Episode reviews


I've got one up both for the pilot:


http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intel0.html


and for the series premiere:


http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intel1.html


Those of you who've read my DVCH reviews already know what to expect: lots of spoilers, the odd bit of blue language (some of it from the show itself) and brutal honesty.



http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intelligence.html

reply


...is up:


http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intel9.html



http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intelligence.html

reply

Another great review!

Question: Are you thinking that the DEA agent Ted is dealing with is the same DEA agent Mary & Co. are watching on the boat? I didn't get that connection, because I didn't recognize the guy on the boat (but maybe I'm missing something). Sure they're the same person?

reply

If you look closely, you'll notice that they are one and the same.

Also, it wouldn't make any sense to have it otherwise, since Falcone is pretty clearly the coke dealer that George (DEA Guy) wants Ted to keep off the radar.

If you think about it, the episodes where Mick was stalking Will's killer in DVI's season seven heavily implied that there is only one DEA rep up in Vancouver at any given time. This makes excellent sense--anyone who has worked for the U.S. Government overseas post-Cold War knows that such agencies are not nearly as well funded as other countries think they are. George has enough funding to serve Ted up some steaks and live on a nice boat. He doesn't have enough funding to have anybody else up there working for him. Winston was probably a major expenditure that will have to be justified and have to come out of the budget elsewhere.

This kind of cost-cutting would explain bounty hunters like Eddie and Old Spy Guy. Or, in real life, Dawg.

Something to keep in mind (that Haddock has so far failed to mention) is that Canadian intelligence certainly existed previously to CSIS's inception in 1984. It was handled by the RCMP, who also administer many of Canada's smaller burgs. I think we can all see the rather disturbing connotations for personal liberties that having your federal police force in charge of your national and international security implies.



http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intelligence.html

reply

Good points. I'll have to watch more closely next time!

reply

If I were the DEA, I'd have more than one agent in Vancouver. Not only the massive amounts of marijuana that seem to be dealt there [hey, several hundred pounds? that's a lot] but also the heroin situation would indicate the necessity of having more interdiction of what's heading south, and field agents would be part of a good early warning system. And although they may not be funded to the degree they would want, or people might expect, they're still a pretty massive agency, compared to Canadian equivalents.

reply

I'd be surprised if there's more than one agent, especially now. Canada is a friendly country that demands a low profile of that kind of American presence and despite all of the squawking about drugs and terrorists and Canada's allegedly porous borders (actually, the U.S. borders need lots more work before Pot can stop accusing Kettle) the war in Iraq has in fact eviscerated law enforcement and other emergency services in the U.S. Compared to the Middle East, Vancouver is a very low priority and a sensitive one. Haddock's portrayal of Canadians being relatively laid-back about foreign interference is misleading--they don't like it and many will tell you so, outright. Hence all the attempts to nanny Canadian security operations rather than run foreign security ops there directly. It's a form of outsourcing already overstretched U.S. operations.


Also, Vancouver not only doesn't hide its drug culture, it's pretty blatant about it. Quite aside from all the crackheads and addicts lighting up and shooting up in public (I've seen both in the past five months), there are the "hemp" shops down on Hastings St. that the local government makes no attempt to shut down or even curb. They even advertise. A lot of that product is going right down through the border and most of it (if the usual rule of thumb applies) is not getting stopped. If that is the kind of situation you get in a city on the other side of the border where you have multiple DEA agents working, I'd hate to see a city where they don't have a presence at all. Myself, I'm thinking that Haddock's ongoing portrait of an organization that talks a very intimidating game, but is actually small and quite furtive in its activities is a good reflection of what's happening on the ground. Reality is that drug enforcement agencies are always behind the eight ball compared to the drug dealers, especially outside of their home countries and especially where they have the death penalty for mules and no prosecution of major drug lords. It's why movements like terrorism might wax and wane but the drug trade never really goes away.


http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intelligence.html

reply

I can echo your point about Canuck justice agents [police at various levels, Crowns, Justice Ministries, CSIS, etc.] not liking American interference. Hey, they don't even like talking to each other [and not in the porous mole-riddled OCU kinda way Haddock describes]. It takes major initiatives to get the Toronto Police and other police forces to share information.

