Jet Li vs UFC Fighters
What do you think? How would Jet Li do against someone like Tito Ortiz,Randy Corture,Chuck Liddell in a "REAL FIGHT"
shareWhat do you think? How would Jet Li do against someone like Tito Ortiz,Randy Corture,Chuck Liddell in a "REAL FIGHT"
shareSIZE DOES MATTER.
Jet is a great martial artist and a tough guy, I'm sure. Tito, Shamrock, etc. are all much bigger, mostly heavyweights. Against any lightweights, I'm sure Jet (at least in his younger days) could hold his own.
In a fight, Jet Li would LOSE.
The guy is amazing, but UFC fighters are big and bulky, not very easy to take down.
HOWEVER, give Jet Li and the UFC fighters a weapon, and they're screwed. A simple staff can kill a person with one blow. Somewhere around the lungs if you jab and can get them in between the ribs. That kills with one hit, and pretty painful too.
So Jet Li can own them with a mop or some other minor weapon.
I read somewhere that at the height of Bruce Lee's life (Enter the Dragon we'll say) he was pound-for-pound the strongest man on the planet. Couple that with the fact that he may have been the biggest blur on screen ever (or at least until Sonic the hedgehog), I think he could take most of the UFC guys, although a lot of my friends would disagree. Jet Li, on the other hand, I don't know. He is older, slower (but still freakin fast), and not as strong. I think he could do well, but not beat the best of the best. Tony Jaa would probably fare better simply because he seems a little stronger.
My favorite Asian martial arts actor is still Jackie Chan, but I admit he'd get killed.
"Ford, I feel like a sofa."
--Arthur Dent
Jet Li would get owned in UFC, lol. Hands down and also Jackie no matter how much I like him. Tony Jaa with his muay thai, who knows, it is a good striking art, but I don't think he'd fair well against a grappler and striker mixed, plus didn't he only do it so he can do the Ong Bak movie?
shareWhy don't you people understand that Jet Li isn't a fighter but an actor. His skills are for showing off purposes not for real life fights. I mean sure, he could beat any averae joe with ease, but this would already be alone to his physical fitness. The UFC fighters on the other hand train daily to fight real fights. They are really fast, like see this video of Fedor vs Crocop http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-234887588630418587&q=fedor+vs+crocop
Look at the kick by Crocop around 1:00, and incredible fast and great reflexes Fedor has. Also they aren't stupid fighters who just try hit eachother. Both had a strategy there.
Anyway, Bruce Lee is a more difficult story. He's somewhat overhyped, but I do believe that he was more than what his record or the lack of it shows. I mean his speed was really something. And I think he could have used that to his advantage, but because of his small size he too would have lost if grappled.
Did you know that even Muhammed Ali fought in MMA? He fought against Antonio Ito, the best MMA fighters of that time and it ended in draw. However, if Ali was to try to fight in todays MMA, he would get beaten up. Because the fighting styles have evolved. It was just a while ago that I saw a video of some good boxer fighting in MMA against some average - below average kickboxer. The boxer didn't get even one hit before giving up, the kickboxer just kept making really fast kicks on his legs, so the boxer had no chance because at long range kicks would beat him and in close range grappling would beat him.
in the newsstand booklet "Total Body Guide" published by Men's Health magazine, there's a section that has select celebrities' stories and their workout routines/diets/etc...
Jet Li is featured in this section.
in the interview with Mr. Li by a Men's Health writer, he has a few things to say about martial arts on the streets:
"You could probably beat me up..." he says to the interviewer.
He then talks about how he's not a hero, and that the things he does, alot of guys can do, and also says, "... I think alot of guys on the street can beat me up. It doesn't mean anything."
You people take movies WAAAY too seriously. I bet you all also believe that there are fifty foot snakes, and that the "Texas Chainsaw Massacre" really happened. WuShu is NOT a combat art and Jet Li does NOT train to fight, has never been in a fight in his whole life (in his own words), and doesn't even know HOW to really fight (also straight from the horse's mouth).
Kung Fu in general is very ineffective, even Bruce Lee said this. Thats why he created "Jeet Kune Do", because Kung Fu is practically worthless in a real fight. Jeet Kune Do WAS MMA. It was taking what worked from any style, and discarding what didn't. Bruce Lee trained in boxing and grappling because he KNEW (just as MMAers do) that was the way to go as far as actually being an effective fighter.
Bruce Lee AND Jet Li have both said that Kung Fu is ineffective in the REAL world, and they're two of the most respected and skilled practitioners of Kung Fu in modern times. End of debate. Anyone who says Jet Li could take ANY professional fighter is a clown.
I would disagree that Kung Fu is ineffective. It all comes from the way it's taught. Practicing forms all day will get you nowhere, and a lot of martial artists don't know what they're doing.
I fail to see the strength of boxing though. I mean, there's great conditioning and everything, but you completely eliminate your legs. And don't get me wrong, I feel that any sort of martial art can be good (boxing, kung fu, karate, whatever) but it all depends on the practitioner.
