I wanted to see MORE struggle with her not aging. I felt like she should have had at least two kids and one of them should have died.
Also, her past relationships should have been explored more and gone into greater detail.
Plus, the narration of the movie was interesting, but I felt like the narrator's voice was too authoritative and should have been more casual yet professional instead of textbook. Also, she never changed personality wise. If you're the same age for so many years, I doubt you would stay the exact same. She seemed classy which was fine, but she had no humor and was almost TOO classy, if that makes sense?
Yeah, I felt like Adaline really needed more tragedy to happen to give her a proper excuse to break out of her habits of personal withdrawal. I mean, her dog dies, and that's perhaps the worst thing that happens to her onscreen, and it must have happened to her several times already. It feels like a 107-year-old woman on the run for 80 years should have something far more crushing to convince her to stop running and do things differently. She did get a couple good crying scenes, one of them her reunion with William, but good as the acting was, it just didn't get the proper emotional mileage that, say, a child's death would have had. The scene where she talks with her daughter about moving to Arizona alluded to her fear that she wouldn't be able to be there if/when Flemming dies, but it ended up being an empty threat.
If I had the writing ability, I would have rewritten the scene with William telling her the jig was up, or even that whole weekend, so Adaline was more obviously afflicted with regrets after seeing what sort of life he built with his wife over the last 40 years. It wasn't enough just for William to express disbelief at her not having a life. Adaline had to talk about it too and make us feel it, how she deeply wants what he was able to have, but she couldn't see how she could with her lack of aging. And that the regrets have just kept following her and building up over the years. It seemed that we never heard it in her words, only the narrator's, and it would have been much more effective coming from Adaline. Just another reason to get rid of the stupid narration. And then depict her throughout the movie as a woman who, even obscured behind her old-fashioned reserve, comes closer and closer to an emotional breakthrough until it happens.
I think if the above changes were made, giving Adaline more of an emotional journey, we wouldn't be talking about her seeming too classy to be a real human with a heart that bleeds.
It wasn't just her dog dying though, it was also facing the fact that her only daughter was getting old and might be dying soon. Clearly her daughter's death was something on her mind given her comments on her birthday when they met. Her daughter telling her to go for it while nearing the end I think had even more of an effect on her than her dog dying.
Hm, perhaps. Her worries didn't come through as strongly for me as I thought it could have. But maybe I'm just bad at fitting together everything that the movie showed. Watching the movie again, I noticed she kept old pictures of her first husband around her apartment. If the movie had shown more of her reaction to the death of her first husband, it might've benefited.
It wasn't enough just for William to express disbelief at her not having a life. Adaline had to talk about it too and make us feel it, how she deeply wants what he was able to have, but she couldn't see how she could with her lack of aging. And that the regrets have just kept following her and building up over the years. It seemed that we never heard it in her words, only the narrator's, and it would have been much more effective coming from Adaline.
I agree. My wife noted that she never connected with Adaline because she seemed invulnerable--really untouched by anything that had happened. I don't think that was in the script. I think that was the acting/directing. But then, maybe Blake Lively never connected with Adaline, either. Also, the real conflict--the real meat of the story--was between William and Adaline. End of Act 1 should have put everyone at the parents' house. So much good stuff there, I wouldn't know where to stop. Hell, it could have been a straight Broadway play, another Prelude to a Kiss. And also, once again Harrison Ford plays Professor Jones.
The whole point was that by running every 10 years, she's keeping everyone at arm's length. She's chosen to not let things affect her. And that was the problem. The daughter realized that after she dies, her mother will have no real human connections so she pushes her to stop running and settle down.
I was very sympathetic with Adaline. At first she wanted to connect with people, but found she had to keep her distance. That was heart breaking and I felt for her because of what she must have been going through all those years. She was suffering so much on the inside but had to put up barriers and keep the secret from everyone but her daughter.
It would have made it more heartbreaking, but after the second accident she should have rapidly aged and turned to dust. She should have died decades ago. Think "Love live Walter Jameson" on the Twilight Zone. Once the miracle was reversed, she should have rapidly aged and died. Now she gets another 40 or 50 years. She only found one gray hair. That's not realistic at all, but this is a fairy tale after all.
Actors are mere products of a good writer's imagination
That would definitely break the reality of the movie. The whole time the movie was shooting for a realistic universe-as-we-know-it feel, which was why it used fake scientific talk to explain how it was just some rare chance alignment of occurrences that made her stop aging, rather than having magic curses by elves or Faustian bargains or alien technology. Making her age to death immediately would make it feel like there was some sort of cosmic balance she had to even out, or a deal with the devil that she had to pay the piper for, or something stupid like that.
I liked that part (the gray hair) and her relieved reaction to it. Now she can relax about the future, which will, now, be normal. She won't have to spend time worrying about out-living Ellis, etc. Finally, actually, just live. I thought the pseudo-science of the narration was jarring, but it needed to be explained. Though I like the idea of Flemming (older) doing it as exposition. Leaving out the fake "discovery in 2035" regarding the phenomena.
" I felt like she should have had at least two kids and one of them should have died."
Remember her husband died before the accident. Back then you didn't have children unless you were married. Once she realized what had happened, chances are she was extremely careful to never get pregnant again. She already knew she was destined to have to bury her only child.
Actors are mere products of a good writer's imagination
While Blake is lovely, she doesn't bring any life to the character. She lived a meaningless life. She abandons her daughter at some point because she thinks people would figure something out. I suppose the daughter didn't want to live a gypsy life and have a life - but she apparently didn't because I don't remember any mention of her being married or having children. At one point they imply that Adaline had Xerox stock, which I assume enabled her to pick up and move at a moments notice. Which begs the question, how would she sometimes have the time to pack up all her vintage clothes and furnishings? She didn't really LIVE a life - just seemed like she was going through the motions. She didn't travel, she held boring jobs for the most part and she kept getting the same dog over and over again - probably renamed it the same thing too. I just felt like Blake just doesn't have the depth of emotions and a better actress would've been able to breathe life into this character. Blake was just ok. And the whole premise of ending up with the son of a former lover is just gross. And did Ellis' wife get to know the "secret" - I mean, since Adaline was using her real name at the end instead of Jennifer. It was 1:49 but seemed like 3:49 to me. I enjoyed Harrison Ford though.
The father Fleming (the daughter) died, who raised the child while Adeline pulled up stakes running around the country/world?
They stated pretty clearly that her daughter was a junior in college when she went on the lamb. I think that's old enough to start looking after yourself, even if you don't think that it's optimal.
We are here to help the Vietnamese, because inside every *beep* there is an American trying to get out
reply share
The movie didn't show her whole life, just a critical moment in it. As to the rest, one has to think. Obviously she lived in Brazil or Portugual for one of her ten year mini-lifes, and that's why she learned the language.
After it ended I thought it may have been better if it had been made like Forrest Gump or Benjamin Button. Her not aging through time, and telling the story. Then it all catching up to her towards the end. It would have been more interesting, not that I didn't enjoy the movie as is.
I didn't care for the narration, it felt, as you said, like a textbook. Too certain and clear cut, I didn't like it.
I think something like "Highlander" had.. where he stayed with his wife until she was old and withered he stayed the same age, and she died. But that would be hard to pull of realistically in a 20th century society (you can't just build a castle in the marshes and hide away from everyone else).
You needed to see more loss, to show what she was so afraid of.