WHY DID THEY MAKE UMA LOOK UGLY?
WAS there even a hairdresser or makeup artist?she looks so bad,compare to ben made up face.
shareWTF ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT???????? uma is SEXY!
share
MovieChat Forums > Paycheck (2003) Discussion > WHY DID THEY MAKE UMA LOOK UGLY?
So true! Especially when we first see her at the party--what's up with all those clips in the back of her hairdo? She had the worst hair and makeup throughout the entire film.
I think she looked good in The Producers and Pulp Fiction.
Foolish people spawn foolish thoughts, thus opening their mouths expelling foolish gibberish.
Uma Thurman, in this movie or any, is a spectacularly, exquisitely, beautiful woman.
Uma is very attractive period.
shareBunch of sick crappy retarded people!
You should have some respect for her.
She's a great, brilliant actress and she's stunning, beautiful, wonderful.
It's not that they made her look ugly (I think she looked OK), as I just seen the making of Paycheck. John Woo explains how in certain situations he thought she looked a bit pale or her hair was in a mess after an action scene, and he sent in the make-up artists. However, she didn't have any of it because she wanted to look natural and how someone would really look after a motor bike/car chase, running away from people etc. Woo then says how this is something that makes her different from other female actors because they would always want to look perfect.
Hope that helps answering your question.
if she wasnt tall with great tits (sorry to bring that up but it is a factor) then she would be nowhere.
shareI think she looks good in pulp fiction. She should put on some weight though.
shareEarth to midlanders, she doesn't even have "great tits"(are you a child).
I'm sure that she is a lovely person in person but I don't consider her physically atractive at all. Even my aged male feet look better than hers; by a lot(unless the foot shot in KB was a joke and they weren't her feet).
Not every actress in every movie should be a supermodel. I'm happy to see a normal looking woman in a movie once in a while. Everybody is always complaining.
In Transformers, Megan Fox is beautiful, but everybody is complaining about het acting.
At least Uma can act. They are actors, not models. They are suppose to be able to act, not to look good.
BTW, she's not that ugly. I've seen worse.
khou van je voor altijd, cutiepie <3
I, for one, have no problem with normal looking women in movies. I would prefer a normal looking woman who can act to a gorgeous one who can't. Uma is a normal looking woman, that's why I could never understand why some people seem to think she's the most gorgeous woman ever.
share[deleted]
^^^THIS!
Those crappy drugstore barrettes with split ends and dry hair sticking out?! They weren't even trying.
~~~~~~~
Think cynical thoughts.
Thurman is one of the ugliest most revolting things the human race has ever produced.
Uma has inconsistant looks. There are times she smoking hot and other times when she looks like crap. And this usually occurs during the same movie.
shareI love how nobody's ever on the fence with Uma. She's a real love or despise actress.
http://www.movingimagesource.us/articles/the-middle-word-in-life-20100 406
Uma is ugly. She's a good actress but she is not pretty. She's like Sarah Jessica Parker, Martha Plimpton, Tilda Swinton, Meryl Streep, etc.. they a real actress' looks don't count.
share[deleted]
[deleted]
I don't find her attractive full stop TBH. She is one of those that a lot of people find hot and a lot find her ugly. I'm the latter.
Fantastic 'Futurama' Forum!!
www.FuturamaFF.com