And as to the topic, I don't know Jet Li on a fighter level, so I can't make a valid opinion as to him fighting some UFC fighter. One thing I think people should realize here, though, is the fact that there are lots of rules that come with the UFC that protect those fighters. Yes they are tough guys and everything, but if I had to deal with a boxer or some kind of MMA guy like that, I would go for his legs (break his knees, not hard to do with the right angle),because they are usually not used much, and go for his throat. If you can't breathe you can't fight, and you can't condition your throat from collapsing or being crushed.
Bruce Lee also spoke of the ineffectiveness(probably not a word) of traditional kung fu because of it's lack of effeciency. On the same token though, he took bits and pieces from these martial arts to make a superior martial art (jeet kune do). By this he is honoring the usefulness of Kung Fu. But I believe, just as he believed, that martial arts should be a fluid form, and a study that should incorporate anything useful to you, whether it's something from boxing, something from Aikido, or something from *insert fighting style here*. My problem with UFC MMA fighters is that they only kickbox or box, use a muay thai clench and then go to the ground and use BJJ and say they are MMA. It's mostly just boxing and ground work, I'd like to see something more. Especially within their ground work. I'd love to see more use of legs on the ground, and some different submissions, less ground and pound. But I do enjoy UFC a lot, I must say. They are talented fighters as well, these are just a few qualms.
And finally, here is two quotes from Bruce Lee to leave you with. They're from his book Jeet Kune Do. On boxing versus real fighting "If you put on a glove, you are dealing in rules. You must know the rules to survive. But in the street you have more tools in your favor-the kick, the throw, the punch." Jeet Kune Do and Thai boxing "Sure, it's a little like Thai boxing, except that if you had a gung fu fight, there'd never be any 'round three.' Somebody would be lying on the floor."
kornfreekiam:
You're naiv if you can't read anything more past what he said. Do you REALLY think that a normal guy like you and me can beat jet li? Absolutely not. What Jet Li is doing is what a great champion does; be humble. That's also one thing that Jet Li is much about.
He always talk about how he can't beat anyone. He isn't the cocky person. BUT don't get it confused that what he is saying is the truth. Far from it, his cabinet is full of prizes and to win those prizes you must be REAL good. If it was so easy then alot of people would win his awards.
Same as for his interview in the dvd. Jet Li isn't the type to say; Yes I can beat him. Just goes to show how little you guys know about him.
As for Kung Fu beeing ineffective; HAHAHAHAHHAH this is the most ridicilous claims I've heard since they last told me that Bush is a good president. You're questioning a method of fighting that's been used over 2000 years against a fighting "style" that's been used for no more then 30-40 years AT TOPS? Are you people insane?
NO Jet Li wouldn't win against all of them UFC fighters. Right now Jet Li wouldn't win on most of them since he is aging you know. He is 43! But jet Li in his prime would kick ANY UFC fighter without a doubt.
Some of you are ignorant to actually believe that power=win! You either don't have much experience from fighting (as in streets cause in the streets you fight all kind of different guys) or you're just talkin out of your a$$. What does power do if you can't handle all situations that you can be put in?
I have no sig.
Ok, so he's modest. What about Bruce? Bruce was extremely cocky, and ALWAYS bragged about being able to beat and even kill men with his bare hands. He also said Kung Fu was ineffective, and impractical in a real fight (and most of his JKD striking was from boxing), and that any decent boxer or even street fighter would be able to beat most black belts. WHOOOOSH.....did ya hear that? That was your argument flying out the window (unless of course you're more knowledgable of Kung Fu than Bruce friggin' Lee...). Jet Li may not be cocky, but he's not a liar either.
Sure, Jet has tons of nice trophies...in taolu Wushu. Which has no fighting or contact whatsoever. At all. They don't even train for actual fights, and someone who practices this has no better chance in a fight than a professional dancer. All Taolu Wushu is, is ballet with air punches and kicks. Look it up. I'm not stating opinions, but facts. This is what Li is so awesome at, and it's NOT a fighting/combat art.
I don't know about you, but I would dismantle Jet Li in quick and dominant fashion. I train in Muay Thai kickboxing, boxing, submission combat wrestling and Brazillian Jiu Jitsu (hopefully you'll see ME in the UFC someday :p). At the gym where I train, they also teach Sanda Wushu (the actual combat version...not the dancing *beep* Jet does), and when it comes to sparring the Kung Fu guys tend to get smacked around by...well, pretty much everything else besides Tae Kwon Do (it's a mixed martial arts gym). I know what I'm talking about from EXPERIENCE.
LOL@you kiddies and your hard cases of hero worship. The guy himself can say he's more of an actor than a fighter, and two of the greatest Kung Fu legends of the last century can say it's an ineffective martial art, and you guys will STILL believe you are watching the ultimate badass when you go see "Fearless".
