I think it's because of the new deal of Disney+ screening it internationally.
In 2005, when it had been off the air for 16 years, they rebranded it into "Classic Who" and "Nu Who", so the 2005 was called Season 1 despite the showing first airing in 1963. Because Doctor Who is primarily is a primarily meant as a kid's show/family show, it made sense. In 2005 there were kids that wouldn't remember the show that ended in the 1980s. After such a long absence, it made sense somewhat that they'd need to re-establish the characters for a newer audience that might not be familiar with what had gone before. For the most part, it worked too. When the Daleks, Cybermen, The Master etc all came back for the first time, a fan familiar with the older work could enjoy the episodes, whilst at the same time there was enough explanation as to who these characters were to catch the newer fans up to speed.
I guess the thinking is sort of the same here. There'll be a lot of new fans internationally due to the Disney+ deal, and a lot of younger kids who weren't alive in 2005 watching for the first time. The downside, of course, is that there hasn't been any kind of gap. Ncuti Gatwa isn't starting again in the same way that Christopher Eccleston did. Having David Tennant do the 60th Anniversary episodes, then next going; "Oh yeah. This is Season 1, by the way." when the next episodes air, will jar existing fans. Does this mean they have to reintroduce who all the characters are again?
I suspect, in reality, it won't mean anything. And people will keep referring to it as Series 14, rather than Series 1 anyway.
reply
share