Hm, I'm going to look into this evisceration of law enforcement due to the Iraq war. You present a convincing case, but I must point out it seems at odds with the whole "homeland security" thing, as well as coupled with the ongoing war against drugs.

Oh, and thanks for the ep reviews. I managed, somehow, to magically miss the first ten minutes all three times this week, despite my best intentions. I wondered how Winston had gotten out of the back of the cruiser.

reply

"Hm, I'm going to look into this evisceration of law enforcement due to the Iraq war. You present a convincing case, but I must point out it seems at odds with the whole "homeland security" thing, as well as coupled with the ongoing war against drugs."

You shouldn't have any trouble. I've read articles that discuss the problem of Homeland Security and the war in Iraq sucking resources (financial, material and human) out of domestic EMS infrastructure to the point where, for at least the first few years, exhausted police, fire and rescue people were being run off their feet with overtime. The phenomenon is quite real and recognized. There is also a body of literature out there that assesses current security at U.S. borders as actually worse than prior to 9/11. Having been in and out of the country since then, I can attest to that. Britain's security during the Hoof and Mouth epidemic was better than Boston's Airport's is, still, if we have to name and shame.



http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intelligence.html

reply

...is up:


http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intel10.html



http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intelligence.html

reply

nice, snowleopard. i too liked roxanne jameson. if you've ever met a minister's staff, they can be like that.

reply

I haven't, but every woman higher up in a bureaucracy that I've ever met is like that. They're tough. Some of them sleep and/or backstab their way to the top, but a large portion of them watch each other's backs. One of the things I'm really getting to enjoy about the show is finally seeing such a woman's power network from the inside.

http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intelligence.html

reply

There's also a lot of ideological partisan maneuvering going on - which Haddock may be politely occluding, or the CBC may have asked to be toned down. Depending on either Mary or the Senator's political affiliation, there may be more of a relationship based upon that than gender. I mean, seeing a rising star of a police politician - and a black woman, at that - and helping her navigate tricky waters can be a real boon. The Senator ain't stupid; here's a potential Justice Minister one day [Public Safety, I'd say] and that kind of support can make or break a party leadership candidacy. I'll ask my boss about the old girl's network, and how pervasive it is. Keep in mind I work in Ontario, so there may be some difference in operation between us and BC - and definitely we have a different bureaucratic culture than Ottawa.

reply

Yeah, I didn't miss that. Mary's a smart, tough, black woman. She's a political godsend--not that she's got an easy job, by any means. There is, after all, a very good reason why there are so few smart, tough, black women (or women, for that matter) in the higher echelons of government in the English speaking government--quite a few reasons, in fact. It's kind of embarrassing, when you think about it, that supposedly "backward" Muslim countries like Pakistan and Turkey have had women in the top spot, but Canada has never seen a female prime minister or the U.S. a female president. And, worse, that the mere suggestion creates paroxysms of horror in many circles. To be listed among those Things that Make You Go 'Hmm' in North America.

Hey, ask away. Don't forget that Mary herself is from back East and that most of her connections have so far been in Ottawa. Her most important Western connections so far have been, respectively, a Vancouver narcotics squad sergeant (Don Fraser), a Vancouver pot baron (Jimmy Reardon) and the now-disgraced Western head of CSIS (Roger Deakins). Back East is where all of her government connections are. It's out West where we see all her friends in low places.



http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intelligence.html

reply

Hey Snowy...although she wasn't elected, Kim Campbell was our first female Prime Minister.