You kids are arguing based on what you've seen in MOVIES, which is pathetic. Keep in mind that in a MOVIE, even Toby Maguire can take on 15 guys at once. Sorry to burst your bubble, but in real life Jet Li can't jump in the air and kick nine guys before he lands. Welcome to reality.
Lastly, being old doesn't make an art effective, it's part of what makes it ineffective. Most of the moves these guys waste their time practicing were designed for situations nobody encounters these days. For example, those pretty jumping kicks were designed to knock a man off of a horse. Thats why they don't work in a real fight squared up with another guy. Because they weren't even meant to.
Take it from someone who actually has knowledge of martial arts, not from some idiot(s) who took Jet Li's "Fist of Legend" WAAAY too seriously.
^ most of what you said is true...but i feel sad for you if you think mediocre boxers can take apart black belts of any MA...
I've seen a 1 year Tae Kwon Do student take apart a 4 year boxer at my university...boxers arent immune and they have a huge weakness they are not taught to kick...i'm not saying they cant kick or wont kick in real life but all the TKD student had to do was put 4 nice kicks into the boxer's legs and he coulnt keep going...boxers legs arent used to getting pounded...
I can bet $100 that any good lets say Muay Thai teacher can take apart any boxer...and not Tony Jaa either...i mean a proper Muai Thaist..
Because Muay Thai is actually an effective art. I train it myself as well as boxing. It's actually my favorite martial art.
That boxer was a joke. I don't even believe that. I've seen TKD blackbelts get schooled by guys with NO training, and I've never seen them even give a decent fight to ANY MMAer. LOTS of guys in MMA know TKD or started out with karate or something, but they just don't use it. Why? It's ineffective. That's why they stick to boxing and Muay Thai. Why aren't there any successful TKD/Kung Fu/Karate guys in mixed martial arts? Like I said before, do you think they haven't TRIED?
Well, they have tried, and failed miserably every time.
Also, "any" boxer? I think not. It's going to vary, but I hope you're not suggesting that any ol' Muay Thai instructor can defeat pro boxers on a regular basis. The pros would kill them.
Actually boxing by itself is a pretty poor fighting style too. Boxers can't kick, and that's why kickboxing for example is far superior form of fighting.
And I'm kind of beginning to doubt your knowledge of the subject. What the hell do you mean TKD (Tae Kwon Do?) is a poor art? Go search for pride records, there have been plenty of them and even Karate practicioners. Sure, none of them has been exceptionally good, but the fact that they have been competiting there and have won matches, means that they could beat the *beep* out of most non-professional fighters, you included.
The one thing in Kung-Fu what makes me like it is the philosophy. You can tell that someone like Jet Li is intelligent. Then we have people like you here acting all high and mighty and putting others down; sure, you speak facts most of the time, but having a little respect for someone like Jet Li would be appropriate, no?
Oh, and also, even if Jet Li doesn't practise a real fighting art, he still has great physics and he is really fast. He's also in control of his body and has great reflexes. That is why he can beat up even an inexperienced MMA fighter (not anyone in Pride or comparable, but I'm sure that he could beat you). And by inexperienced I mean inexperienced in a real fight.
"Actually boxing by itself is a pretty poor fighting style too. Boxers can't kick, and that's why kickboxing for example is far superior form of fighting."
Kickboxing is superior, and as far as stand up fighting styles, little else is, which has been proven.
"And I'm kind of beginning to doubt your knowledge of the subject. What the hell do you mean TKD (Tae Kwon Do?) is a poor art? Go search for pride records, there have been plenty of them and even Karate practicioners. Sure, none of them has been exceptionally good"
You already handled this one. None have been very good, and the ones that DO make it know OTHER arts which is usually what they actually use. For example, David Loiseau got started in martial arts with TKD, but he's not stupid enough to try and use that *beep* in the cage. He mostly sticks to Muay Thai. Most of these other guys with TMA backrounds are a similar situation.
"The one thing in Kung-Fu what makes me like it is the philosophy."
I don't care what you like about it or don't. I like Kung Fu too. It's a cool art. I didn't say nothing about Kung Fu that Jet Li or Bruce Lee themselves hasn't said. It's ineffective in this day and age. The fact that I like it doesn't stop me from wiping the floor with Kung Fu guys during training.
"You can tell that someone like Jet Li is intelligent. Then we have people like you here acting all high and mighty and putting others down; sure, you speak facts most of the time, but having a little respect for someone like Jet Li would be appropriate, no?"
Again, you handled this by yourself. I'm not just putting people down, everything I've said is true. It's not disrespectful to Jet Li to speak the truth, he said it himself. Jet Li is one of my favorite actors and I'm a huge fan, otherwise I wouldn't even have come to this page. It's disrespectful to REAL fighters such as those mentioned in this thread when people see too many movies and degrade their skills because they don't waste time jumping in the air and spinning around before they kick eachother.
