set up a common cause between the two, with a lunar meteor impact 800 years ago somehow affecting Earth weather patterns and causing it to snow in that particular part of California for the first time in 78 years, but I was not inclined to let him get away with it.

So yeah, while the standard-romance playbook demanded her becoming "normal" again in a parallel bookend accident, I think it would've been a much more interesting story without that twist.

reply

I totally agree. I felt like a better ending would have been what you suggested. It would have been very bittersweet, but I still feel like it would have been better.

This is my signature.

reply

Exactly what i thought. The second accident was so uncalled for. I mean if she loved him she would watch him grow old and love him the same way whereas he would always love her as well regardless of whether she ages or not.
The grey hair was not worked nicely as well but i do believe that it was nice that they cleared that she would age. It was obvious but these sort of definitive things buts a stop to message board where people would have made up conspiracy theories lol

reply

I thought the movie was ok, not anywhere near great. The main saving grace was Harrison Ford's performance, he made the movie watchable to me. My problems with the movie were:

1. Unlike other Immortals portrayed in other movies, she was content watching the world without being part of it. Other immortals fought in wars, lived adventurous lives, and at least tried to live their long lives to the fullest they can until the tolls of long life started getting to them (she was only alive for 107 years, so there wasn't even the excuse of being affected by that). Adaline instead, hid from the world, and tried to be as unassuming as possible. She worked in unassuming careers, and by the end was attempting to hide away completely in a remote farm. The only chance she took of living was described as a moment of weakness.

2. The narration was so off-putting. I understand they wanted to make it fairy-tale like, but they should have stuck with that. Instead the narrator put in nonsensical scientific jargon like if he was the narrative voice of Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy only far less funny.

One other thing bothered me, is why G-Men were after her in the first place? The only thing that may have them interested is a report of the police about a girl who looked younger than she was (which was only 45 years old). However, there are many people in the world that are like that (I myself is often mistaken for someone in his 30s), so that wouldn't have raised an eyebrow, and wouldn't raise any red flags with the government. Heck, Hollywood is a stable of people appearing younger than they really are.

reply

Those are interesting perspectives. While I did have issues with the storytelling in the movie, I found different things to be problems!

1. Yeah, Adaline wasn't the "grab life by the horns and squeeze what you can get out of it for as long as you can, YOLO no ragrets" sort of person that stories are usually about. She was a composed, collected woman who loved books and language and history and when freed of personal bonds, that's what she chose to spend her life pursuing. She took pride in just being a good ordinary person and wanted nothing more than to be left alone to live life with her loved ones, and I loved her character for being exactly that. So while some people might dislike the movie for writing her this way, Adaline's version of immortal was what I loved best about it.

2. I think most people agree about the narration, me included. I can see why they wanted the fairy-tale tone, but the science technobabble just left me thinking, sorry, what?

I found the FBI suspicions perfectly believable. If I was a federal investigator who saw Communists and spies behind every corner in paranoid 1950s America, my initial reaction to coming across someone who lives like a fugitive and whose documentation says they're 46 but who looks like they're 25, is not oh, they're probably just well-preserved for their age. No, I would think they're probably an impostor who stole their identity papers for nefarious reasons! While Hollywood actresses these days do seem to defy the passage of time, it wasn't anywhere so extreme 50 or 60 years ago.

Anyway, what I found wrong with the movie was that it didn't provide enough of a view into Adaline's pivotal decision to stay at the end of the movie, and how people around her reacted and her reacting to their reactions, when the secret she spent so long hiding finally came out. Part of the reason we go see movies like this is the emotional spectacle and catharsis, and Age of Adaline didn't deliver enough of that.

reply

Just saw this movie tonight. Disappointed with the outcome, I expected more. I agree with almost all the issues previous people stated. The film did not need a narrator. It had to many gaps in Adaline's life. The character of Adaline was too disconnected with her life, only seeming upset when she lost her dog. Who raised her daughter? What did she do all those decades in between losing her accident and living in San Francisco? Who else did she encounter in her life? What happened to her parents, did she just let them think she was dead? The character was emotionless for most of her life. Even though she could not age physically, anybody after being on the planet as long as her and seeing the world change so much would at least be jaded or passionate about something. She wasn't. I think the story was told too fast and should have been longer.

Blake Lively is beautiful to look at but placed, expressionless and blasé as an actor. She lacks depth and plays the character too light. Harrison Ford does the best acting and even his scenes are short.

This film had the potential to be more . It could have been told like the Curious Case of Benjamin Button. Too bad.

reply

[deleted]

It's a very simple love story about an immortal woman whose immortality doesn't even matter to the plot. The whole new script would made it better.

reply