The Ministry I work for is 78% female, and the OPS-wide ratio is 58% female to male. A lot of the senior management is female. The Deputy Minister for the 2nd largest Ministry, MCSCS [Community Safety & Correctional Services] is a woman. Maybe that is due to the old girls' network, or maybe it is due to the tireless work of feminists pressuring for equity in hiring and non-discriminatory HR practice. All my bosses are women...all 6 of them.

reply

True enough. Mea culpa. I'd forgotten about her, though considering that she was probably a political sacrifice on the altar of Brian Mulroney's malfeasance, I don't know how much she was really able to advance the cause of top women in Canadian politics. But that's another discussion.

Also, having a large percentage of women in a profession is only half the battle. Otherwise, the nursing and library professions would get a whole lot more respect--and money. Which probably explains why Mary's female allies are only showing up now and remain behind the scenes. They're a group still in the process of building their power base.

Of course, Mary is also still in a male-dominated profession: law enforcement not politics. But it's very nice to see, finally, a woman on television with this kind of power who is not either isolated and battered (Jane Tennison on Prime Suspect) or a powerless and embittered outsider (take your pick of the latest cop crop of dysfunctional Nancy Drews with daddy issues). In that sense, I'd say that television is a good decade behind real life, possibly because television and film themselves remain very male dominated. Bit of an irony there.



http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intelligence.html

reply

Roxanne is played by the woman who played the female detective working with Leo in "Seven Tentacles" at the end of season six of DVI.

I thought that was her! Looks like she's lost a fair bit of weight since then, eh?

reply

Yo, it's getting crazy. Haddock has the pacing down - it just keeps picking up, and we're getting close to the holiday break.

reply

...is up:


http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intel11.html




http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intelligence.html

reply

Great review, as always. I'm wondering when George is going to clue in to the fact that if he nails Jimmy, per Ted's request, he's shooting himself in the foot with his gun-running operation. Eh, guess we'll find out eventually.

That scene with Ted in the bar was interesting because of its ambiguity. We don't know if Ted and/or the other guy are gay, or if Ted's just paranoid because he's worried somebody's spying on him. Brilliant writing, and acting.

It's sad to see Mary with the rug pulled out from under her . . . again. But I guess I knew the support she thought she had from Ottawa wouldn't last long. Still, she's got Katarina, who is one smooth operator and may take care of Royden singlehandedly (but not the way he'd hoped). The gal who plays Katarina reminds my husband of a young Marg Helgenberger . . . and, now that I think of it, there are similarities.

Speaking of rugs pulled out, it was great to see one pulled out from under Francine. Loved Fred Ewanuick (who I remember from a couple of "Da Vinci" episodes) doing yet another different turn from Hank, his "Corner Gas" character.

Is next week the last episode of the season? Yikes, if so, that's too soon!

reply

Great review, as always.



Thanks! I aim to please.


I'm wondering when George is going to clue in to the fact that if he nails Jimmy, per Ted's request, he's shooting himself in the foot with his gun-running operation. Eh, guess we'll find out eventually.


I suspect it will not be before the season finale--unless, of course, Haddock sicks a cliffhanger on us. Then, it wouldn't be until next season. With all the leakage, I'm astonished that George doesn't know about Jimmy's involvement already. Thanks to Jimmy, everybody else in that set-up (or at least Randy, which might as well be everybody else) already knows about George.

I keep calling George, "George of the Jungle" in my head. He doesn't come across as too bright a bulb, more of a legend in his own mind. I wonder if Haddock based him on someone specific?

Personally, I wish they'd wrap up the whole TedandGeorgeandWinstonandJimmyandTheDope thing and move on to the gunrunning. I'm much more curious about the gunrunning, which is a far more original storyline. It also would be an excuse to show more interactions between Mary and her supersnitch. They have great chemistry and that was the main plot point of the pilot. But it's somehow got lost in the shuffle since then.


That scene with Ted in the bar was interesting because of its ambiguity. We don't know if Ted and/or the other guy are gay, or if Ted's just paranoid because he's worried somebody's spying on him. Brilliant writing, and acting.