They see Jet Li doing fancy *beep* with wires attached to him and run around talking about how he'd DESTROY someone who has dedicated their entire life to ACTUAL fighting. THAT'S disrespectful. Being HONEST is not.
"Oh, and also, even if Jet Li doesn't practise a real fighting art, he still has great physics and he is really fast. He's also in control of his body and has great reflexes. That is why he can beat up even an inexperienced MMA fighter (not anyone in Pride or comparable, but I'm sure that he could beat you). And by inexperienced I mean inexperienced in a real fight. "
Again, it's easy to watch his MOVIES and say this, and I agree, but there are plenty of dancers with just as good reflexes. It doesn't mean they can beat up a trained fighter. Jet Li has never been in a fight, and has never thrown a real punch in his life, and weighs about as much as a teenage girl.
Even if he COULD outstrike me (I'm very doubtful), his "reflexes" wouldn't help him when I double legged his ass. Then I could have my way with him on the ground and he would be virtually defenseless. Even the best wrestlers in the world (look at Kevin Randleman) get tooled when they don't know the sub game, and Jet would get picked apart mercilessly with NO grappling experience whatsoever (if his child like frame could even handle the initial slam).
I'm a huge fan, but he wouldn't stand a chance.
Ok, that was much better and shed some light. I still think you could have worded up your beliefs better, though.
Check Pride or was it K1. They've had some gold metal TKD fighter(s), if memory serves.
No, no, you're misundersanding me. I'm not basing it on his movies. The FACTS are that he is really quick fellow and rather strong too. Now, if you've ever seen a real fight, you know that even people in bad shape and without any fighting background can do devastating damage with their punches. Then lets take someone like Jet Li, who is in a great shape and does know how to use his fists, not at all as good as any decent MMA fighter, but he still surely is better than your average Joe. That's why I'd say he'd win in any bar brawl or even against some MA fighter, who still hasn't had any real fighting experience.
NO Jet Li wouldn't win against all of them UFC fighters. Right now Jet Li wouldn't win on most of them since he is aging you know. He is 43! But jet Li in his prime would kick ANY UFC fighter without a doubt.You live in a dream world. share
You have a point. Pride has less restrictions than UFC though.
And the weaknesses of the different fighting styles are the reason why MMA exists.
"And the weaknesses of the different fighting styles are the reason why MMA exists."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes but that wasn't my point - I was trying to explain that there's more out there than what most people realise. There are some styles that are complete enough not to need the assistance of other martial arts.
[deleted]
Bushido: Yes, there probably are. But most of them like Sambo for example is actually a collection of different martial arts. And the ones which aren't, aren't as efficient as MMA. I doubt that you can find a single style that can give you the groundwork of Jiujitsu and the hand-foot combination of Kickboxing.
Juggernaut: Ok, you clearly do know more than us. At least I wasn't aware of these magical pressure points that make your organs explode if you hit them, but thanks for enlightening us.
Just kidding.
We live in the real world, not in a movie. Sure, a well aimed bare knuckle hit on a head can kill you, but that's as far as the "pressure points" go.
And no, you're wrong. Size doesn't mean everything, but it does mean something. That's why lightweights and light-heavyweights do not win heaveyweight championships, aside from like one exception. Royce Gracie, a small man, beat up many people far larger than him with skill alone, so yes, skill > size, but skill and size > skill.
Bruce Lee said himself that traditional Kung-Fu just isn't very good fighting style. The so-called grandmasters were lazy and didn't train their body, which was another reason why he didn't like it. And incase you didn't know, Bruce wasn't a Kung-Fu fighter himself.
I hope I didn't fall into a troll.
"Juggernaut: Ok, you clearly do know more than us. At least I wasn't aware of these magical pressure points that make your organs explode if you hit them, but thanks for enlightening us. "
LOLOLOL!!!!!
That Dim Mak *beep* is the biggest crock of *beep* ever. They even had a special on the news where they took Dim Mak douches to a Jiu Jitsu school to try their pressure point and "psychic" attacks. Guess what?, didn't work. Everyone who practices these types of martial arts are 100 lbs overweight, enjoy playing D&D, and run around talking about how they aren't allowed in the UFC cause their style "is too deadly".
Don't buy that *beep* signum. Go to a martial arts site like "Bullshido" to get some imformed opinions from people who actually train and fight. Forget the tards on imdb that think Jet Li or Jackie Chan could take Mike Tyson because he doesn't kick.
"I doubt that you can find a single style that can give you the groundwork of Jiujitsu and the hand-foot combination of Kickboxing."
No you probably won't find that exact combination in a complete, traditional martial art, but so what? Having trained in kick boxing for 3 years I know all too well its limitations, and combining it with jujitsu does not render it an unbeatable style. There is no "ultimate" combination. It's all about choosing the flavours that are just right for you. If you read my original post again, you'll see that my definition of a "complete" martial art is one that gives you the tools and confidence to come out on top in any given situation. I've found the style that does that for me - giving complete groundwork, brutally efficient stand up techniques and weapon defence and usage training. I was trying to encourage people to step away from the stigmas you see all too often on forums like this and really look at what's on offer out there.
