Better than original


This movie is undoubtedly is shot more seriously than the original OR any of its sequels!

reply

This movie is... okay. But it's certainly NOT better than the original. FREDDY'S REVENGE, which is probably my least favorite of the Englund films, is better than this one.


http://www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/

reply


I thought Freddys revenge was one of the better ones. Parts 4-6 were terrible and worse than the remake IMO.


Haters gonna hate

reply

You mean the male pornographic fantasy? I think not.

reply

No, I am referring to the way Freddy looked and acted in the 2nd film. Its the only time he had the amber colored demonic eyes and the "male witch" look he had in the film. He was dark, not cracking lame one liners every other second.


Haters gonna hate

reply

Freddy was excellent in the second film.

reply

It has some interesting ideas, but the execution is not handled well. I think the reason why this movie suffered is becuase of Samuel Bayer, he didn't care for the source material very much and hasn't really been at the top his game with his music video and commercial work in years. As far as I'm concerned Bay and co. should have gone to Chris Cunningham, his work is amazing from his shorts to music videos to commercials and he's still a visually fresh filmmaker. I also would've probably cast somebody else other than Mara as Nancy also, she just didn't really care for the material either it seemed.

I have an unbelievably long ignore list.

reply

If by "shot more seriously", you mean "shot with a poor script that felt unfinished with bland direction and a cast that all gave poor performances other than Jackie Earle Haley", then sure, it was "shot more seriously."

This film doesn't hold a candle to the original. It barely holds a candle to the piece of crud that was Freddy's Dead.

And FURTHERMORE, this is my signature! SERIOUSLY! Did you think I was still talking about my point?

reply

You could "try" to make a claim that a movie only made because of a lack of creativity, a guaranteed profit and because a certain other horror classic remake managed to actually be good and reap in profits and generate a prequel (and later a faux sequel to the original) was made more seriously than the Nightmare sequels, but to even think that the piece of crap remake of the original Wes Craven A Nightmare on Elm Street, was better and more seriously shot, is an obvious sign that your mother should of had an abortion.

reply

You could "try" to make a claim that a movie only made because of a lack of creativity, a guaranteed profit and because a certain other horror classic remake managed to actually be good and reap in profits and generate a prequel (and later a faux sequel to the original) was made more seriously than the Nightmare sequels, but to even think that the piece of crap remake of the original Wes Craven A Nightmare on Elm Street, was better and more seriously shot, is an obvious sign that your mother should of had an abortion.

TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE, FRIDAY THE 13TH sort of, and HALLOWEEN had all been remade by the time this was out. I seriously think this remake was the result of a win in rome situation. The remade it because "might-as-well".


http://www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/

reply

Ha! No way.

Snakes. Why'd it have to be snakes?

reply

The original is better imo.

reply

I agree. You can't beat Robert Englund.

Snakes. Why'd it have to be snakes?

reply

[deleted]

No way in hell the remake is better than the original, the remake was a waste of time and money. The Texas Chinsaw Massacre remake and the prequal to it, I actually thought were awesome films, the Friday the 13th remake was ok, but this one...I can't even describe how much it sucks...I think even Creepshow 3 might be just a very very tiny bit better, maybe...

"Plum near cut his head in two mmmmm hmmmm"

reply

There is a saying in my country: "There is a blind buyer for every lame horse out there." I think that perfectly defines people who love this movie over the original.

reply

You could never be in the business. No eye for decency..

reply

Hey bud, since when are horror movies supposed to be "decent"?
This isn't Captain America, get a clue.

reply