As far as Ted is concerned, I definitely agree that it's ambiguous what he was thinking there. But the other guy was clearly cruising for a little older Sugar Daddy action and one has to wonder why. Or why Ted followed him into the bathroom in the first place. Seemed awfully conspicuous to do so unless there was something on inside Ted's head besides simple paranoia about someone watching him, especially if Ted was waiting for his source to show up. It actually would explain a lot about Ted's personality if he were as deep in the closet as J. Edgar Hoover. And it's about time we got some kind (any kind) of background on him aside from the fact that he likes his Glenfiddich neat and in a coffee cup on his desk at 9am (and what is it about Haddock Entertainment and their obsession with Glenfiddich? They should show their characters drinking some decent booze for a change).

It's sad to see Mary with the rug pulled out from under her . . . again. But I guess I knew the support she thought she had from Ottawa wouldn't last long. Still, she's got Katarina, who is one smooth operator and may take care of Royden singlehandedly (but not the way he'd hoped). The gal who plays Katarina reminds my husband of a young Marg Helgenberger . . . and, now that I think of it, there are similarities.


I thought that might happen. Mary has been set up as too cool and flexible a customer, with a dangerously strong network that intimidates her enemies, for it to be a satisfying story if she were not thrown back on her own resources at some point. Truth is, she doesn't really need the senator.

I do hope she gets the position, though. It would be a waste of Katharina otherwise (both the actress and the character are fantastic), let alone Jimmy, to leave Mary stuck in the same situation at the OCU--or fired. One would put us in the same old situation next season as this season and the other would be a step back in terms of story. It's too early in the day to bring Mary crashing down.

Speaking of rugs pulled out, it was great to see one pulled out from under Francine. Loved Fred Ewanuick (who I remember from a couple of "Da Vinci" episodes) doing yet another different turn from Hank, his "Corner Gas" character.


Yeah, that was nicely done. And kudos to whoever made up the preview for this ep. That was a very nice bit of sleight-of-hand, making it look as though Francine was about to blab on Jimmy. I'm not too sure about the preview for next week, though. Seemed a lot heavier on style than substance. On the other hand, the show (as well as the previews) has suffered a bit from too much frenetic cutting back and forth. Focusing so relentlessly on one storyline is a nice break from all the jumpcutting.


Is next week the last episode of the season? Yikes, if so, that's too soon!


Nono. Second to last. The show gets preempted on the 23rd by hockey and then we get the season finale on January 30.




http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intelligence.html

reply

Argh! Missed it this week. Waiting for Friday midnight. I wonder if Little Mosque on the Prairie garnered Intelligence more viewers?

reply

I hope so. Actually, Little Mosque on the Prairie was pretty funny. I was pleasantly surprised. I heard they got over two million viewers.


http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intelligence.html

reply

Apparently 400k viewers for Intelligence this week. So maybe some bleed?

reply

snowy, thanks for the review. i missed the repeat on friday, so now i'm watching and using it to catch up. holy! holy! holy! it's so intense.

reply

LOL! I know! I keep thinking, "Jimmy, the word is c-o-d-e-p-e-n-d-e-n-c-e!"


http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intelligence.html

reply

Nono. Second to last. The show gets preempted on the 23rd by hockey and then we get the season finale on January 30.

Phew, that's good! Can't believe I forgot to tune in to "Little Mosque on the Prairie" (though it sounds like it did quite well enough without me). Just caught the last few minutes of it before "Intelligence" came on, and it looked pretty funny. Hopefully that will provide a strong lead-in to "Intelligence," and the ratings will continue to hold in both time slots so that we don't have to worry about "Intelligence" being renewed.

reply

...is up:


http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intel12.html




http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intelligence.html

reply

How cool is it to see another former "Da Vinci's Inquest" and "Corner Gas" actor in an episode of "Intelligence" (Gabrielle Miller)! This short stint can't be her only screen time here . . . I hope.