Kornfreekiam: I don't understand. I thought I made it overly clear that it was just sarcasm.
Bushido: I guess I kind of missed your entire point then, my bad.
Good jaw helps remember one punch usually ends a bar fight, situation and the person your against has gotta account for alot regardless of styles and i've done MMA, bjj, greco roman wrestling and Thai Boxing but i can't start saying that means i can go into my local pub and beat every person that will ever go in there thats just plain stupid and ignorant not actually think of stuff that accrues in a real life situation.
shareI think some of you guys are too narrow-minded. What's the logic in discrediting a martial art solely because it hasn't 'proven' itself in the UFC? Now that is just ethnocentric thinking. Most of the real kung fu masters in China have never even heard of competitions like UFC or Pride. If anyone thinks kung fu is useless and ineffective as a fighting system, they should go to China and issue an open challenge and see what happens, instead of expecting masters to come "prove" themselves by joining competitions. That's just disrespectful.
shareYou do not understand. It's not like all the Kung-Fu masters are from China. Many of them emigrated to the USA for example, decades ago. They have continued to teach their art there, and it's not like you have to be Chinese in order to be good at Kung-Fu.
Anyway, the reason why we think Kung-Fu just isn't very good, is the fact that Bruce Lee said so, Kung-Fu fighters don't do well in MMA, every single style has it's weaknesses and the moves aren't very practical.
I respect Kung-Fu because it's probably the most demanding as a martial art, because the moves are often over-dramatized, but as a fighting style it just doesn't cut it.
How do you know that the Kung-Fu masters don't know of Pride or UFC anyway? You asked them?
I think you're confusing kung-fu with "contemporary wushu", which is something developed for show and performance, and that's what Jet Li did as an athlete in contemporary wushu. Kung Fu or Wushu is not just one style. "Wushu" in Chinese literally means "martial arts", and there are thousands of different fighting systems in Chinese Kung Fu, and these include common weapons, secret weapons, styles that teach you to fight an opponent while riding a horse etc. A lot of the "Kung Fu masters" that travelled to the USA in the early days are mostly from Hong Kong, which is just one tiny city in China. As much as I respect Bruce, I have to say that he didn't really know what he was talking about because his knowledge of kung fu was really limited to a few southern styles that were popular in Hong Kong at a time, such as Wing Chun, Choi Lee fut and Hung Gar. These styles were basically unheard of in mainland China before. In fact, Bruce was the key individual responsible for popularising Wing Chun in China and around the world. He had not met the real masters in mainland China, and knew little about internal martial arts. Yes he did learn taichi in Hong Kong from his dad, but it was Wu Style Taichi which is not known for its combat abilities at all. What I'm trying to say is that Chinese Kung Fu systems do not need to be 'validated' by MMA contests. If anyone doubt the effectiveness of Chinese Kung Fu, they should go to China and issue an open challenge, instead of sitting at home and expecting masters to come prove themselves to you. That's not the way it goes, and it makes no sense. It's just narrow-minded thinking that everything is only credible and valuable after acknowledgement from the Western world. If you've ever been to China, you'd know that contests like UFC and Pride are not widely-known at all. Just because the shows are popular in the US does not mean that the entire world becomes crazy about them by default. If you wish form any kind of objective and rational judgement, this type thinking is not helpful.
shareNo. We know very well what Jet Li is practising and what Kung-Fu as fighting art is.
Basically you're claiming that there are some secret Kung-Fu masters who haven't showed anything, yet they are the greatest thing since ever. What the hell. Until THEY prove themselves, we have no reason to believe any of this *beep* I mean, how many mainland secret Kung-Fu masters have you seen fighting? And I mean really fighting. I bet none. So, the question goes, why do you believe what you believe?
[deleted]
signum013 from your reply you're obviously deeply prejudiced and have a habit of making random assumptions. Your view of the world is clearly limited.
shareIf you want us to respect them as some kind of super fighters, then yes, they have to prove their skills to us. And since none of them has ever actually shown their skills in an actual fight to the public, so why the *beep* are you respecting their FIGHTING skills so much again?
This master of yours, what exactly did he do? Some kind of jump kicks? Or? You do realize that you can do all kinds of super complex kicks and punches, but it doesn't mean that they are actually useful in combat. Infact I can guarantee that they aren't. You're seriously stupid if you think only some unknown and secretive Chinese grandmasters are the greatest fighters. The MMA fighters have chosen martial arts as their lifestyle too.
Quite the opposite. I'm looking at things objectively and not based on the monopoly Kung-Fu has on the movie industry.
