Portrayal of Persia too positive?


I was disturbed by the clear bias even in the first lines of the film. Persia, which people should know is another name for Iran, was presented as a great and honorable civilization. Especially where they said wherever the Persians went, "order followed". Didn't they realize that the Persian Empire was created through invasion and occupation. THey said that Alamut souldn't havent been invaded but they were on their way to invading and conquering others as well.

With kids seeing this this is insidious liberal Hollywood propaganda in the Obama era that even Disney is into now. Do they realize that Iran is where they stone women to death for alledged adultery? Or where according to wikipedia marriages are often arranged between first cousins? That is the true Persia. That and the taking of the US embassy for over a year, the sponsorship of the Beirut barracks bombings, the supply of rockets to Hezbollah and the funding of terrorist Islamic militias in Lebanon.

Oh yeah and since they are into glorifying the Persian empire, they conveniently didn't reveal that the glory days of Iran, as well as Iraq (with Mesopotamia/Babylon) and Egypt all took place before the invention of Islam. After the invention of Islam by Muhammad in Saudi Arabia, which he forcibly spread throuhg teror, violence and invasion, Iran, Iraq, Egypt, and Pakistan all never reached their previous glory again.

Now imagine we have to go to war against Iran, and instead of an enemy country are kids are like why are we fighting Prince Dastan.....

reply

I don't think it spoke of Persia in glowing terms, but it was a formidable entity in ancient days.
Its extension massive.
I think the film reflected the power and to deny that is to deny history.

reply

I'm happy people like you don't make movies.

reply

Well, remember when 300 came out, Ahmadinejad (Iranian President, as most of you know, or should know) had a hissy fit over it. lol, so, perhaps they wanted to make Persia look positive so as not to give him another hissy fit. Which is stupid, if that was all for him, but I dunno. Probably not. BUT, I wouldn't doubt that the thought crossed their minds, when making this film.

_______
Yes, that's me...Little miss Lee...

reply

300 was based on a graphic novel, and prince on a video game. To think that they have portrayed accurate history is ridiculous. Every nation, every empire had flaws, but also the capacity to do good. But getting history info from fictions media is retarded. Read history books, watch documentaries.
Ruh-tard.

reply

[deleted]

Did you mean to write that or were you just being provoking? I can only hope the latter, because the former would indicate a massive ignorance with regards to history, religion and humanity. Centuries ago while Persia was building civilized nations we were coming out of the cave...! Islam is not barbaric it is the individuals who twist it for their own ends, in the same way Christians over the centuries have twisted the bible, that make it violent. Actually this is a fun film made from a video game, I don't think you are supposed to be taking it politically seriously. Or do you think the silent Aladdin films were Islamic propaganda? That's really funny.... you made me laugh. Douglas Fairbanks was an Islamic spy. Lol. Oh and so is Robin Williams for lending his voice to the genie in Disney's Aladdin. Not sure the invention of taxation was good though...

reply

Every country and empire has its glory days and its despicable ones, but this view on Persia has nothing to do with the modern country it has become.

Also, this movie's historical background is most likely based off of what storyline was told in its video game counterpart. You shouldn't take so much offense over a 'fairy tale' storyline. That's like getting offended by Disney's Aladdin.

___
For some reason, everybody decides to use that voice to bitch about movies.

reply

Aside from the fact that the movie is based on a fictional video game and in the theoretical timeline it took place the area would still be called Persia, and the fact that you destroyed your own credibility by referencing wikipedia; you've made a great post implying movies made for entertainment should never take any liberties in production and remain 100% historically accurate.

reply

I think in this era of being politically correct and not wanting to step on anyone's feet you could understand why Persia is portrayed that way, and ofcourse our hero is Persian, and as they say the victors tells the taleSource:Prince of Persia sands of Time Reviewhttp://moviereviews.noskram.com/2011/06/prince-of-persia-sands-of-time -review

reply