Loved Stella's crack to her mom as they were going out the door: "Why don't they just get a lawyer?" This kid probably has a pretty good idea that her dad isn't in the lumber business, and that his business problems aren't solved in the usual way.

It seems like Jimmy is getting pushed from all sides to take a little trip to the States and disappear for a while. The thing is, he could disappear in a way that Mary had not intended. Don't want that to happen! And especially not with Francine and Stella in tow. Though this could be one of those situations when Francine comes through unexpectedly. Not that she's a generous soul, but when it comes to Jimmy, she wants him as all hers, so she might do anything to protect him. Not sure how she'd face off against George, but given that her interests trump his, she might actually win.

Argh, can't wait till the 30th!

reply

In a face-off between George and Francine, my money would be on Francine all the way. George wouldn't know what hit him. Of course, it's all moot once George figures out who's running his precious guns. What makes me curious is who (and what) puts Jimmy behind that wall with a loaded gun in next week's preview.

And it looks like Katarina will be the one to bring Royden to his knees. So to speak.


http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intelligence.html

reply

I'm with you; my money's on Francine! :-)

LOL, had to laugh at your quip about Katarina!

I'd forgotten about the gun-running operation, since they didn't focus on that this week. I guess I'm sort of impatient for this info to come out, because I definitely don't want Jimmy falling for that trap and going to the States. But it seems like that's the direction they're heading. It's going to be a long wait till the Jan. 30th season finale!

reply

I also loved the scene where Ronnie throws the glass of water at Jimmy's face. Yes, these guys have known each other a lonnnnng time. Can't imagine anyone else doing that and getting away with it.

reply

That was a very telling scene, right up there with their respective interactions to seeing Johnny in the car at the end of last week's ep. Check out the interview of Cassini and Tracey on the official site where they talk about the friendship. Very instructive.

I don't know if this is deliberate, but I'm noticing some historical parallels in Jimmy and Ronnie. Jimmy, for example, has a style very similar to Julius Caesar's and Ronnie, in contrast, comes across a lot like Mark Antony, who always advocated kicking in heads over negotiating. The role of Cleopatra, meanwhile, seems to be divided up between Mary (hence, her nickname "The Queen") and Sweet. The Cleopatra dynamic also would parallel the fear that the Romans (here, the Vancouver criminal underworld) had of a powerful foreign queen who appeared to be seducing away the best men in Rome.

Whether or not the parallels are deliberate, it's interesting to contrast Jimmy's style of trying to negotiate and ally with anyone who will reciprocate with a little history: Caesar is now feared as a cold-blooded conqueror who brought down the Republic (actually, it was his nephew who was the cold-blooded bean counter who did that). But his patrician contemporaries tended to see him as weak and treacherous. They intensely disliked that, when blocked in bulding up power via the traditional routes, he allied with the women in his family (his beloved daughter was his equal and his staunchest supporter), the poor of Rome and even foreigners. The Jews of Rome, for example, showed up in force at his funeral to mourn him.

Further, Caesar is the first ancient ruler whom we see not only pardoning enemies, but actively using pardoning as a strategy to turn his enemies and lessen the damage of civil war.This had mixed results. Several of his assassins had been men whom he had pardoned on the battle field.

Why do we remember Caesar as such a dangerous man? Well, Caesar's unusual allies could be quite dangerous to his enemies. When Caesar finally defeated his great rival Pompey, Pompey fled to Egypt. But allies of Caesar there killed Pompey and presented his head to Caesar. Shocked and saddened, Caesar later said that he had intended to pardon Pompey, but was never given the chance.

Caesar himself was deadly once his vaunted patience ran out. Two examples suffice. Very early in his career, he was captured and held for ransom by pirates in the Mediterranean. They laughed at him when he swore that he would hunt them down and crucify them. They should have listened to him. As soon as the ransom was paid and he was released, he hurried to the nearest Roman city, got a ship, hunted them down and strung them up.