"There's no doubt that Jet Li is not the greatest fighter in the world, but saying that he's a fake is absurd. After he made the Shaolin Temple series, he opened up a martial arts school for a while, because his movie career wasn't going anywhere. Some of his students are now bodyguards for rich people in China, which means they must have learned some practical skills from Jet. Yes, I agree that Jet Li has no chance against top-class MMA fighters, but he can beat up any average martial arts person in a matter of seconds." - lworkk
It's clear to me now, that you don't know what you're talking about. Honestly, why do you argue if you haven't studied the subject thoroughly? Jet Li isn't a fighter, he has said it himself many times, he has never even fought for gods sake, so why the *beep* do you think that he could beat up a fighter with experience in a matter of seconds?
[deleted]
What the hell? Nobody has claimed they can beat Kung-Fu masters just because they're huge; they can beat them because they too train martial arts.
Trust me, any MMA-fighter can too. A good hit in a bad place in head can kill you right there.
I don't really think the UFC guys are great. I think Pride fighters like Fedor Emelianenko is great.
Ah, the chi. I can tell you already, it's bogus. It apparently works on psychological level, just like some religious acts do. It's called suggestion. I think you're *beep* me anyway, that's exactly the same story as of that one Kung-Fu master who couldn't reproduce the chi attack, when he tried it on other people than his students.
Why wouldn't I say MMA are better than Kung-Fu? MMA is basically every style in the world against just Kung-Fu. What the hell makes you think it's superior to everyone else? Apparently not facts, because all of them point towards Kung-Fu not being a good fighting style. And it's _your_ job to prove that it's not weak.
Bruce Lee wouldn't. You're a biased and idiotic fanboy or a troll.
You're not making any sense. When have i ever equated Jet Li to a real kung fu master? Yes he is a champion in contemporary wushu but it doesn't mean he represents kung fu. I acknowledge the fact that he'll get destroyed by MMA fighters, but he's not completely useless in fighting, because he actually learned some combative forms of kung fu outside of the national institutions after he won the title. Although his ability is limited, he was still able to teach some practical combat skills to students who have now become bodyguards for top business people in China.
You obviously have the wrong impression of kung fu because of your limited knowledge. You keep referring to Kung Fu as a singular style, whereas in reality Kung Fu refers to every single martial arts system from China, and there are thousands of them. As to the effectiveness Chinese kung fu, all I can say that it has endured thousands of years through countless battles and wars before the invention of firearms. A kung fu master once said that if anyone wanted to challenge him, don't challenge him while sitting home and expect him to come to you. If you doubt the effectiveness of kung fu, don't just sit at home and expect kung fu masters to seek you and prove themselves to you, because it's just ridiculous as anyone with any sense can see.
signum013 also to your comment about Jet Li saying that he's never had a fight in real life, do you actually believe that any average adult would have never even had one single fight in his entire life, let alone a martial artist? What Jet Li is trying to do by making such a statement is to convey a message of non-violence according to his personal philosophy based on Buddhism. Jet Li is a peace-loving person right now, but it's actually quite widely-known in China that when Jet Li was young, he was somewhat arrogant and sometimes looked down on other martial artists. Do you think with this kind of attitude he would have never entered into a fight as a young adult? It's only with age that he'd matured into the wise person that he is now. By saying that he had never fought in life, Jet is simply being socially responsible and setting a good example because he doesn't want his movies to cause violent behaviour in kids who watch them.
Even Donnie Yen, who is known for having being a problem kid as a teenager that always started fights and joined gangs, is now saying to his younger fans that he grew up as an obedient child. Now why wouldn't Donnie tell them everyone that he beat up all these people and started fights just because people looked at him in the wrong way? You tell me. Why would Donnie Yen, who has a police record from fighting against 8 gang members in a bar due to girl problems, now be saying that he was a good kid, and encouraging people to call the police in a situation of confrontation?
[deleted]
Once again, since you don't seem to understand simple logic. If you want anyone to respect the Kung-Fu masters, they have to prove themselves. There is no reason to consider them any good until they show their skills. Until that day they will be inferior. If you disagree, then you have to agree with this, there's this Finnish fighting style called ASsdghslhrtliehnroihn, it uses only fingertips and they consentrate their spirit power and thus can make entire buildings explode just by looking at them. If I'd go by your logic, then until proven otherwise EVERYONE IN THE WORLD would be a killing machine. That's not how it works, however. You want me to respect Kung-Fu as a fighting style? Then show me proof of their skill.
I know there are a lot of different Kung-Fu styles, but believe it or not, a lot of them are very similar, for they have the same roots.
So, you're calling Jet Li a liar? Does Jet Li look like the type of guy who would lie? I'd love to see you go and tell that to his face. I bet he would just look at you disappointed.
And yes, it's not like everyone gets into fights, especially if they try to avoid them. Jet Li is exactly the type of guy who does everything to avoid a fight. Thus it's not at all strange that he hasn't ever fought.
I'm not American, you *beep* idiot. Good argumenting there anyway, lets pull the "you're American" -card once your ignorant fictional stories have been refuted.
That small Kung-Fu master in his 50's will lose because he has no fighting experience against other styles than Kung-Fu, he is far weaker and cannot take as much hits. And the MMA fighter (assuming he's also someone great like lets say Fedor Emelianenko) has also been training since when he was a very small kid.
Of course it depends of the skill level of the fighter; of course some Kung-Fu master will beat a MMA fighter who has been practising for only a year or so. But put a good MMA fighter from pride against Kung-Fu master of any sort really, and I'll bet you the outcome will be different.
That energy thing is just *beep* no offence. There is no Chi, not at least in the way some people claim it exists. That's a physically proven fact.
Yeah, energy field that makes even a knife break when you hit him. Are you by any chance an extremist of some religion? This is not a fairy world, this is reality. There are no force fields you can just make up or shoot lasers from your eyes.
Even Bruce Lee laughed at this Chi *beep* and he if anyone should have known of it. That's why Bruce Lee trained his body in the western way, like boxers do, because there is no mystical Chi powers.
Negative, I'm just using Bruce Lee as an example. Wasn't it you who said he was the greatest ever? Yet the guy decided to practise the western arts. He even fought a Kung-Fu master, yet his organs didn't explode nor did he get beaten up.
Good god, I'm disgusted that people can be this *beep* stupid even in this age. Seriously. What's next, a person claiming that he can fly and shoot fireballs from his hands?
[deleted]
I know there are a lot of different Kung-Fu styles, but believe it or not, a lot of them are very similar, for they have the same roots.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This statement just shows how plain ignorant you are. The only "kung fu" you've ever seen in your life is probably acrobatic contemporary wushu. And to your statement about me calling Jet Li a liar, you've obviously missed the point that I was trying to make. You've just demonstrated how simplistic your view of the world is. You can continue living in your own enclosed little box. End of discussion.
Bative. It shows why I'm correct. Good job there _NOT_ refuting my point.
You did say he lied, for a good cause, but that's irrelevant you still claimed he lied.
No, your a horrible person. You try to take credit from where it's due and give to others based on *beep* fiction. People like you are the reason why there are so many wars in this world.
Chinese are smaller than Caucasians, Kung-Fu fighters don't train their bodies like a boxer for example does. Thus they are physically weaker. You can believe those Kung-Fu movies about a grandmaster who will beat twenty guys alone without breaking a sweat and can take hits without them affecting him, but that's not the truth. A man in his 50's is weaker than a man in his 30's.
MMA has basically everything over Kung-Fu. Best grappling, best kicks and best punches. Let's take a fighter who trains Jiu Jitsu, Boxing and Muay Thai. He is practising three different styles that all specialize in something. Of course he's going to be better than someone who trains a weak style that tries to train everything based on little knowledge. MMA has all the knowledge in the world, Kung-Fu only from China.
It's exactly worse to practise only one style, unless it's a style like Sambo which is basically a collection of all the things that are useful from different styles.
I know for a fact that you have never fought against anyone worth mentioning. You're too stupid for anything else.
I'm trying my best to stay optimistic about this world, but when I encounter stupidity like the one you two show, I just keep falling towards pessimism. Human is a stupid animal, it seems afterall.
[deleted]
Ok, I'll ask you a question. Have you ever seen any Kung-Fu master perform these chi attacks - that make your organs explode - on other people?
And it's not like you have any class or honor either. You're insult me just as much as I've insulted you, and you underrate the MMA-fighters so heavily that it's not even funny; same thing you think I'm doing. You're a hypocrite.
Jet Li is a peacefull man and would never foght any of the ufc fighter. BUT if he did, i think he would have a pretty good chanse to win.
"Jet Li got Zen in his eyes" - Inside Kung Fu Magazin (2005)
"I know there are a lot of different Kung-Fu styles, but believe it or not, a lot of them are very similar, for they have the same roots."
I agree with most of what you said, but you saying this is just the very epitome of ignorance. Do you know what "kungfu" or "gong fu" even means? It's just the umbrella for self-defense, a variety of completely different martial arts. If you think some guy in Northern China had communication and the same roots as someone from Southern China, you're talking out of your ass.
China started as a collection of various provinces that had very little communication between them. The word for "country" in China actually has roots in the word "wall," they were exclusive countries that were ethnically and culturally different. You lumpsumming Chinese is just as bad as someone else throwing all "Americans" in one balloon category.
Saying that kung fu is similar is like saying all martial arts are similar because they have similar roots. Judo, Aikido, Jiu-jitsu, and Nin-jitsu actually do have similar roots, but you seem to attribute them to different arts. Looks like you're the one that needs to learn up on martial arts and their histories.
San Shou and Muay Thai certainly aren't useless, and they have their own competitions. Many of them don't fight in UFC or Pride, but that doesn't indicate that they are any worse of fighters. It's ethnocentricism to believe that the devil you know is better than the devil you don't. There are great fighters of any background and ethnicity. You are stupid if you think there is no one from China that doesn't train in mixed martial arts or combine arts to cover up the weaknesses of each individual art; what do you think San Shou is?