Later, during the Gallic Wars, Caesar conquered a particular town and made a treaty with it. There is some dispute as to how voluntary the treaty was on both sides, but to Caesar, a treaty was a treaty. The town, unsurprisingly, turned right back to Vercingetorix (the main Gallic leader). When Caesar came back, he cut off the right hand of every adult male in the town. So they could no longer wield swords, you see.

Aside from Jimmy cleaning out his brother's house in the pilot, we haven't seen very much of Jimmy's ruthless side. But I bet it will be making more and more of an appearance from here on out.


http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/other.html

reply

Very interesting analogy, re: Caesar. If true, then I wonder if there are any telling clues as to how Chris Haddock will wrap up this season. (I know, I'm way too impatient.) I'll go to the official website and check out that interview.

Re: Cleopatra, one could almost imagine Katarina filling that role, except for the fact that she's so completely loyal to Mary, who's the one calling the shots.

reply

I hear ya. Making us wait two weeks just because of hockey. The nerve.

I honestly don't know if they deliberately used Caesar as a sort of template for Jimmy (especially since I haven't had a chance to see HBO's Rome, which would be the most obviously immediate source for such a characterization). Jimmy does seem to be following a similar pattern in his behavior (especially considering that Caesar was famous for reacting very quickly to situations and turning a bad situation--like being besieged at the same time that he was besieging a town--to his own advantage). They do seem to share similar personality traits (aside from Caesar's notoriously omnivorous sexual appetites and shameless use of his aristocratic personal good looks versus Jimmy's more low-key family-oriented and working-class attitude). On the other hand, Haddock wrote the part specifically for Ian Tracey, so it would hopefully be tailored to his strengths from past roles. If you look at Tracey when he was playing Mick Leary, for example, he was at his best in that grey area between Mick keeping a cool head when others were losing theirs and totally losing it. When Mick was solid, he was as solid as you could wish for. But once he was done, he was done. Like Cagney, Tracey is at his very best working up to a white heat.

Once Jimmy finally decides he's done, I suspect we will see a very long trail of bodies before he calms down. So, I guess what will need to provoke him to that will have to be very personal.

One of the reasons why Dante and his men seem kind of pathetic is that they are so busy bullying and intimidating people who are weaker than they are, they show no awareness of the possibility that their enemies may not be weak at all and may well be leading them into a trap. Sure, they're dangerous--like stampeding bison. Stay out of the way and stampede 'em off a cliff and it's bison burgers all round for the next few months.

Yes, I hadn't thought of Katarina, but she is definitely a femme fatale. It makes sense to split the Cleopatra character up into several female characters (though Kristina turned out to be a bit of a dud), since the historians writing up the original story bled as many strong women out of proceedings as they possibly could.

Francine strikes me as more the frustrated Roman matron type. A lot of Roman patrician women at the time were major sluts.


http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intelligence.html

reply

It makes sense to split the Cleopatra character up into several female characters (though Kristina turned out to be a bit of a dud), since the historians writing up the original story bled as many strong women out of proceedings as they possibly could.

Exactly. Cleopatra was, I guess, supposed to be a woman for all women. Far better to acknowledge the fact that, uh, hello, women are just as complex, and capable, as men. We may do things differently; but then again, some individuals, regardless of sex, may approach the world in a nearly identical fashion. It's high time we got someone like Mary who is quite resourceful on her own, thank you very much. Yes, like most people, she does need help from other people, women and men. But she's also capable of being in charge, thinking her way through a situation and resolving it without having to be saved ("My hero!") every other second. It's been a long time coming, but I'm so glad Mary is finally here.

reply

...is up:


http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intel13.html




http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intelligence.html

reply

Great review, as always!

Re: Katarina's comment to Mary about "Don't worry about me. I always land on my feet," didn't she also add something like, "or my back"? LOL, for having so few lines per episode, she gets some of the zingers!

reply

I thought she might have added something like that, but I wasn't sure. My television is large and kinda old, so the sound isn't very good.

I really enjoyed Mary's whole dance with her collection of snitches, underlings and allies. That was really well done. Now, if only they could gel things better chez Reardon and slap down George (Ted's already looking pretty whipped), it would work well all across the board.

Not starting the season with Mary moving into the CSIS job would be a mistake, imho. I think the "will Mary be able to get that job" storyline has been tapped out. Time to move her up and into that new situation. Open up some fresh horizons.

I'm kinda wondering if they might be setting up a domestic terrorism storyline for next year with the gun-running/bikers-cum-skinheads thing a la 24, but scarier. Randy is working for the bikers, after all. That could be lots of fun and take us away from too much internal fretting in Reardon's gang. That got dull after a while.


http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intelligence.html

reply

I rely heavily on closed-captioning. I have hearing impairment, my husband doesn't, and even he finds that he prefers having the closed-captioning . . . though sometimes the words we hear having nothing to do with the words scrolling on the bottom of our screen.

Anyway, yes, when we watched it on tape again, Katarina did sort of chuckle and add, ". . . or on my back."

Interesting prospect of a domestic terrorism angle. I really hadn't considered that possibility. Though I feel like because "24" is mining that for all it's worth (and then some), people would make comparisons and say that "Intelligence" is simply copying "24." Which would be too bad. I've tried watching "24" and just can't get into it. Though I've read that Shaun Majumder is supposed to put in a few appearances, so that might be enough to get me to tune in, just to see what he's up to. (Of course, if he's already appeared and I've missed it, such is life. I just don't pay much attention to "24." If it's on and I'm channel-flipping, I might watch. Otherwise, I don't.)

reply

I would love to have closed captioning again, but my current television is too ancient for such a function.


See, it's precisely because 24 is doing it so appallingly that I would love to see this done (not to mention that 24 is more like a comic book than real life). And 24 is avoiding domestic terrorism like the plague. Swarthy, Middle-Eastern fanatics, that's their obsession. Homegrown white supremacists (of whom North America has a terrifying number) are right off the board.

I tried to watch 24, too. I loved the premise, loved the format and I think that Kiefer Sutherland is an excellent actor who has been having the ride of his life. But the sexism and racism (not to mention the constant flood of raving plot cliches coming at warp speed) really got on my nerves. The writing just sucked to an absurd level. I soon started watching very sporadically. The last ep that I managed to watch more or less straight through was the season one finale. Such a shame. So much talent wasted by really pedestrian writing in the trenches.


http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intelligence.html

reply

Before we got our current model (good grief, I think that was 10 years ago), I went without closed-captioning, but ever since we got it, I wonder how I ever did without it. When we visit our family members, Rick automatically grabs the remote and sets the CC function. Probably drives 'em crazy, but we like it. :-)

Ah, I was having a brain freeze when I read your comment about domestic terrorism. As in, home-grown terrorists, not foreign terrorists coming here to live, then taking action. Sadly, you are right on the money when it comes to North American nutcases. Very disturbing, and something we need to be reminded of whilst we remain fixated on "the war on terror" (as in, terrorism by those we deem "the other").

Agree with everything you say about "24." It's too bad that a show like that gets all the acclaim, when a vastly superior show like "Intelligence" doesn't generate anywhere near the ratings. Oh, well. Off to see "Children of Men" now.

reply

Ah, I was having a brain freeze when I read your comment about domestic terrorism. As in, home-grown terrorists, not foreign terrorists coming here to live, then taking action. Sadly, you are right on the money when it comes to North American nutcases. Very disturbing, and something we need to be reminded of whilst we remain fixated on "the war on terror" (as in, terrorism by those we deem "the other").