As much as I love Jet, he would get absolutely manhandled in an MMA fight. It obviously depends on who he's fighting, but any of the top tier fighters would make quick work of him. Kungfu is not suited for the MMA world, period.
sharelmao, anyone that said that Jet Li stands any chance in the cage especially with the likes of Randy Couture, Tito Ortiz and Chuck Liddell are smoking drugs. See when teh UFC first started they had all these black belts kung fu fighters and karate masters and whatnot. Guess what they didn't last. Guys with no formal training except for the street made quick work of them and that was the end of their hype. Who cares if Jet Li is master of Kung Fu or whatever I would give him more than 2 minutes in teh cage with Couture or Liddell or Ortiz...
Royce Gracie left UFC, not because PRIDE is more technical (MMA is MMA, its all teh same in every promotion), but because he didn't like the direction that UFC was going. Also PRIDE was like WWE when it started, it was a staged and fixed MMA promotion.
Who really cares what it was. What matters is that it currently holds the best fighters on earth, well, at least the best who are fighting in organizations like this.
I've been training in Martial Arts for a number of years, And I love to watch Kung Fu and the way jet lI has master the that art, I have a great deal of respect for that. But Im also a big fan of mixed martial arts, and every single time that I have seen a Kung fu fighter go up against any type of fighter such as a Karate fighter or a mixed martial artist, Kung Fu always gets embarrassed, because kung fu is too, stylized and flashy for its own good, plus their hits are some of the fastest but usually the weakest. If you want to see proof right now, go to You Tube and type up "Kung fu vs. Karate" and you will see a number of examples. I love Jet Li, but even in his prime he couldn't survive in the UFC.
shareI would put my money on Jet Lee, he is MUCH faster, but the UFC guys is stronger.
But i do think Lee would win in a 1on1 fight.
Wushu is like Figure Skating for the Orient
Tony jaa is a real thai boxer, but he learns muai korat which is for soldiers really its to take down the enemy in the quickest steps possible(kill). Which probly isnt allowed in UFC.
Bruce lee on the other hand is a street fighter the guy was in many street fights when he was young and his style of martial arts is to be as fast and deadly as possible but in todays *beep* society its cheap. couse one kick to the balls or jab to the throat and its game over, for bruce his side kicks are damn fast so one kick to the balls would really hurt espically since he broke 5 5 cm boards with that kick.
JKD is pretty much all the good bits of every martial art and united into one and all the *beep* discarded .
Also bruce when he was filming every single fighter who stared with him wanted to challenge him first before they were filmed losing or dying to bruce lee, he won all the challenges even against chuck norris.
Sad he died, i really wanted him to live on and see his movie game of death original rather then some *beep* directors messing it up.
THing is people dont know the difference between movies and real fighting
the same with jackie chan and even bruce lee.. people act like he would beat anyone but i seriously doubt it.
Well he would loose in a real fight and he would win if it was wushu.
"Civilization is a *beep* failure" - Serj Tankian, System of a down
Well, I remember Jet Li himself said in an interview that in a real fight "they would beat him up badly".
But who cares really? It's an martial art action movie so just enjoy the movie.
Eventhough there is no allowance for weapons in legal fights (like UFC etc), it's possible that Jet Li could lose the fight. But in real life everything is possible and Jet Li is more diverse fighter than most of the fighters in UFC as he's a master in different kind of weapons, which the others fighters obviously aren't. Further possiblity are the pressure points on body, no matter how skilled you are, there is always a weak spot everywhere, unless you're Shaoling Monk capable of resisting every single spot on body.
So basically, I say Jet Li can lose to the bigger sized and stronger guys of UFC, but since you can't do everything in a legal fight, Jet Li can't act to fullest and thus he'll be at disadvantage. Not that he'll win anyway if he was, but then it might be fair.
About Kung Fu, you can't say it useless, but it's not always that practical, since it might only prove to be effective when you really need to defend yourself, so it's obviously without any rules. But either way, it might look all that fancy and of course it is to a certain degree as you watch kung fu movies. But the less and most easiest move can also be the most usefull. Every martial art got a weakness, but kung fu itself is really more than one martial arts.
All you fools should just shut the hell up! I can't believe you nerds spent so much time arguing over the same crap that this thread now spans 15 pages. Get a life you dorks! And for all you posers saying how great this style is and how you are a great MMA fighter stop dreaming! I'm sure arguing over the internet for 3 hours a day is part of your daily training right? I bet the closest thing to a fight any of you morons have gotten is getting slapped silly by your mama for being so dumb.
This is a board to discuss "Cradle 2 The Grave." If you have nothing to say about this movie go visit Ask.com and spam your BS over on their message board. I'm sure you will get great advice from people just as pathetic as you on how to fulfill your dream of becoming a MMA superhero and armbarring all the baddies on the planet.