Skinheads have been linked to apocalyptic fundamentalist white supremacists like Tom Metzger since the 1980s in the Seattle area. They act as shock troops and enforcers. They appear to have a similar relationship to white supremacists as the Taliban do to al-Qaeda. They would make very scary antagonists.



http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intelligence.html

reply

And, having just seen "Children of Men" in the theatre (very different in certain details from the book), I'm reminded of how scary a prospect that is.

reply

OMG, what a terrible cliffhanger! I saw yesterday evening the season one finale episode, and I hate it to have to wait to know how it goes on. The last scene with Ian Tracey was really great, him totally horrified en calling Stella and Francine. He played it very, very well. I hope that he only said that he always has loved Francine because he was in a panic, because he has more brains than to love that sneaky bitch.

Anyway, now its my turn to wait until the Hallmark channel airs season 2 here, they don't know yet when that will be. For you it almost starts again. I suppose I will read at least the first review of the second season to make sure Jimmy is alright (he will be, I know, I just want to know how).

reply

LOL! Told you it was evil. But watch out for spoilers there.

Alas, I think he really did mean every word he said to her. Jimmy needs to learn how to spell c-o-d-e-p-e-n-d-e-n-t and move on. But since that would involve him telling half of his crazy family to stuff it, it would take a catastrophe for that to happen--or Francine going away permanently.

Then again, it sounds like the writers are happily serving up catastrophe this coming season. So we'll see.


http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intelligence.html

reply

I'll try to watch out for spoilers, but may be I'll read some out of curiosity, hoping that by the time series 2 will air here, I have forgotten all of them. ;-)

I would like Jimmy to have some real love affair in series 2. It would be nice to see the more human site of him, instead of the pokerface he has showed during 99% of series 1 (with the exeption of the very last scene). But rather not with Francine, let her stay the codependent hysterical ex-wife, that's fun. And she'll go even crazier if Jimmy is really involved in a serious love affair, other than the one night stands that were suggested in series 1.

reply

Yeah, the one-night-stand thing was annoying. Not so much because he was doing it, but because they had him so uptight early on that it seemed unrealistic when he finally got laid. And worse, we never actually saw it so we had no idea what was going on. She could have been the same blonde as the one in the pilot, which would have meant an on-and-off girlfriend, instead. Mary getting it on with Don worked much better because we saw that relationship coming.

And yeah, I think that Francine as a character has a definite sell-by date. Sure, abusive relationships like that can go on forever, but that doesn't mean we'll want to see it blow-by-blow for much more than we've seen already. Camille Sullivan has been having a blast playing her and the character has had some great moments (such a shame Sullivan didn't get a Gemini nod). But Francine is so over the top that a little bit of her goes a *very* long way. Not to mention every time Jimmy even thinks about getting back together with her, his apparent IQ drops about fifty points. It's not a pretty sight, especially since Jimmy is not otherwise a guy who thinks with his johnson--despite what his sister says at one point.

One of the really cool things about Jimmy is that Tracey plays him as a guy who can admire a nice derriere without having his head turned by it (Ronnie's big flaw), and he interacts with women as *people*, not pretty sex objects. So having him get back together with a psycho like Francine is just cringe-inducing. The guy could do so much better.


http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/intelligence.html

reply

Jimmy can certainly do much better than Francine. I couldn't stand it that every time she French-kissed him (or tried to), he didn't slap her in the face, but more or less kissed back. Like you said, it seems that his IQ drops as soon as Francine comes in. But he is not consequent: in episode 11 (I think, the one where he has the one-night-stand if Stella stays at his place and Francine throws coffee on him) he firmly states that they will never be back together, while the series ends with him saying he has always loved her. I still like to believe he meant to say behind that: "... as the mother of my child." or something like that.

Anyway, I hope Haddock also likes to have a love relationship with Jimmy, we'll see.

reply

Ugh. Next fall. Well, now I have another day free for band practice.

reply

Very nice to read the review after I have watched the pilot. I will surely read a review after each episode I will be watching the next 13 weeks. You really put a lot of work in it! :-)

reply

Thanks, Monique. Glad you enjoyed it.

http://www.geocities.com/rpcv.geo/other.html

reply